Engineering Students Develop Fart Detector

By John Farrier in Science & Tech on Sep 1, 2009 at 7:58 pm

Behold the blessings of technology:

After learning in class how breathalyzers work, Robert Clain and Miguel Salas assembled a fart detector from a sensitive hydrogen sulfide monitor, a thermometer and a microphone and wrote the software that would rate the emission. A “slight perturbance in the air” near the detector sets it to work measuring the three pillars of fart quality: stench, temperature and sound. Temperature, Clain explains, is critical. The hotter a fart, the faster it spreads. “It beeps faster if it’s a high ranker, and a voice rates it on a scale of zero to nine,” he says. “If it ranks a nine, a fan comes on to blow it away. It even records the noise so you can play it back later.” After a few months of construction, they began field tests. “Well, the sample data wasn’t the entire school, but we definitely tested it,” Salas says.

The developers suggest that their invention could be used to evaluate the health of livestock, detect hydrogen-sulfide-producing bacteria in hospitals, or test for bad breath.

Link via GearFuse

Photo credit: Robert Clain and Miguel Salas


Email This Post
Tweet This Post 
Share This Post on Facebook


Neat stuff from the NeatoShop:


  1. Johnny Cat
    Sep 1st, 2009 at 9:14 pm

    Ah, I love it when Science and Farts meet. Certainly, somewhere, Albert Einstein is LOLing.

  2. BobCow
    Sep 1st, 2009 at 9:24 pm

    I don’t really think most of us need a detector to know a fart has taken place.

  3. Gauldar
    Sep 1st, 2009 at 9:28 pm

    At least it’s not completly useless, it has a fan built in. Now all it needs is a digital clock.

  4. Jet Clarke
    Sep 1st, 2009 at 9:58 pm

    Mythbusters did it first, guys! And they didn’t need a fancy-schmancy hydro-sulfide detector either.

  5. Gauldar
    Sep 1st, 2009 at 10:00 pm

    @Jet

    That was only recording a fart on high speed. This is more about collecting information on the potency.

  6. Kalel
    Sep 1st, 2009 at 10:30 pm

    Did they earn a ‘passing’ grade?

  7. Gauldar
    Sep 1st, 2009 at 10:39 pm

    @Kalel

    No, but they did ‘ignite’ people’s interest in the topic.

  8. ted
    Sep 2nd, 2009 at 6:56 am

    I always like to get wind of recent advances in science.

  9. SimonSays
    Sep 2nd, 2009 at 7:55 am

    Unless the device can point out the guilty party, I don’t see much of use to it.

  10. Moon
    Sep 2nd, 2009 at 8:57 am

    SimonSays, Everyone knows “He who smelt it, dealt it”

  11. RonMoses
    Sep 2nd, 2009 at 10:17 am

    Still no cure for cancer.

  12. FishBottleT
    Sep 2nd, 2009 at 11:56 am

    Well this means no more blaming it on others!!! DANG

  13. ByrdBrain
    Sep 2nd, 2009 at 1:43 pm

    No, no cure for cancer. But we are one fart-detector closer to that cure.


Keep track of the comments with Comment RSS

Don't Miss: New Stuff | Bestsellers | The Cute Store
                   Funny T-Shirts | Zombie Shop

Need a gift? Get unforgettable gifts for:
Geeks | Pranksters | Kids | Hipsters | Shutterbugs

Lijit Search

Old school? Bookmark us! RSS Feed Twitter Facebook Page