Roman Multitool

By John Farrier in Archaeology, Society & Culture on Nov 6, 2010 at 12:18 pm

The Fitzwilliam Museum in Cambridge, UK, holds a Roman multitool that dates back to the 3rd Century C.E. When unfolded, it has a fork, spatula, pick, spike, and knife blade.

Link | Photo: Fitzwilliam Museum


Email This Post
Tweet This Post 
Share This Post on Facebook

Tags: ,


Neat stuff from the NeatoShop:


  1. Edward
    Nov 6th, 2010 at 2:11 pm

    It is news to me that the Romans used forks for eating. As far as I know (along with a small bit of Internet research) forks were only used by the Romans for carving and had two blades.

    Since this is what it is, perhaps it has the wrong date and/or cultural attribution.

  2. Jesús Garrido
    Nov 6th, 2010 at 2:47 pm

    me gusta la desazón visual que me produce la imagen

  3. AlexMMR
    Nov 6th, 2010 at 3:01 pm

    I’m fairly certain the fork wasn’t introduced until around the 1600′s. And it took a long time to be accepted as a tool for eating. The church was vehemently opposed to its use claiming that God already provided us with the best tools for eating (our hands) and to imply that a fork was an improvement was akin to blasphemy.

  4. themonkey
    Nov 6th, 2010 at 3:35 pm

    fork schmork. that is Neat, O’Rama.

  5. Prairie Dog
    Nov 6th, 2010 at 5:42 pm

    Hmm, ok, according to Wiki, forks are referenced in the old Testament, were used by the ancient Greeks AND that the Romans used them. Furthermore that there were many examples of Roman forks to be found. A casual search yielded a Roman fork that was awfully small if it was just for serving. So unless there is a rather widespread conspiracy sponsored by the Pro-Forks-For-Romans-League, I think a travel fork might be something a Roman might actually have.

  6. thaxted
    Nov 6th, 2010 at 6:57 pm

    That is a riggers knife and marlin spike if ever I saw one. This was a Roman sailors rigging tool. Even the spoon could be used as a Fido.

  7. Edward
    Nov 6th, 2010 at 9:22 pm

    No question about neat. However, please allow me to correct myself. Forks have tines, not blades.

  8. Johnny Cat
    Nov 6th, 2010 at 9:53 pm

    No spoon? No spork? Not even a spoonacho?

  9. Brycemeister
    Nov 7th, 2010 at 11:44 am

    That’s the coolest thing I’ve e’er clapped eyes upon! Is it too late to get one?

    Oh wait, too late it is…

  10. Jeremy
    Nov 7th, 2010 at 7:44 pm

    Too late. I think not.

    The photos give enough detail for a skilled craftsman/smith to make one. Apply at your nearest Reenactor cutlery supplier

  11. fused
    Nov 8th, 2010 at 1:14 am

    It’s a cool item for sure.

    @alexMMR, blasphemy? it was blast for me, was it a blast for you too?

  12. RDW
    Nov 8th, 2010 at 7:58 am

    ‘The photos give enough detail for a skilled craftsman/smith to make one. Apply at your nearest Reenactor cutlery supplier’

    They’re ahead of us:

    http://www.armillum.com/product.php?id_product=289

  13. Gauldar
    Nov 8th, 2010 at 10:21 am

    @Johnny Cat

    Might be difficult considering they didn’t have corn. I suppose it could be made a flatbread, and allow you to get a nice mouthful of delicious garum. Mmm, fermented fish pasty goodness!

  14. slug
    Nov 8th, 2010 at 8:15 pm

    Made by Leatherman.

  15. Bill Rowe
    Nov 12th, 2010 at 5:14 pm

    does anyone else smell shenanigans? Is there any other evidence of folding tools from the third century?


Keep track of the comments with Comment RSS

Don't Miss: New Stuff | Bestsellers | The Cute Store
                   Funny T-Shirts | Zombie Shop

Need a gift? Get unforgettable gifts for:
Geeks | Pranksters | Kids | Hipsters | Shutterbugs

Lijit Search

Old school? Bookmark us! RSS Feed Twitter Facebook Page