<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neatorama &#187; development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/tag/development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:57:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Defying Developers: Buildings of the Resistance</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/16/defying-developers-buildings-of-the-resistance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/16/defying-developers-buildings-of-the-resistance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Urbanist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home & Garden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Odd News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=24644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Buildings are creatively converted or utterly demolished all the time to make room for highways and other large-scale civic problems, but the laws vary on what can be done when a single hold-out structure stands alone against a sea of fat-cat developers, builders and architects who all want nothing more but for them to move.
Sometimes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/nail-house.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-24642" title="nail-house" src="http://www.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/nail-house.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="250" /></a></p>
<p>Buildings are <a href="http://dornob.com/category/architecture/converted/">creatively converted</a> or <a href="http://weburbanist.com/2008/03/05/16-sweet-and-scary-building-demolitions-in-action/">utterly demolished</a> all the time to make room for highways and other large-scale civic problems, but the laws vary on what can be done when a single hold-out structure stands alone against a sea of fat-cat developers, builders and architects who all want nothing more but for them to move.</p>
<p>Sometimes they successfully <a href="http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2007-04/03/content_842221.htm">force out residents</a> or bribe them with offers that range up to 20 times the value of the home and real estate &#8211; but in many cases they simply <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/beatnikside/3568090854/sizes/l/">have to give up</a> and build around them, creating so-called &#8216;nail houses&#8217; that stand apart from their surroundings.</p>
<p>In some cases, these incredible stand-alone structures have huge fan bases of individuals who applaud their willingness to stand up for their property.</p>
<p><a href="http://deputy-dog.com/2009/06/6-extraordinarily-stubborn-nail-houses.html" target="_blank">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/16/defying-developers-buildings-of-the-resistance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Facebook Bad For Young Brains?</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/02/23/is-facebook-bad-for-young-brains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/02/23/is-facebook-bad-for-young-brains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Baby & Kids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book & Lit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attention span]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/02/23/is-facebook-bad-for-young-brains/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s another reason not to use Facebook: social networking websites may actually harm brains of its young users!
Sites such as Facebook, Twitter and Bebo are said to shorten attention spans, encourage instant gratification and make young people more self-centred.
The claims from neuroscientist Susan Greenfield will make disturbing reading for the millions whose social lives depend [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/images/2009-02/susan-greenfield.jpg" width="150" height="155" class="imageleft">Here&#8217;s another reason not to use Facebook: social networking websites may actually harm brains of its young users!</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Sites such as Facebook, Twitter and Bebo are said to shorten attention spans, encourage instant gratification and make young people more self-centred.</em></p>
<p><em>The claims from neuroscientist <a href="http://www.pharm.ox.ac.uk/academics/greenfield">Susan Greenfield</a> will make disturbing reading for the millions whose social lives depend on logging on to their favourite websites each day. [...]</em></p>
<p><em>&#8216;We know how small babies need constant reassurance that they exist,&#8217; she told the Mail yesterday.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8216;My fear is that these technologies are infantilising the brain into the state of small children who are attracted by buzzing noises and bright lights, who have a small attention span and who live for the moment.&#8217;</em></p>
<p><em>Her comments echoed those she made during a House of Lords debate earlier this month. Then she argued that exposure to computer games, instant messaging, chat rooms and social networking sites could leave a generation with poor attention spans. </em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1153583/Social-websites-harm-childrens-brains-Chilling-warning-parents-neuroscientist.html">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/02/23/is-facebook-bad-for-young-brains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Negative CO2 Emitting Cement</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/01/negative-co2-emitting-cement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/01/negative-co2-emitting-cement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 21:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jill Harness</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everything Else]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/01/negative-co2-emitting-cement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People love to overlook certain things that pollute, just because we don&#8217;t have an alternative yet. We never talk about the emissions caused from cement, which produces more carbon dioxide than the entire aviation industry. Did you know that 5% of all CO2 production comes from cement?
There is finally an alternative. The British engineering firm, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/1230751559-grey_portland_cement.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-21724" title="1230751559-grey_portland_cement" src="http://www.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/1230751559-grey_portland_cement-150x114.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="114" /></a>People love to overlook certain things that pollute, just because we don&#8217;t have an alternative yet. We never talk about the emissions caused from cement, which produces more carbon dioxide than the entire aviation industry. Did you know that 5% of all CO2 production comes from cement?</p>
<p>There is finally an alternative. The British engineering firm, Novacem, has created a new cement that uses magnesium silicates, which emit no carbon dioxide when they are heated. As the cement hardens, it absorbs CO2. In all, it removes about .6 tons of carbon dioxide per ton of cement used.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/dec/31/cement-carbon-emissions">Link</a> Via <a href="http://www.good.is/?p=14392">Good</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/01/negative-co2-emitting-cement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 7/15 queries in 0.239 seconds using memcached

Served from: 10.14.45.4 @ 2009-11-25 03:55:02 -->