A Corporation Has Announced It Will Run For Congress

By Minnesotastan in Politics on Feb 3, 2010 at 10:18 pm

YouTube link.

Murray Hill Incorporated has just announced its intention to run for Congress in Maryland’s 8th Congressional District.

Murray Hill Inc. is believed to be the first “corporate person” to exercise its constitutional right to run for office. As Supreme Court observer Lyle Denniston wrote in his SCOTUSblog, “If anything, the decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission conferred new dignity on corporate “persons,” treating them — under the First Amendment free-speech clause — as the equal of human beings.”

Murray Hill Inc. plans on spending “top dollar” to protect its investment. “It’s our democracy,” Murray Hill Inc. says, “We bought it, we paid for it, and we’re going to keep it.”

The campaign’s designated human, Eric Hensal, will help the corporation conform to antiquated “human only” procedures and sign the necessary voter registration and candidacy paperwork.

To emphasize its point, this liberal public relations firm will file to run in the Republican primary.

Link, via Reddit.  The company’s press release.


Email This Post
Tweet This Post 
Share This Post on Facebook

Tags: ,


Neat stuff from the NeatoShop:


  1. Mon
    Feb 3rd, 2010 at 10:53 pm

    Pfffffth… what a crock…

    Here’s the truth about the Citizen United case…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUdFaIYzNwU

  2. ceebee
    Feb 3rd, 2010 at 10:53 pm

    That sounds ridiculous. I think big corporations control too much of the “government” as it is.

  3. chudez
    Feb 3rd, 2010 at 11:02 pm

    for a moment there i thought this was an article from The Onion.

  4. Christophe
    Feb 3rd, 2010 at 11:15 pm

    That’ll lightened up some political debates :)

  5. Felipe Venancio
    Feb 4th, 2010 at 6:16 am

    ceebee is so right! the corporations already own the government trough money.

  6. Roxanne
    Feb 4th, 2010 at 7:17 am

    It may win.

  7. Necronomic Recovery
    Feb 4th, 2010 at 9:07 am

    SO hang on, a corporation can be given human rights but something like dolphins can’t?

  8. tr
    Feb 4th, 2010 at 10:13 am

    See, I measure political and social happenings on whether or not, and to what extent they move us closer to living in a third-rate cyberpunk story. Corporations running for office is a nice step towards Universal Mirrorshades, but when corporations start directly exercising their _second_ amendment rights and build private armies for their own use, only then will we have truly arrived.

  9. Bryan C
    Feb 4th, 2010 at 10:43 am

    Yeah, we certainly wouldn’t want groups of people voluntarily pooling their resources for a common cause to be able to influence politics. That sort of free speech is clearly out of bounds. Besides, groups like that, maybe we could call them “unions”, could fund friendly politicians and cut all sorts of sweetheart deals. Disaster!

  10. MadMolecule
    Feb 4th, 2010 at 10:57 am

    ATTENTION EVERYONE: SATIRE ALERT.

  11. Stilledlife
    Feb 4th, 2010 at 11:35 am

    Looks like they are challenging the Supreme Court and years of corrupt interpretations of the 14th Amendment.
    Murray Hill isn’t preforming satire, it is pointing out an obvious parody and trying to stop it from becoming a reality. For the people by the people.

  12. frycookfromvenus
    Feb 4th, 2010 at 12:59 pm

    This is satire, but it’s also eerily true. It’s true that corporations were the de facto leaders of this country but the SCOTUS ruling just made them the de jure leaders & it’s not going to stop any corporation from piling on mountains of dough to any shill who will do their bidding. Meanwhile, us regular citizens who can’t afford to “donate” several million dollars to a good politician’s campaign will have no voice whatsoever.

    Say goodbye to politicians who speak on our behalf (Kucinich, Grayson, Sanders) & hello to the representative from Exxon-Mobil or the senator from Halliburton.

  13. Skeptic
    Feb 4th, 2010 at 1:17 pm

    But corporations still may not make direct contributions to federal campaigns from their own treasury, so unless the costs of creating the press release and video were all borne by a separate political-action-committee, they may already be in violation of campaign-finance-law.

  14. VM
    Feb 4th, 2010 at 1:43 pm

    If people hadn’t tried to push the envelope of McCain-Feingold past the point of all sense, prompting the Supreme Court to strike down it and its precursor rather than accept unconstitutional implications, then we wouldn’t be in this position. So what do the liberals do when their reductio ad absurdum arguments backfire? Protest with more reductio ad absurdum. Never learn….

  15. cola
    Feb 4th, 2010 at 5:41 pm

    SHHH, don’t give the corporations any ideas!

    Also, LOL at the people who didn’t actually READ any further than the title.

  16. Some Canadian Skeptic
    Feb 4th, 2010 at 9:51 pm

    Guys, this company is doing this to prove a point. They’re not interested in running government.

  17. keating
    Feb 4th, 2010 at 9:52 pm

    LOL.

    Oh wait. what? you don’t say? Corporations are ‘persons’ but not ‘citizens’?

    huh.

    so everyone who is joking about ‘corporations marrying’ is simply lacking a particular set of chromosomes?

    hmmm

    carry on, then

  18. jm1656
    Feb 5th, 2010 at 12:35 pm

    its the end of the democrap party as we know it, thank god.


Keep track of the comments with Comment RSS

Don't Miss: New Stuff | Bestsellers | The Cute Store
                   Funny T-Shirts

Need a gift? Get unforgettable gifts for:
Geeks | Pranksters | Kids | Hipsters | Shutterbugs

Lijit Search

Old school? Bookmark us! RSS Feed Twitter Facebook Page