Are Jocks Jerks?

By Alex in Baby & Kids, Sports on Aug 31, 2009 at 3:50 am

Kate Dailey of Newsweek’s The Human Condition blog wrote a very interesting post about the role of sports in child development. Is sports beneficial for kids or does it turn jocks into jerks?

The answer – painfully obvious to those who still remember their high school days – came by way of a new psychology study by Richard Lerner et al:

Depending on one’s high-school experience, there are two distinct philosophies about the role sports plays in a child’s development. There’s the idea that youth sports teaches kids discipline and respect, keeps them off the street, and helps them mature into adults: it’s sports that turned athletically gifted but insecure Daniel Larusso into The Karate Kid.

But just as pervasive is the opinion that jocks are jerks, and kids who play sports are mean bullies who will do anything to win, who need to dominate their opponents and who carry that aggressiveness streak off the field. Kids who play sports, this line of thinking goes, are more like Johnny Lawrence, star athlete (and big-time bully) from the Cobra-Kai dojo.

A recent study in the journal Developmental Psychology suggest that jocks really are jerks—if they focus exclusively on sports at the expense of other more-well rounded programs. But kids who both play sports and are exposed to youth-development program like scouting or 4-H show the most markers of personal growth and maturity.

Link


Email This Post
Tweet This Post 
Share This Post on Facebook


Neat stuff from the NeatoShop:


  1. seefish3
    Aug 31st, 2009 at 4:08 am

    As much as I hate jocks, this is just another skewed study that becomes an ad for the org that proposed it.

  2. Skipweasel
    Aug 31st, 2009 at 5:12 am

    Of course, kids can be nasty little thugs without the aid of sport – some have an innate talent for being viscious little buggers.

  3. Justin
    Aug 31st, 2009 at 10:35 am

    I think physical sports like football simply attract the highly aggressive/jerk type of person rather than it making them into bullies.

    Just thinking back to my own high school experience, sure there were some bullies who played sports. However, I think they were in the extreme minority of sport players. (including the really physical ones)

    I also take issue when people automatically assume that jocks are just big, dumb, bullies by default and you must prove otherwise. Some of the smartest people in my class were on the football, basketball, or baseball team.

  4. Gauldar
    Aug 31st, 2009 at 10:44 am

    Yeah, personality types are drawn to the activity that suits them, not the other way around. I wonder how many of these funded researches are staged just to provide the answer the sponsor wants.

  5. Dandy
    Aug 31st, 2009 at 10:56 am

    More psycho-babble BS…

    The study didn’t bother to find that the top successfull jocks are the nicest guys/gals you’d ever want to meet.

    Only the wanna-bes and losers are jerks.

  6. Gauldar
    Aug 31st, 2009 at 11:06 am

    @Dandy

    I highly disagree with you. It’s a generalization to state that all successful jocks are social people, it all depends on the individual. Also, some people have gotten so good at “faking it” for PR reasons. Don’t get me wrong, there may actually be a good amount of great people out there, but “all”? I don’t think so.

  7. Candace Scott
    Aug 31st, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    I found it interesting that they didn’t compare the them to people who didn’t play sports at all, but participated in the things like 4-H and the Scouts. They compared people who played sports only, and those who included other things like 4-H, what about the people who went to things like 4-H exclusively and didn’t participate in sports at all?

  8. Ahundred
    Aug 31st, 2009 at 4:38 pm

    I played four years of Pop Warner football and I consider myself very kind, it didn’t make me mean anymore than it kept me from going gay.

  9. ted
    Aug 31st, 2009 at 8:47 pm

    Team sports deliberately fosters a team mentality and a competitive mentality. This can lead to groups of bullies in ways that the chess club never could.

  10. PatrickM
    Aug 31st, 2009 at 11:32 pm

    I can’t say I agree with this study at all. For all intents and purposes, I was a “jock”. I was obsessed with my sport during high school and went on to win the state championship before graduating. I’m also a huge geek. I don’t think that makes me some sort of anomaly. I think the whole “jock/prep” vs “dorks/dweebs” deal is mostly a fabrication. Just as false as the idea of the American college experience (Animal House, Revenge of the Nerds, etc) It’s simply an attempt to “explain” a mostly inapplicable idea of adolescent social Darwinism where those with athletic ability are somehow inherently against anything different.

  11. JustinButNotTHATJustin
    Sep 2nd, 2009 at 7:34 am

    I think anyone who is focused on one subject can become a jerk. I’m sure there are plenty of violin jerks around. Being well-rounded as a child is essential for non-jerkiness.

  12. Earl
    Sep 17th, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    This comment is directed to PatrickM: So, I guess all those who say they were bullied by “jocks” in high school are all lying?

  13. Earl
    Sep 17th, 2009 at 2:14 pm

    A further comment to PatrickM: When you call the victims of bullying liars, you are rubbing salt into their wounds. Don’t deny the reality of other people’s experiences.


Keep track of the comments with Comment RSS

Don't Miss: New Stuff | Bestsellers | The Cute Store
                   Funny T-Shirts

Need a gift? Get unforgettable gifts for:
Geeks | Pranksters | Kids | Hipsters | Shutterbugs

Lijit Search

Old school? Bookmark us! RSS Feed Twitter Facebook Page