Do Ugly People Commit More Crime?

By Alex in Crime & Law on Jul 29, 2010 at 11:46 pm

Do ugly people commit more crime? Yes, statistically speaking anyhow.

Before you chalk this one up as the discredited pseudoscience of physiognomy rearing its ugly head, consider the argument behind a paper by Georgia State University economist (and dashingly handsome guy) Erdal Tekin:

Ugly people are more likely to break the law. This is the statistically based conclusion in a paper published in The Review of Economics and Statistics entitled Ugly Criminals [...]

This takes us to the modern Ugly Criminals study, which is subtler than it might seem. It is based on an anonymous questionnaire combined with equally anonymous ratings of the subject’s attractiveness. It shows a small but significant correlation between attractiveness, or the lack of it, and criminality. The most unattractive segment are 1.5 per cent more likely to have committed robbery, 2.2 per cent more likely to have committed assault, and 3 per cent more likely to have sold drugs. Or to have been caught doing so, at any rate.

The authors note previous work showing how more attractive people are more successful in their careers and earn more. This puts less attractive people at a disadvantage in the world of work and nudges them towards criminal alternatives. In addition, less attract ive people suffer socially, make fewer friends and build less of what the authors call “human capital”. They are therefore not as sympathetic to others and have less of an investment in society. This effect is far more pronounced in females, suggesting that they are judged on their appearance to a much greater degree.

Links: Article at Fortean Times | The paper Ugly Criminals by H. Naci Mocan and Erdal Tekin [PDF]


Email This Post
Tweet This Post 
Share This Post on Facebook

Tags: , , , ,


Neat stuff from the NeatoShop:


  1. Romeo Vitelli
    Jul 30th, 2010 at 12:09 am

    Don’t forget Cesare Lombroso. His biological theories of crime often invoked physical abnormalities of criminals as proof of their genetic inferiority.

  2. Dewey
    Jul 30th, 2010 at 12:26 am

    It may be possible that attractive people are more likely to get away with crimes, not necessarily commit less?

  3. AmiBambini
    Jul 30th, 2010 at 12:42 am

    A hard life also leaves it’s mark on people’s faces and bodies. Hunger, substance abuse, a life experience of aggression and want.. doesn’t tend to leave many people looking pretty.

  4. Sousa
    Jul 30th, 2010 at 4:02 am

    this is a stupid study… even though prety faces have an “easier” life than an ugly one, they get it all “free”

  5. stonerindiekid
    Jul 30th, 2010 at 4:44 am

    I guess it’s more to do with low self-esteem and the belief that these ugly folk will achieve less, and thus are more likely to be opportunist.

    If we look at many of today’s entrepeneurs will be hard pushed to find an attractive one amongst them. This may well be due to that us more attractive dudes feel that we don’t have to do so much to pull a fitty!

  6. ted
    Jul 30th, 2010 at 5:12 am

    This implies a cause and effect. How do we know the cause of beauty isn’t wealth?

    Wealthier people appear more attractive. They’re able to spend to make themselves more attractive, better dressed, clean, etc…

    The premise is stupid.

  7. Sue Dunham
    Jul 30th, 2010 at 5:21 am

    Dick Tracey certainly agrees with this theory.

  8. Twist
    Jul 30th, 2010 at 7:39 am

    That’s a simple error of sociology. People in the higher socioeconomic strata have more access to lives and products to make them “attractive” and white collar crime goes highly undetected because it is the people with money who drive the system. Thus, people with less money, harsher lifestyles, and less power are those who are likely to be caught in their acts of deviance.

  9. SuperCrap
    Jul 30th, 2010 at 9:35 am

    Agree with AmiBambini, ted, and Twist. Poverty is awfully hard on a person’s looks and wealth the opposite. It would be strange if criminals didn’t tend to be uglier, THAT would require some explanation!

  10. archibot
    Jul 30th, 2010 at 11:06 am

    Since it says this data is from a SURVEY it kind of invalidates all of you “ugly people are more likely to get caught” explanations

    But it’s still a stupid study.

  11. Stephen Hawkins
    Jul 30th, 2010 at 11:34 am

    This study is a great example of the reverse causation fallacy. It assumes that ugliness magically causes people to commit crimes, rather than reaching the simpler and more obvious conclusion that people’s lifestyles can affect their attractiveness. It’s like those studies that claim that violent video games magically cause people to commit violent crimes. Luckily, most studies now support the simpler and more obvious solution: violent people are more likely to enjoy violent video games. Sadly, too many politicians remain ignorant of this.

  12. ozoozol
    Jul 30th, 2010 at 1:35 pm

    Clicked through to say what Dewey already said


Keep track of the comments with Comment RSS

Don't Miss: New Stuff | Bestsellers | The Cute Store
                   Funny T-Shirts

Need a gift? Get unforgettable gifts for:
Geeks | Pranksters | Kids | Hipsters | Shutterbugs

Lijit Search

Old school? Bookmark us! RSS Feed Twitter Facebook Page