Map of the Most Remote Places on Earth

By John Farrier in Travel on Dec 29, 2009 at 4:43 pm

This map by the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre in Ispra, Italy is an attempt to demonstrate what areas of the world are comparatively accessible by land and water travel. The cartographers concluded that much of the world commonly thought of as inaccessible is not:

The maps are based on a model which calculated how long it would take to travel to the nearest city of 50,000 or more people by land or water. The model combines information on terrain and access to road, rail and river networks (see the maps). It also considers how factors such as altitude, steepness of terrain and hold-ups like border crossings slow travel.

Plotted onto a map, the results throw up surprises. First, less than 10 per cent of the world’s land is more than 48 hours of ground-based travel from the nearest city. What’s more, many areas considered remote and inaccessible are not as far from civilisation as you might think. In the Amazon, for example, extensive river networks and an increasing number of roads mean that only 20 per cent of the land is more than two days from a city – around the same proportion as Canada’s Quebec province.

Map Link and Article Link via Volokh Conspiracy


Email This Post
Tweet This Post 
Share This Post on Facebook

Tags: ,


Neat stuff from the NeatoShop:


  1. Evo Morales
    Dec 29th, 2009 at 5:59 pm

    Stop believing the center of the world. Europe sucks

    Dejen de creerse el centro del mundo¡¡. Europa es una mierda.

  2. Edward
    Dec 29th, 2009 at 6:24 pm

    And there isn’t a square inch that cannot be reached by our military in less than 12 hours,

  3. marcusbacus
    Dec 29th, 2009 at 8:07 pm

    The article link seems wrong.

  4. ibulump
    Dec 29th, 2009 at 8:38 pm

    Pretty much what you’d expect, innit? The Sahara, Greenland and neighboring Canadian arctic, Siberia, upper Amazon basin, and Australian outback are very remote. Go figure.

  5. Mwoop
    Dec 31st, 2009 at 12:17 am

    Here is an interesting response to this article that I think brings up some compelling points about our concepts of remoteness by adding socio-economic factors into the mix.

    http://timetoeatthedogs.com/2009/10/28/the-remotest-place-on-earth/

    It is worth a quick read if you are interested.

  6. ted
    Dec 31st, 2009 at 11:06 am

    OUR military, Edward?


Keep track of the comments with Comment RSS

Don't Miss: New Stuff | Bestsellers | The Cute Store
                   Funny T-Shirts

Need a gift? Get unforgettable gifts for:
Geeks | Pranksters | Kids | Hipsters | Shutterbugs

Lijit Search

Old school? Bookmark us! RSS Feed Twitter Facebook Page