Are Women Bloggers Taken Seriously?

Julie of wine me, dine me blog, was miffed when she read a local article that virtually ignored female bloggers. When her male friend asked her "does that really matter?" she replied:

Yes, it does. Women's voices are often ignored (as this article details), and we really aren't taken as seriously. Though there are tons of successful female food bloggers (Accidental Hedonist, I'm looking at you), it's still a bit of a boys' club. (Source)

Though I can honestly say that the issue of gender has never reared its ugly head when I pick posts for Neatorama, apparently a lot of women bloggers feel they aren't taken seriously. To wit, this post by Megan Carpentier of Glamocracy, a blog of Glamour magazine:

For political bloggers who happen to be women, such as myself, my colleagues here at Glamocracy and elsewhere, the blogosphere can seem like a very testosterone-filled place. Sure, you've got Arianna Huffington and Patricia Murphy of Citizen Jane Politics. But the list of other must-read blogs is dominated by dudes: Andrew Sullivan, Markos Moulitsas (of the Daily Kos), Mike Krempasky (of Redstate.com) and of course Matt Drudge. (Also, why do so many of their names start with "M"? I've got that part down!) A museum exhibit dedicated to blogging here in D.C. (I know) has a small display referring to former Wonkette Ana Marie Cox, but the room is dominated by several TV screens featuring male blogger-pundits like Matthew Yglesias and Ezra Klein. So, why do the boys of the political blogosphere command so much attention? (Source)

Even the New York Times, in its first coverage of the BlogHer convention, put it as such:

A study conducted by BlogHer and Compass Partners last year found that 36 million women participate in the blogosphere each week, and 15 million of them have their own blogs. (BlogHer, which was founded by Lisa Stone, Elisa Camahort Page and Jory Des Jardins, has itself grown into a mini empire that includes a Web site that helps publicize women’s blogs, and an advertising network to help women generate revenue for the site.)

Yet, when Techcult, a technology Web site, recently listed its top 100 Web celebrities, only 11 of them were women. Last year, Forbes.com ran
a similar list, naming four women on its list of 25.

“It’s disheartening and frustrating,” said Allison Blass, a BlogHer attendee whose personal blog at www.lemonade-life.com is about living with Type 1 diabetes.

At the seminar “How to Take Names and Be Taken Seriously as a Political Blogger,” many women said that their male colleagues and major media groups tended to ignore them, and to link to them less often (unless they are Arianna Huffington). They pointed to the Netroots Nation gathering (formerly known as Yearly Kos) for politically progressive bloggers, occurring that same weekend in Austin, Tex. (Source | Photo by Jessica Brandi Lifland/NY Times)

(Note: the article was written by a woman, Kara Jesella - which garnered an interesting retort by Rebecca Traister of the Broadsheet blog over at Salon.com)

As a counterpoint, Drew Vogel of Relentless Self-Promotion blog wrote:

My short answer to the question of if female bloggers are taken seriously is the same answer to the question of if male bloggers are taken seriously: No. Bloggers are not taken seriously solely as a function of gender. If the content is good and should be taken seriously, then they are — and should be — taken seriously as bloggers. Regardless of gender. [...]

The broader question — are bloggers taken seriously? — is a salient one even removing the gender issue. As a blogger of more than 12 years (and sysop of The Cafe’ BBS for years before that), I believe that bloggers are not taken as seriously as “traditional” journalists. And, in my opinion as a long-time blogger, that’s okay. I take my blogging seriously, but do not think that I am doing anything more than sharing my opinion with those who care to read it. (Source)

What do you think? Do women get shortchanged when it comes to blogging? Does gender matter in the blogosphere?


Is there any reason to believe that men and women are blogging in equal numbers? If so, then maybe you can blame sexism. But if there are a lot more men than women who blog, it makes sense that more of the popular blogs would be done by males.

In this case, it makes more sense to blame the cultural factors that make women less likely to contribute than to blame male bloggers for ignoring female bloggers. If you start doing that, you risk making a blogger's gender more important than the quality of his or her content. In a number of the blogs I read, I have no idea if the writer is male or female, but I keep reading because the content is good. Unless the content of the blog is really specific to women, I don't think it should matter who is typing it.

As for media coverage, you can't cherrypick one or two examples of reporters ignoring female bloggers and say there's some kind of systemic bias against women on the Internet. All it proves is that there are at least a few journalists who are ignorant, maybe passively sexist. While it may make sense to think that women are shortchanged, there is simply not yet any serious evidence to assert it.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Personally, I don't care about the gender of the blogger...only their posts and if they have interesting and thought provoking observations. One only has to look on the web and witness the deluge of blogs out there but very few are note worthy for me. I like quirky and interesting sites that provide detailed information on various subjects not only on one. I won't name my fav blogs here because I think it's best for one to look for them and be surprised. :)
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Sometimes I don't even notice the gender of the blogger. Also, sometimes being a female blogger can help you get taken more seriously - like in the case of my wife, who got featured for actually because of her gender: http://is.gd/1fvC
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
No wonder Megan Carpentier isn't taken seriously as a political blogger-- she blogs for GLAMOUR, the magazIne that perpetuates the notion that shoe shopping and wearing cosmetics. are vital issues for women.

I know some intelligent women who blog and who are taken seriously, such as brainy, outspoken economist Megan McArdle whose blog, Asymmetrical Information, now appears in the Atlantic:
http://meganmcardle.theatlantic.com/ She's worth reading.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
This is why Digby of Hullaballoo kept her gender hidden for so long. And let's not forget Kathy Sierra.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathy_Sierra

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=19&entry_id=14783

Greg H--this isn't about male to female ratios in the blogosphere; We're talking quality of writing, and even though some of the best blogs are written by women, they are passed over in news articles in favor of male bloggers of less quality.

Chad; So, being featured in a local free 'zine aimed at a very narrow market is the same as getting exposure in a national news article? "Skirt" Charleston is aimed at women. Of course it will feature female bloggers.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Off the top of my head:

Amanda Marcotte, the horrible Michelle Malkin, the equally horrible Pam Gellar (Atlas Shrugs anti-Muslim bigotry blog), Jill Filipovic, Pam Spaulding, Debbie "Ask me why Muslims suck" Schlussel, Jane Hamsher, Ana Marie Cox, Jacqui "Ars Technica" Cheng, Xeni Jardin, Juliette "Baldilocks" Ochieng, Kathryn "K-Lo" Lopez, MISS CELLENIA, Lindsay Beyerstein, Garance Franke-Ruta, Roxanne Cooper, Rebecca Traister, Joan Walsh, Carol Avedon, Lauren Bruce, Tammy Bruce, "Hecate," Susan Hu, "Echidne of the Snakes," the politically confused but otherwise exceptional Beth "Alabama Pachyderm" Cleaver, Melissa "Shakespeare's Sister" McEwan, the criminally stupid La Shawn Barber, Sharon Weinberger, Elizabeth "The Anchoress" Scalia, Dr. Helen "Mrs. Instapundit" Smith, and on and on... And this list (with the exception of Miss C., Sharon W., Jacqui Cheng and Xeni Jardin) only covers political bloggers, left and right.

I read tons of blogs and I certainly don't choose which ones to "take seriously" based on the sex of the poster and I think the rest of the blog-reading world participates similarly. If Blogger X, regardless of his or her sex can maintain a schedule of engaging and provocative posts, then readers will flock to them. If they lose their edge and it starts to show in their work then they may lose some of their audience. I couldn't imagine a reader deciding that their favorite blog has gotten tediously boring but that they would consider the sex of the blogger in question as part of their decision whether to stick around or participate elsewhere.

Vive les bloggers féminins - même les wingnuts belliqueux parmi eux!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I'm a male blogger, been blogging for close to 3 years now and I think I'm not taken seriously. Most of my posting are often left uncommented while my female peers get tons of comments daily.

I don't think it is about gender. It is about how interesting your writing is.

Oh well, there's still a lot I can learn..
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I don't generally care what an author's gender is, unless it's particularly relevant to the content of the post. I appreciate the variety of male and female bloggers whose posts I read every day, on all sorts of topics. I don't find that women are being marginalized in the blogosphere. The nature of the Internet provides the opportunity for everyone's opinions to be heard, and if you have something to say and say it well, people will listen and respond no matter who you are. Certainly I think it's a FAR more balanced forum than any traditional media.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
no, gender does not matter in this realm. the internet is the only working example of the free market, and it should remain that way. there is no telling WHY male bloggers are taken more seriously, but if they are, then they are; it has nothing to do with their gender. there will ALWAYS be a majority of SOMETHING, SOMEWHERE. it is impossible to have a fair share of everything, especially when it's the people who are doing 100% of the voting.

the reason i believe men are taken more seriously is because they generally don't write solely about their feelings. women do. feelings do not generate populatiry, because EVERYONE has feelings. i think women might write more for personal benefit, where men write more for an audience. when you write for an audience, you try to get them involved with the content. now i'm not saying men are better writers, i'm just saying that they don't let their feelings generate their content. and that's OK with me.

the world may (still) be dominated by men, but women will always be better at balancing the checkbook.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
In order to boost my traffic, I've considered using a female identity and posting a profile photo of a hot babe. Not the kind of traffic I ultimately want, but just long enough to get better indexed by Google. I don't know whether male bloggers are taken more seriously than females. How seriously does anyone really want to be taken anyway? On the web, TRAFFIC is king. As a blogger, traffic is most important.

People blog about various things. Any blogger who wants to be taken seriously is probably just too serious. You have to post a lot and be relevant. Google can't tell a blogger's gender.

Oh yeah, I always take MissCellania seriously.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I call bullshit. Some of the most successful bloggers are women: Gina Tripani of Lifehacker, Erin of Unclutter, Megann Marco of Consumerist immediately come to mind. I'm sure there are tons more I don't know about. Isn't one of the major contributors to Mental Floss a woman?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Awwww, thanks, Adam! ;-) (LOL @ "politically confused!")

Frankly, I'm tired of people hand-wringing over not being taken seriously. We're bloggers, fer crying out loud. And of course there are women whose major selling point on their blogs is (quite intentionally) their physical appearance, or more to the point, their sexuality. All while trying to be "serious." (Adam knows of whom I speak.) There are a lot of dudes who will read a blog written by a woman just because they like looking at her picture and imagining she's writing for THEM. It's just the way things are, on the internets and off. Not much you can do about it except keep the pics off the blog, or even do like Digby did (concealing her gender).

I do think there's a big difference in the political bloggers btw left and right, though; a lot of (but certainly NOT ALL) the prominent female bloggers write a lot about so-called "women's issues," with a focus on feminism. Like it or not, I'm sure it's just as off-putting to most men as dudes' blogs with soft porn pics all over them are to us. (That's another entire story, right there - some dudes post that sh*t and wonder why women feel like it's a no-girls-allowed zone? Duh!)

Anyway, I'm not taken "seriously," but then, I've been known to slip goatse links in my posts just because I thought it was funny. ;)
(Don't worry, I'm over that phase.)
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 22 comments




Email This Post to a Friend
"Are Women Bloggers Taken Seriously?"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More