<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neatorama &#187; extinction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/tag/extinction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:26:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How Gigantopithecus Became Extinct</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2012/01/09/how-gigantopithecus-became-extinct/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2012/01/09/how-gigantopithecus-became-extinct/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animals & Pets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extinct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extinction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paleontology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=58765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We don&#8217;t know about Sasquatch, but we know a giant ape we call Gigantopithecus roamed South Asia until about 300,000 years ago. Gigantopithecus resembled a ten-foot-tall orangutan and weighed about three times as much as a large gorilla. What happened to these great apes? The features of the dentition—large, flat molars, thick dental enamel, a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-58766" title="giganto" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/giganto-150x200.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="200" />We don&#8217;t know about Sasquatch, but we know a giant ape we call <em>Gigantopithecus</em> roamed South Asia until about 300,000 years ago. <em>Gigantopithecus</em> resembled a ten-foot-tall orangutan and weighed about three times as much as a large gorilla. What happened to these great apes?</p>
<blockquote><p>The features of the dentition—large, flat molars, thick dental enamel, a deep, massive jaw—indicate Gigantopithecus probably ate tough, fibrous plants (similar to Paranthropus). More evidence came in 1990, when Russell Ciochon, a biological anthropologist at the University of Iowa, and colleagues (PDF) placed samples of the ape’s teeth under a scanning electron microscope to look for opal phytoliths, microscopic silica structures that form in plant cells. Based on the types of phyoliths the researchers found stuck to the teeth, they concluded Gigantopithecus had a mixed diet of fruits and seeds from the fig family Moraceae and some kind of grasses, probably bamboo. The combination of tough and sugary foods helps explain why so many of the giant ape’s teeth were riddled with cavities. And numerous pits on Gigantopithecus‘s teeth—a sign of incomplete dental development caused by malnuntrition or food shortages—corroborate the bamboo diet. Ciochon’s team noted bamboo species today periodically experience mass die-offs, which affect the health of pandas. The same thing could have happened to Gigantopithecus.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read more about <em>Gigantopithecus</em> at Smithsonian&#8217;s Hominid Hunting blog. <a href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/hominids/2012/01/did-bigfoot-really-exist-how-gigantopithecus-became-extinct/" target="_blank">Link</a></p>
<p>(Image credit: Flickr user <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/87553953@N00/2940699440/" target="_blank">Lindsay Holmwood</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2012/01/09/how-gigantopithecus-became-extinct/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Countries Go Extinct Thanks To Low Birth Rates</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/08/28/when-countries-go-extinct-thanks-to-low-birth-rates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/08/28/when-countries-go-extinct-thanks-to-low-birth-rates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 19:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extinction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2011/08/28/when-countries-go-extinct-thanks-to-low-birth-rates/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given the low birth rates of some countries (I'm looking at you, Hong Kong* and Singapore), it's only a matter of time before they simply depopulate themselves out of existence. But how long do they have? The Economist did the (wild) projection: In Hong Kong, for example, a cohort of 1,000 women is now expected [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
      <p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2011-08/women-fertility.jpg" width="349" height="600"></p>
      <p>Given the low birth rates of some countries (I'm looking at you, Hong 
        Kong* and Singapore), it's only a matter of time before they simply depopulate 
        themselves out of existence. But how long do they have? </p>
      <p>The Economist did the (wild) projection:</p>
      <blockquote>
        <p><em>In Hong Kong, for example, a cohort of 1,000 women is now expected 
          to give birth to just 547 daughters. If nothing changed, those 547 daughters 
          would be succeeded by 299 daughters of their own, and so on. Extrapolating 
          wildly, it would take only 25 generations for Hong Kong&#8217;s female 
          population to shrink from 3.75m to just one. Given that Hong Kong&#8217;s 
          average age of childbearing is 31.4 years, the territory would expect 
          to see the birth of its last woman in the year 2798. </em></p>
        <p><em>By the same unflinching logic, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia and 
          Spain will not see out the next millennium. Even China has only 1,500 
          years left.</em></p>
      </blockquote>
      <p><a href="http://www.economist.com/node/21526776">Link</a></p>
      <p>*Yes, I know that Hong Kong is not an independent country, but it operates 
        like one.</p>
        </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/08/28/when-countries-go-extinct-thanks-to-low-birth-rates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8 Endangered Plant Species</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/08/01/8-endangered-plant-species/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/08/01/8-endangered-plant-species/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 11:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endangered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extinction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=50472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We often post about endangered animals, but plants can go extinct as well. Plant species&#8217; fortunes are affected by the actions of humans and other animals. Consider the strange case of the plant pictured here known as Cabbage on a Stick: Cabbage on a stick is pretty much what it sounds like: a tuft of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-50471" title="cabbage-on-a-stick" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/cabbage-on-a-stick-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" />We often post about endangered animals, but plants can go extinct as well. Plant species&#8217; fortunes are affected by the actions of humans and other animals. Consider the strange case of the plant pictured here known as Cabbage on a Stick:</p>
<blockquote><p>Cabbage on a stick is pretty much what it sounds like: a tuft of leaves that looks like a head of cabbage sitting on top of a thick stick. It&#8217;s also known as alula. In the wild, this plant is only found on the Hawaiian island of Kauai and without the work of botanists, it would be extinct. Because the only insect that could pollinate the cabbage on a stick, a type of hawk moth, doesn&#8217;t exist anymore, the plant species can only reproduce if humans hand-pollinate it. Botanists repelled down cliffs to reach the existing alula, pollinate it, and bring some back with them to grow in nurseries.</p></blockquote>
<p>Other plants are endangered because of over harvesting, environmental encroachment, or even poaching. <a href="http://www.toponlinecolleges.com/blog/2011/8-plant-species-in-danger-of-disappearing/" target="_blank">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/08/01/8-endangered-plant-species/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 Species We&#8217;ve Almost Killed Off For Dumb Reasons</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/07/09/6-species-weve-almost-killed-off-for-dumb-reasons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/07/09/6-species-weve-almost-killed-off-for-dumb-reasons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 07:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jill Harness</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animals & Pets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society & Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extinction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jewelry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2011/07/09/6-species-weve-almost-killed-off-for-dumb-reasons/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The snail shells above are simply gorgeous, as are the jewelry made from them. The only problem? The snails are being driven to extinction just so people can makes earrings and necklaces from them. That&#8217;s not the only idiotic reason humans have been driving certain creatures to extinction, read the rest over at Cracked. Warning: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-48980" title="snail" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/snail-500x166.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="166" /></p>
<p>The snail shells above are simply gorgeous, as are the jewelry made from them. The only problem? The snails are being driven to extinction just so people can makes earrings and necklaces from them. That&#8217;s not the only idiotic reason humans have been driving certain creatures to extinction, read the rest over at Cracked. Warning: some of the language is NSFW.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cracked.com/article_17504_6-species-weve-nearly-killed-off-for-retarded-reasons.html">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/07/09/6-species-weve-almost-killed-off-for-dumb-reasons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 Animals Humans Brought to Extinction</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/02/02/7-animals-humans-brought-to-extinction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/02/02/7-animals-humans-brought-to-extinction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jill Harness</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animals & Pets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neatorama Exclusives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society & Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endangered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extinction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marsupials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pigeons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pupfish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quagga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steller's sea cow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasmanian tiger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=41118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you’re a kid, you know the dinosaurs went extinct, but it seems weird that a creature alive today could suddenly be wiped off the earth tomorrow. I remember the first time I really realized what extinction meant when I went to the San Diego Zoo and saw a picture of the dodo bird on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you’re a kid, you know the dinosaurs went extinct, but it seems weird that a creature alive today could suddenly be wiped off the earth tomorrow. I remember the first time I really realized what extinction meant when I went to the San Diego Zoo and saw a picture of the dodo bird on a sign talking about extinction. I was familiar with the bird from Alice and Wonderland and asked my mom if we could see it while we were at the zoo. When she explained to me that the bird didn’t exist any more, my heart sank.</p>
<p>Even today I am saddened whenever I learn about a species becoming extinct, but the worst part is when you know it was caused by human activity. Here are seven such animals that are no longer on earth thanks to mankind.</p>
<h3>Thylacine</h3>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WMmQexGLYFo?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WMmQexGLYFo?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Also known as the Tasmanian tiger, this carnivore wasn’t related to dogs, tigers or hyenas, as many people believe. It was actually a marsupial, closer related to kangaroos and wallabies than any of those other animals. It was originally found in Australia and New Zealand, but its was essentially extinct in those areas long before Europeans discovered it. Even so, it thrived on the island of Tasmania until European settlers issued began fearing that the animals were eating their livestock. Like wolves, the Tasmanian tiger was often accused of slaughtering sheep in the fields. As a result, the Van Dieman’s Land Company issued a bounty on the creature, offering one pound per adult and ten shillings for each pup.</p>
<p>Scientists have still not been able to verify accusations of the animals eating livestock, but it would be too late to help the thylacines anyway, as the last known individual was captured in 1933 and died in a zoo in 1936. That’s her in the video. Sadly, she died two months before the Tasmanian government enacted a law dedicated to protecting the animals.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thylacine">Source</a> Video <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMmQexGLYFo&amp;feature=related">link</a></p>
<h3>Quagga</h3>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-41113" title="Quagga_photo" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Quagga_photo.jpg" alt="" width="512" height="359" /></p>
<p>While it looks like a strange cross between a horse and a zebra, a quagga was actually a subspecies of a typical plains zebra with a brown rear end and a striped head. It was once found in great numbers in southern Africa until Europeans started hunting the animals for their meat and their hides. It is believed that the last wild quagga was shot in the late 1870s. A number were sent to zoos before that point though and the last captive individual was killed in 1883. At the time, people still believed these were the same as other zebra species, the individuals just had different markings. It wasn’t until after the subspecies was eradicated that people realized the animal had become extinct. Some historians have noted, the story is particularly sad because if the same thing happened in modern times, the breeding programs of zoos could help rebuild the population of the animal and release them back into the wild.</p>
<p>Interestingly, because the animal was so closely related to other subspecies of zebra, South African researchers have attempted a selective breeding program to create a new stock of the animals. The third and forth generation animals created through this project do look similar to the extinct creatures, but scientists debate whether or not looks are enough to declare these animals quaggas.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quagga">Source</a></p>
<h3>Steller&#8217;s Sea Cow</h3>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-41114" title="Hydrodamalis_gigas_drawing" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Hydrodamalis_gigas_drawing.png" alt="" width="450" height="192" /></p>
<p>As a slow-swimming marine mammal that never completely submerged itself and was loaded with blubber, the Steller’s sea cow was doomed from the beginning. These massive herbivores were once abundant in the North Pacific, but aboriginal peoples hunted them until their population was limited to only the Commander Islands. Unfortunately for the sea cow, they were then discovered in 1751 by George Wilhelm Steller on an expedition led by Vitus Bering.</p>
<p>The Stellar sea cows were over 25 feet long. They were slow swimmers who couldn’t submerge themselves. There were only about 1,500 when Europeans first laid eyes on them and it wasn’t long before those remaining were hunted down for food, pelts and blubber, which could be used in oil lamps. Within 27 years of Steller’s discovery, the animals were extinct.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steller%27s_Sea_Cow">Source</a><br />
<span id="more-41118"></span></p>
<h3>Dodo</h3>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-41115" title="740px-Edward's_Dodo" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/740px-Edwards_Dodo.jpg" alt="" width="466" height="378" /></p>
<p>The dodo is probably one of the only animals to be famous because it went extinct. In fact, the bird inspired two expressions related to its eradication, both “dead as a dodo” and “to go the way of the dodo” are commonly used 300 years after the birds disappeared.</p>
<p>The dodo was related to pigeons and doves, but was flightless and much larger than either of these groups of birds. They weighed over forty pounds and stood more than three feet tall. They were native the island of Mauritius and first discovered by Dutch travelers in 1598. The birds weren’t afraid of people, which made them easy targets for hunters, but the importation of dogs, cats, pigs, rats and crab-eating macaques is what really killed the species. Some of the animals brought diseases to the birds, others ate them, but the worst were the macaques, which ate the eggs of the dodos. Within one hundred years of their discovery, the bird was wiped off the earth.</p>
<p>Interestingly, it wasn’t until the 19<sup>th</sup> century that the general populace actually took notice of the animal’s disappearance. Up until that time, many people believed that the animal was a myth, but then the first set of dodo bones were discovered in the Mauritian swamp. After the find, a schoolmaster named George Clarke wrote a report on the bird. The public soon gained interest and the bird quickly became a symbol for the human impact on animals.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodo">Source</a></p>
<h3>Great Auk</h3>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-41116" title="Keulemans-GreatAuk" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Keulemans-GreatAuk.jpg" alt="" width="368" height="506" /></p>
<p>Like the dodo, the great auk was a large, flightless bird. In fact, they were close to the same height and weight, but the auk was a little smaller. While the auk might not have been too coordinated on land, it was an excellent swimmer and could even dive down to 3000 feet under the water, while holding its breath for up to fifteen minutes.</p>
<p>As a black and white sea bird that was an excellent swimmer, the great auk seems to be related to penguins, but the two are not genetically similar. Interestingly though, the auk was responsible for the naming of the penguins. The Spanish and Portuguese called the auks <em>pingüinos</em> and the Welsh called it pengwyn, meaning “little wing.” When European sailors discovered penguins, they thought they were related to auks and thus, gave them the same name.</p>
<p>While auks were relatively widespread throughout the North Atlantic, spreading all the way from New England to Iceland to Norway to Spain, they only had a handful of nesting spots due to their demanding breeding needs. Their breeding areas had to be rocky and isolated with easy access to the ocean and a large population of their favorite fish had to be close by. All of these needs ended up leaving them with no more than 20 breeding colonies, even when they had a massive population. To make matters worse, they only laid one egg per year, so when their numbers did start to dwindle, it took a long while for them to increase their population.</p>
<p>Despite these risks, the great auk was hunted by Native American cultures for over 100,000 years without any problems. The bird was more than just a food source, it was a status symbol. Archeologists even found one native buried with a cloak made from over 200 auk skins –he was certainly a revered member of the tribe while alive.</p>
<p>While many other species were wiped out shortly after being discovered by European explorers, the great auk was used as a source of down feathers in Europe since at least the 8<sup>th</sup> century. Early explorers also used them as an easy source of food and bait since they often ran low on provisions. Even so, the bird managed to survive off of the European coasts until the mid-16<sup>th</sup> century. When these populations were wiped out, scientists realized the great auk was in danger and the bird became one of the first animals to receive legal protection in an attempt to prevent its extinction.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the fact that the bird was acknowledged to be rare garnered intense interest from museums and private collectors who wanted specimens for their collections. They offered high rewards to people who could bring them eggs or skins of the birds. Eggers would collect eggs from the nests, keeping those that were unfertilized and throwing away the rest.</p>
<p>The last colony of auks was located on the island of Eldey off of Iceland. As soon as it was discovered, museums started hiring people to collect the birds from the colony. The last pair was found incubating an egg on July 3, 1844. The parents were strangled by two of the collectors and just to ensure there would never be another great auk, a third man made sure to stomp on their egg.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_auk">Source</a></p>
<h3>Passenger Pigeon</h3>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-41117" title="375px-Ectopistes_migratoriusMCN2P28CA" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/375px-Ectopistes_migratoriusMCN2P28CA.jpg" alt="" width="375" height="600" /></p>
<p>When Europeans first arrived in America, the passenger pigeons were present in such great numbers that it was said to take several hours for a flock to fly overhead. The flocks were often more than a mile wide and 300 miles long and made up of more than two billion birds. The birds went from being one of the most abundant animals on earth in the 19<sup>th</sup> century to being completely extinct by the 20<sup>th</sup> century.</p>
<p>The bird’s population started to decrease as Europeans started chopping down forests to make way for civilization, but even this didn’t thin their population too much. But by the 1800’s, people realized they could feed their slaves and servants passenger pigeon for practically nothing. Whole boxcars of pigeons were shipped to the cities, where a pair of pigeons would go for two cents.</p>
<p>If the passenger pigeons were like most other birds, they wouldn’t have been so easy to wipe out. Unfortunately, they were incredibly social and could not breed unless they were in a communal breeding area, which would stretch hundreds of miles –each tree could contain up to one hundred nests. Some nesting sites were estimated to hold more than 100 million individuals. This meant that hunters could go to the nesting sites and wipe out the birds at record numbers. At one of the last major nesting sites, there was a five-month long hunt that would generally result in the deaths of about 50,000 birds per day.</p>
<p>By the 1890s, it was obvious that the passenger pigeon was seriously endangered. The Michigan legislature enacted a law outlawing the killing of the birds within two miles of a nesting area, but authorities rarely enforced the rule. By this time, it was already too late anyway. The birds had to have massive nesting colonies in order to successfully breed and there were too few pigeons left. Some people even tried to help the population through captive breeding programs, but there were just too few birds to coax the animals into mating. The last passenger pigeon died in the Cincinnati Zoo in 1914.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passenger_Pigeon">Source</a></p>
<h3>Tecopa Pupfish</h3>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-41112" title="Tecopapupfish" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Tecopapupfish.png" alt="" width="300" height="166" /></p>
<p>It might not be as exciting as a Tasmanian tiger, but the Tecopa Pupfish has an important role in the history of extinction, as it was the first animal to be officially declared extinct according to the Endangered Species Act of 1973. The Tecopa Pupfish was endemic only to the Tecoopa Hot Springs of the Mojave Desert. They were first discovered in 1942 and completely wiped out within a few decades after the hot springs were canalized into bath houses. It was officially delisted from the endangered species list in 1981.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tecopa_Pupfish">Source<br />
</a></p>
<p>As an animal lover, this was a really hard article to write, but I do think it is important to learn from our history so we can help protect animals that are currently at risk. This is only a small sampling of the many animals that humans have brought to extinction, but with any luck, we can help stop that number from increasing in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/02/02/7-animals-humans-brought-to-extinction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giant Yummy Eggs Killed Off the Elephant Bird</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/12/19/giant-yummy-eggs-kill-off-the-elephant-bird/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/12/19/giant-yummy-eggs-kill-off-the-elephant-bird/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animals & Pets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[egg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elephant bird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extinction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sir David Attenborough]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2010/12/19/giant-yummy-eggs-kill-off-the-elephant-bird/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photo: De Agostini Picture Library/BBC Scientists have put forth various theories to explain the extinction of the giant Elephant Bird, the largest bird to ever live on Earth, including climate change and hunting by humans. The truth, it turns out, can be summed up in two words: yummy eggs. Sir David Attenborough explains: Recent archaeological [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2010-12/elephant-bird-egg.jpg" width="500" height="312"><br />Photo: De Agostini Picture Library/BBC</p>
<p>Scientists have put forth various theories to explain the extinction of the giant Elephant Bird, the largest bird to ever live on Earth, including climate change and hunting by humans. The truth, it turns out, can be summed up in two words: yummy eggs.</p>
<p>Sir David Attenborough explains:</p>
<blockquote><p> <em>Recent archaeological evidence has revealed the fragments of elephant bird egg shells among the remains of human fires, suggesting that the eggs, which are 180 times bigger than a chicken egg, regularly provided food for entire families.</em></p>
<p><em>Sir David says: &quot;I doubt it was hunted to extinction &#8211; anyone who has seen an ostrich in a zoo knows that it has a kick which can open a man&#8217;s stomach and an enraged elephant bird, many times the size of an ostrich, must have been a truly formidable opponent.<br />&quot;I suspect it was its egg. They may not have been able to tackle an adult bird, but they could have taken its eggs which would have been a huge source of food.<br />&quot;Even if the bird itself was held in awe or fear by the people here, it&#8217;s unlikely the eggs were &#8211; and that would have meant the gradual disappearance of this unique giant.&quot;</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/8211536/David-Attenborough-and-the-mystery-of-the-elephant-bird.html">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/12/19/giant-yummy-eggs-kill-off-the-elephant-bird/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Evidence Suggests Dinosaurs Were Wiped Out by Two Meteor Strikes, Not One</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/08/27/new-evidence-suggests-dinosaurs-were-wiped-out-by-two-meteor-strikes-not-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/08/27/new-evidence-suggests-dinosaurs-were-wiped-out-by-two-meteor-strikes-not-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 01:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Farrier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dinosaurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extinction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paleontology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=35358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since 1980, paleontologists have suggested that a terrible meteorite impact millions of years ago radically altered the Earth&#8217;s climate and killed off the dinosaur population. Now a study led by David Jolley of Aberdeen University proposes that there was a second major impact a few thousand years after the first: In the current study, scientists [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/dinosaurs-150x112.jpg" alt="" title="dinosaurs" width="150" height="112" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-35359" />Since 1980, paleontologists have suggested that a terrible meteorite impact millions of years ago radically altered the Earth&#8217;s climate and killed off the dinosaur population.  Now a study led by David Jolley of Aberdeen University proposes that there was a second major impact a few thousand years after the first:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the current study, scientists examined the &#8220;pollen and spores&#8221; of fossil plants in the layers of mud that infilled the crater. They found that immediately after the impact, ferns quickly colonised the devastated landscape.</p>
<p>Ferns have an amazing ability to bounce back after catastrophe. Layers full of fern spores &#8211; dubbed &#8220;fern spikes&#8221; &#8211; are considered to be a good &#8220;markers&#8221; of past impact events.</p>
<p>However, there was an unexpected discovery in store for the scientists.</p>
<p>They located a second &#8220;fern spike&#8221; in a layer one metre above the first, suggesting another later impact event.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11112417">Link</a> via <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/d67x5/the_dinosaurs_were_wiped_out_65_million_years_ago/">reddit</a> | Photo by Flickr user <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/moonlightbulb/">moonlightbulb</a> used under Creative Commons license</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/08/27/new-evidence-suggests-dinosaurs-were-wiped-out-by-two-meteor-strikes-not-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mammoth Ate Own Poo</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/06/08/mammoth-ate-own-poo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/06/08/mammoth-ate-own-poo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 22:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animals & Pets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coprophagia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extinction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mammoth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2010/06/08/mammoth-ate-own-poo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why did woolly mammoth go extinct? Scientists discovered that the none-too-smart animal enjoyed &#8211; and I quote &#8211; &#34;poo-snack&#34;: &#8230; a team led by Bas van Geel of the University of Amsterdam found fungus spores deep inside a piece of mammoth dung that can only grow on the outside of dung. Only way that can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2010-06/mammoth-poo.jpg" width="150" height="123" class="imageleft">Why did woolly mammoth go extinct? Scientists discovered that the none-too-smart animal enjoyed &#8211; and I quote &#8211; &quot;poo-snack&quot;:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8230; a team led by Bas van Geel of the University of Amsterdam found fungus spores deep inside a piece of mammoth dung that can only grow on the outside of dung. Only way that can happen is if the mammoth eats the fungus, which means eating poo. Their work is in press in the journal <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&#038;_udi=B6VBC-4YTM6DP-2&#038;_user=7162258&#038;_coverDate=04/10/2010&#038;_rdoc=30&#038;_fmt=high&#038;_orig=browse&#038;_srch=doc-info(%23toc%235923%239999%23999999999%2399999%23FLA%23display%23Articles)&#038;_cdi=5923&#038;_sort=d&#038;_docanchor=&#038;_ct=68&#038;_acct=C000047720&#038;_version=1&#038;_urlVersion=0&#038;_userid=7162258&#038;md5=2c5ff3dde43007374c723d79d7f5e1a7">Quaternary Science Reviews</a>.</em></p>
<p><em>This is the second time evidence has been found that mammoths enjoyed poo-snacks &#8212; &quot;coprophagy&quot; to scientists &#8212; the first was in 2006. In some ways it&#8217;s even more important than the first discovery, though, because it means the initial finding wasn&#8217;t a fluke: mammoths made a habit of eating their own excrement.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>It may sound gross to you or me, but <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coprophagia">coprophagia</a> (that&#8217;s the fancy scientific word for eating poo) may actually serve a valid purpose: </p>
<blockquote><p><em>Microbes that feasted on poo left behind high concentrations of vitamin K, B12, and B7, making mammoth pies a great way to get essential nutrients. That would&#8217;ve gone double for any time when food was scarce and/or the animals were stressed and in need of a prehistoric PowerBar.</em></p>
<p><em>&quot;The indication that the adult mammoth had eaten feces (its own or that of another&#8217;s) is interesting, but not remarkably strange. Young elephants eat the feces of their mother to obtain the necessary bacteria for the proper digestion of the vegetation found on the savanna.</em></p>
<p><em>&quot;This behavior may have a marked effect upon the type and function of the intestinal flora. Coprophagy is an important means of making a variety of nutrients synthesized by intestinal microflora available to animals.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35241732/ns/technology_and_science-science/">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/06/08/mammoth-ate-own-poo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China&#8217;s Last Tiger Eaten</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/23/chinas-last-tiger-eaten/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/23/chinas-last-tiger-eaten/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animals & Pets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endagered species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extinction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tiger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=28439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s no way of knowing whether the tiger that made a meal for five men was really the last Indochinese tiger in China, but no one has seen any others in years. Kang Wannian of Yunnan Province in China claims he killed the tiger in self-defense last February. Then he ate it. The only known [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="imageleft" src="http://static.neatorama.com/misscellania/150indochinesetiger.jpg" alt="" />There&#8217;s no way of knowing whether the tiger that made a meal for five men was <em>really</em> the last Indochinese tiger in China, but no one has seen any others in years. Kang Wannian of Yunnan Province in China claims he killed the tiger in self-defense last February. Then he ate it.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The only known wild Indochinese tiger in China, photographed in 2007 at the same reserve, has not been seen since Kang&#8217;s meal, the Yunnan-based newspaper Life News reported earlier this month.</em></p>
<p><em>The paper quoted the provincial Forestry Bureau as saying there was no evidence the tiger was the last one in China.</em></p>
<p><em>A local court sentenced Kang to 10 years for killing a rare animal plus two years for illegal possession of firearms, the local web portal Yunnan.cn reported. Prosecutors said Kang did not need a gun to gather clams.</em></p>
<p><em>Four villagers who helped Kang dismember the tiger and ate its meat were also sentenced from three to four years for &#8220;covering up and concealing criminal gains&#8221;, the report said. </em></p></blockquote>
<p>The Indochinese tiger is on the brink of extinction, with small populations in Laos, Vietnam. Cambodia, Thailand, and Burma. <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/6864072/Chinas-last-tiger-is-eaten.html" target="_blank">Link</a> -via <a href="http://arbroath.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Arbroath</a></p>
<p>(image credit: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Indochinese_Tiger.jpg" target="_blank">Cburnett</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/23/chinas-last-tiger-eaten/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great Barrier Reef: Gone in 20 Years</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/07/17/great-barrier-reef-gone-in-20-years/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/07/17/great-barrier-reef-gone-in-20-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Veron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extinction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Barrier Reef]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/07/17/great-barrier-reef-gone-in-20-years/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First it was bluefin tuna, then Playboy bunnies, then the world&#8217;s wheat crop. Now the Great Barrier Reef is going to be gone in 20 years, according to marine scientist Charlie Veron: Charlie Veron, former chief scientist of the Australian Institute of Marine Science, told The Times: &#8220;There is no way out, no loopholes. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/images/2009-07/great-barrier-reef.jpg" width="150" height="196" class="imageleft">First it was <a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/17/eat-your-sushi-now-tuna-will-be-wiped-out-by-2012/">bluefin tuna</a>, then <a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/30/playboy-bunnies-close-to-extinction/">Playboy bunnies</a>, then <a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/14/the-time-bomb-that-can-wipe-out-the-worlds-wheat-crop/">the world&#8217;s wheat crop</a>. Now the Great Barrier Reef is going to be gone in 20 years, according to marine scientist Charlie Veron:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Charlie Veron, former chief scientist of the Australian Institute of Marine Science, told The Times: &#8220;There is no way out, no loopholes. The Great Barrier Reef will be over within 20 years or so.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><em>Once carbon dioxide had hit the levels predicted for between 2030 and 2060, all coral reefs were doomed to extinction, he said. &#8220;They would be the world&#8217;s first global ecosystem to collapse. I have the backing of every coral reef scientist, every research organisation. I&#8217;ve spoken to them all. This is critical. This is reality.&#8221; </em> </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Frank Pope of The Times Online has the interview: <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6652866.ece">Link</a></p>
<p>Everything&#8217;s going extinct like it&#8217;s going out of style! What&#8217;s (or who&#8217;s) next? <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/video/entertainment_scientists_warn">Miley Cyrus</a>?</p>
<p>From the Neatoshop: <a href="http://shop.neatorama.com/product-info.php?thesaurus-dinosaur-extinction-pid265.html">Having Great Vocab Didn&#8217;t Save the Thesaurus From Extinction </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/07/17/great-barrier-reef-gone-in-20-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Only 2,000 Left &#8211; The Rainbow That Can Fly</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/12/only-2000-left-the-rainbow-that-can-fly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/12/only-2000-left-the-rainbow-that-can-fly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Queuebot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animals & Pets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extinction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rainbow finch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/12/only-2000-left-the-rainbow-that-can-fly/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The remarkable Rainbow Finch is found in Australia yet there are only around two thousand of them left in the wild.&#160; Although conservation attempts are ongoing the question now seems to be whether or not this beautiful species will persevere for very much longer in its own original habitat.&#160; There is something about the Rainbow [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<div class="imageleft"><img src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/upcoming/thumbs/2009/04/12/Only-2000-Left-The-Rainbow-That-Can-Fly-m.jpg" alt=""/></div>
<p>The remarkable Rainbow Finch is found in Australia yet there are only around two thousand of them left in the wild.&nbsp; Although conservation attempts are ongoing the question now seems to be whether or not this beautiful species will persevere for very much longer in its own original habitat.&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.webphemera.com/2009/04/only-2000-left-rainbow-that-can-fly.html"><p><em>There is something about the Rainbow Finch that makes it look like an animal made up, using Photoshop, for an April Fool joke. The colors seem too bright to be real and each garish hue ends abruptly to be replaced by one equally as preposterous for a wild animal. The main part of its body looks like some psychedelic Neapolitan ice cream.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.webphemera.com/2009/04/only-2000-left-rainbow-that-can-fly.html">Link</a> &#8211; via <a href="http://www.webphemera.com">webphemera</a></p>
<p>From the <a href="http://www.neatorama.com/upcoming">Upcoming <img src="http://static.neatorama.com/img7/NeatoQ.jpg" class="middle" align="absmiddle"/>ueue</a>, submitted by <img alt='' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/3f28f98cd1148889cadd2ffd8151c390?s=16&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D16&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-16' height='16' width='16'  class="middle" align="absmiddle"/> <span title="member since January 30th, 2009 @ 12:56:10" class="profilelink">taliesyn30</span>.</p>
<div style="clear:both"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/04/12/only-2000-left-the-rainbow-that-can-fly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did A Comet Wipe Out The Mammoths?</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/02/did-a-comet-wipe-out-the-mammoths/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/02/did-a-comet-wipe-out-the-mammoths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extinction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice age]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=21736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists have long pondered an event 12,900 years ago that caused the disappearance of the Clovis people of North America and the extinction of large mammals such as the mammoth, mastodon, saber-toothed cat, and the North American camel. One theory is that a comet broke into fragments and showered burning material over the continent. Now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://static.neatorama.com/misscellania/150nanodiamonds.jpg" class="imageleft" />Scientists have long pondered an event 12,900 years ago that caused the disappearance of the Clovis people of North America and the extinction of large mammals such as the mammoth, mastodon, saber-toothed cat, and the North American camel. One theory is that a comet broke into fragments and showered burning material over the continent. Now there&#8217;s some evidence -a layer of nanodiamonds have been found at a layer of sediment buried 12,900 years ago. The diamonds could have only been formed by a high-pressure high-temperature event.  </p>
<blockquote><p><em>These diamonds are measured in nanometers &#8212; mere billionths of meters &#8212; and one of them would not suffice for an engagement ring unless the recipient had an extremely small finger. Indeed, these diamonds are visible only with the aid of the most advanced microscopes.</p>
<p>The wide distribution of the nanodiamonds could be a sign that the comet broke into pieces in space and that the fragments burned up explosively over a broad area of North America. The heat and pressure from the event transformed carbon on the planet&#8217;s surface into the tiny diamonds, the scientists said.</p>
<p>&#8220;Imagine these fireballs exploding in the air. A Clovis hunter standing and looking at these things would have seen a canopy of fire as these things came in and exploded,&#8221; said Allen West, a geophysicist and one of the paper&#8217;s co-authors. &#8220;There would have been no sound. There would have been massive explosions. Brilliant light, brighter than the sun. There would have been radiant heat &#8212; it would have been capable, at the very least, of giving him serious burns and, at the maximum, of incinerating him.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>This theory would explain the climate change at the time, when the warming planet was plunged into another, shorter ice age. Skeptics cite lack of a crater or other surface evidence in refuting the theory. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/01/AR2009010101490.html">Link</a> -via <a href="http://digg.com/">Digg</a>  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/02/did-a-comet-wipe-out-the-mammoths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:11:14 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.6777 seconds -->
