F-35 Performs Its First Vertical Landing

By John Farrier in Video Clips, Weapons & War on Mar 19, 2010 at 4:08 pm


(YouTube Link)

The F-35, the next generation of vertical takeoff and landing jet fighter, developed by Lockheed-Martin, performed its first vertical landing yesterday:

Yesterday at 1 P.M., after descending from a 150-foot-high hover, the test plane touched down on the tarmac at the Patuxent River Naval Air Station. This is a significant step forward for the F-35, as its vertical takeoff and landing capability are crucial to the fighter’s role as a replacement for the aging Harrier jet.

The test began with a short runway takeoff at 93 miles per hour, after which the pilot swung around, positioned the plane over the runway, and lowered it down. The test pilot, a former Royal Air Force aviator with experience piloting VSTOL planes, said he found landing the F-35 vertically far easier than landing older planes, like the Harrier, the same way.

Link


Email This Post
Tweet This Post 
Share This Post on Facebook

Tags: , ,


Neat stuff from the NeatoShop:


  1. Sebastian
    Mar 19th, 2010 at 4:52 pm

    Beautifully done!
    It looks more dignified and relaxed than normal landings on aircraft carriers ;)
    Though the plane isn’t really a looker..

  2. Juice
    Mar 19th, 2010 at 4:59 pm

    And a steal at only $83 million per plane!

  3. timageous
    Mar 19th, 2010 at 5:20 pm

    83 million and its the loudest attack aircraft in the arsenal. Pretty cool until its in your backyard. Who the hell are we fighting that we still need beasts like these? Whatever, just keep these hovering albatroses out of Tucson! Its bad enough with the F-16s and A-10s!

  4. I want to believe
    Mar 19th, 2010 at 6:36 pm

    This is OLD… Want to see real capabilities;
    Look into what no one believes…

    The Truth is: Nowhere.

    The Truth is: Now here!

  5. terrabyte
    Mar 19th, 2010 at 6:58 pm

    What am I missing. Didn’t the British Harriers do this twenty years ago?

  6. otterly
    Mar 19th, 2010 at 7:42 pm

    Hey cool!!!! By the way, my kid is on the verge of going to school only 4 days a week due to severe cutbacks for education. But I sure am glad my country has money for hovering jet fighters. BRB Gotta file my taxes.. God Bless America

  7. Johnny Cat
    Mar 19th, 2010 at 9:54 pm

    This footage of a Harrier jet making a landing on an AC in 2007 is surreal to me, as I used to serve on an AC before that was the big new thing. The vertical takeoff is another example of the technology in an early phase.

  8. Skipweasel
    Mar 20th, 2010 at 1:42 am

    I presume the reason he found it easier is the advances in avionics that do a lot of the fine jiggling for you.

  9. blitz
    Mar 20th, 2010 at 7:57 pm

    terrabyte:

    I haven’t done any research on this new jet, but the Harrier has crashed many times and I’d guess that this is an improved, safer version.

  10. BikerRay
    Mar 21st, 2010 at 5:41 am

    terrabyte: I worked on the Harrier HUD in 1970, that’s 40 years to come up with a plane that does the same thing. And I would hope in 40 years they could make something that was easier to fly. The Harrier impressed me, this is just more of the same.

  11. C.A.
    Mar 21st, 2010 at 7:28 am

    I love how many negative comments are on this post. This is astonishing to me. It may be even more astonishing that others aren’t impressed. The science behind something like this is awesome.

  12. Kalel
    Mar 22nd, 2010 at 12:26 am

    Be kind now! This could well be the last fighter jet to have a human pilot.

  13. Sandman
    Mar 22nd, 2010 at 3:53 am

    This thing looks amazing!

  14. Matt Kaufman
    Mar 22nd, 2010 at 12:57 pm

    Piloted aircraft? How quaint…

  15. Sebastian
    Mar 23rd, 2010 at 12:44 am

    Ah come on people! Yes the harrier can do it too, so what?? people were able to run 200,000 years ago, and we’re still watching the olympic games.

    What’s more, this aircraft can do a hell of a lot more than a harrier (like supersonic flight, for one), it’s not just “a plane that hovers”.

    By the way if you don’t like planes that hover, there are two other versions that don’t, so be happy!

    @otterly:
    Stop bitching, this is the product of the JSF program, which means it is funded by the USA, Britain, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Turkey, Australia, Denmark and Canada.

  16. Randall
    Mar 23rd, 2010 at 7:50 am

    Well, money wise, a Vtol’s flexibility could reduce the need for more aircraft and support for those aircraft. They can operate closer to the front lines without an airbase and 10,000 foot runway, which has to be built, guarded and cleaned.

    If we have to apply force, it should be quick and overwhelming.

  17. JasonWC1.....
    Jun 10th, 2010 at 2:49 pm

    These new fighters could come in handy for future wars with maybe Russia, China, or France


Keep track of the comments with Comment RSS

Don't Miss: New Stuff | Bestsellers | The Cute Store
                   Funny T-Shirts

Need a gift? Get unforgettable gifts for:
Geeks | Pranksters | Kids | Hipsters | Shutterbugs

Lijit Search

Old school? Bookmark us! RSS Feed Twitter Facebook Page