Yay! It's time for our weekly game of whatchamacallit in collaboration with the What is it? blog.
Can you guess what the strange object above is? First correct answer gets a free T-shirt from the Neatorama online shop. If no one gets it right, then the funniest answer will get it instead. Contest rules are simple: place your guess in the comment section, one guess per comment please (but you can guess as many times as you'd like). Post no URL - let others play.
For more clues, check out the What is it? Blog. Good luck!
Update 7/5/08 - the answer is:Bog shoes for a horse, for use in peat bogs or other similar terrain
Congratulations to Baz who got it right first!
Comments (37)
No numbers greater than five? Wow! How do they manage in the jungle with only half the usual supply of fingers and toes?
The desired knowledge comes from -- get this -- reading the damned article.
I just find it hard to believe there are any more truly untouched tribes in the wilds of anywhere. Supposedly the Tasaday had no word for blue. A color they never encountered despite being able to see the sky. These people supposedly went undiscovered until 1970, living in a cave a three hour hike from town.
I am not surprised that there are cultures that see things differently. That is normal. Pick up a bible. ever wonder why 40 keeps showing in days of rain and years in the wilderness? Or Methusela living 900 years?
They were the preliterate middle easterners' descriptions of a "shiteload." But to not pick up on base ten?
Pierre Pica's reluctance to discuss specific facts and figures in the article almost screams "Kippendorf's Tribe" to me.
And the Munduruku have been living peacefully within Brazil since their last makor tribal wars in about 1800.
Maybe of the article linked originated somewhere besides that paragon of journalism, The Guardian, it would have been easier to buy
Instead of our frantic measuring, pacing, dividing...
Ah what bliss---
There is no beginnig, there is no end........
For whatever reason, this reminds me of how our brain is hardwired to overestimate angle of inclination, probably so we don't try to climb steep hills.
So, it seems that the ability to count more than 5 isn't particularly important in evolution, but the ability to discourage oneself from climbing steep hills was (yes, I know that's not how evolution works, so no hate mails, mmkay?)