8 Starship Enterprise Facts Every Trekker Should Know

Posted by Alex in Movies & SciFi, Neatorama Only on June 15, 2009 at 12:50 am



USS Enterprise (NCC-1701), the starship in the original Star Trek TV series

To boldly go where no man has gone before, you'd need a really good starship - and to launch Star Trek, the pop culture phenomenon that entertained and inspired millions, you'd need a pretty darned good one! And that is exactly what the United Space Starship Enterprise delivered. Here are 8 Starship Enterprise facts every Trekker should know:

1. Meet the REAL Enterprise (Several of Them, Actually)


(L) The tenth HMS Enterprise, an Arctic survey sloop (1848), painting by WH Browne from the National Maritime Museum online collection;
(R) USS Enterprise at Valcour Island, Lake Champlain, New York (1776) from Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships

Before Star Trek, there have been many actual ships named Enterprise. The very first one of note was a French frigate L'Enterprise, which was captured by the British Royal Navy in 1705 and renamed as HMS Enterprise. It served as a British gun ship until it was wrecked just two years later. After this ship, there were 14 other HMS also named Enterprise (sometimes spelled Enterprize).

The United States have 8 battleships named Enterprise, including the first nuclear powered aircraft carrier in the world. The very first one (before the US became a country, so technically it was a ship of the Continental Navy) was an armed sloop on Lake Champlain in 1775 named the United States Ship (USS) Enterprise.

During the American Civil War, aeronaut and scientist Thaddeus S.C. Lowe built a balloon named Enterprise, to be used by the Union Army to perform aerial recon on Confederate troops.

(L) Enterprise, a gas inflated aerostat (1858); (M) Space Shuttle Enterprise; (R) Artist rendering of VSS Enterprise

And who can forget the Space Shuttle Enterprise? It was the very first Space Shuttle orbiter, built for NASA in 1976. The Shuttle was supposed to be named Constitution, but a write-in campaign successfully persuaded NASA to name it after the Star Trek starship. (Interestingly, the fictional Starship Enterprise was a Constitution-class vessel - coincidence? Hm....)

The last actual Enterprise hasn't been built yet but it already has a name: Virgin Space Ship (VSS) Enterprise and yes, it's an homage to Star Trek. It's a suborbital spaceplane being built by Sir Richard Branson of Virgin for the purposes of space tourism.

Ironically, when Sir Richard offered the first flight to William Shatner, the actor declined and revealed that he's actually afraid of space travel, "I'm interested in man's march into the unknown but to vomit in space is not my idea of a good time. Neither is a fiery crash with the vomit hovering over me." Shatner added that he's not entirely against the idea - he just needed some reassurance. "I do want to go up but I need guarantees I'll definitely come back." (Source)

2. No Rockets, Jets or Firestreams

Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry, who pitched the TV show as "Wagon Train to the Stars," didn't tell art director Matt Jefferies what Starship Enterprise should look like, instead he told the bewildered art director what he did not want to see. Starship Concept Art has reprint of a nifty article in Star Trek: The Magazine by Jefferies about the design process:

"In my approach to Star Trek I wanted to be as practical as possible," Jefferies says. "I could tell Gene was serious enough, but I really didn't know where to start. I knew the Enterprise was going to be on the cutting edge of the future, but essentially he gave me the job of finding a shape, and I didn't know what the shape looked like." Although Roddenberry knew a lot about his ship, he had never visualized it, and consequently made the situation more complicated since he couldn't give Jefferies a detailed sense of direction. According to Jefferies, Roddenberry was absolutely clear to avoid any resemblance to a 1960's rocket ship. "Gene described the 100-150 man crew, outer space, fantastic, unheard-of speed, and that we didn't have to worry about gravity. He had emphasized that there were to be no fins, no wings, no smoke trails, no flames, no rocket.

After hundreds of drawings, Jefferies came up with this:


Image via Starship Concept Art

In his honor, the crawl spaces on all of the Starfleet starships on Star Trek are called Jefferies tubes.

3. The Original Name of USS Enterprise

That's right - the iconic starship wasn't always named USS Enterprise ... in the original draft, Roddenberry named it USS Yorktown after a World War II aircraft carrier. The starship was commanded by Captain Robert April, then Christopher Pike, before Roddenberry settled on James Tiberius Kirk.

By the way, William Shatner was the third choice for Kirk. The role was offered to Lloyd Bridges and Jack Lord, both of whom declined it.

4. The Origin of NCC-1701

How did the famous USS Enterprise get its registration number NCC-1701 is the stuff of legend. There are conflicting stories, including one where 1701 is a tribute to Roddenberry's childhood neighbor's house number or that Jefferies got it from the registration number of his airplane.

Here's Matt Jefferies' explanation when he was asked during a BBC Interview:

NC, by international agreement, stood for all United States commercial vehicles. Russia had wound up with four Cs, CC CC. It’d been pretty much a common opinion that any major effort in space would be two expensive for any one country, so I mixed the US and the Russian and came up with NCC.

The one seven zero part - I needed a number that would be instantly identifiable, and three, six, eight and nine are too easily confused. I don’t think anyone’ll confuse a one and a seven, or the zero. So the one seven stood for the seventeenth basic ship design in the Federation, and the zero one would have been serial number one, the first bird.


5. Land the Ship? Too Expensive, Let's Teleport Everybody Instead!


Photo: Rex Features

Originally, Roddenberry envisioned the USS Enterprise to land on various planets, but it turned out to be too expensive as it would require them to build expensive sets. The next idea was to use shuttles - but when filming began, the full-sized shooting model wasn't ready. So, they came up with the idea of "beaming down" the crew via a teleportation device and thus the transporter was born! (Source)

In 1994, TIME Magazine interviewed Star Trek technical expert Michael Okuda about the intricacies of the transporter:

"It should be possible if we decompile the pattern buffer."

Transporters can send people instantly from one location to another by converting their molecules into energy, then reassembling them. Every living being has a distinct pattern of molecules; the pattern buffer fixes the configuration by adjusting for the Doppler effect -- the apparent change in the frequency of the energy waves caused by motion.

"I'll verify the Heisenberg compensators."

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle states that you cannot know a subatomic particle's exact position and its exact direction and velocity at the same time. To transport people you have to know all those things, so the Heisenberg compensator was devised to overcome that problem. It's an attempt by the Trek writers to signal that they are at least aware of the issue. And how does the Heisenberg compensator work? "It works very well, thank you," says Okuda.

6. The Next Gen Enterprise: Hilton in Space

Jefferies designed the bridge in the original USS Enterprise in the style of a Navy battleship, with specialized workstations for its crew. When set designer Richard James updated the bridge for Star Trek: The Next Generation (restriction: no purple!), Jefferies was asked about the new look. To which he replied:

Gene asked me how I liked the show, and I said that he had taken the bridge of my ship and turned it into the lobby of the Hilton. And I have just never watched any of them since. I’m lost.

Ironically, Star Trek and Hilton actually did come together to create a theme attraction. Star Trek: The Experience opened in 1998 at the Las Vegas Hilton. It closed in 2008 due to low attendance (though it is due to re-open in a different location in 2010).

7. The Original Star Trek Enterprise Prop


Photo: Carolyn Russo / Smithsonian

If you visit the National Air and Space Museum at the Smithsonian, definitely check out the actual model of the Starship Enterprise used in the filming of the original Star Trek TV show.


The hull and one nacelle of the original Star Trek Starship Enterprise model as it was received by the National Air and Space Museum from Paramount Studios on March 1, 1974. Image WEB11192-2009. Photo: Smithsonian (with permission)

The model of the Enterprise was sent to the museum in crates, donated by Paramount Studios five years after the series ended.


Enterprise during its first Smithsonian restoration. SI Neg #74-3977. Photo: Smithsonian (with permission)

The Smithsonian performed extensive restoration to put the starship model back together, and for the first time ever, the photos of the restoration process are available to the public at the museum's blog.

The Museum Registrar Gregory K.H. Bryant has more on this behind the scenes look at the icon science fiction model: Link - Thanks Llori!

8. The Hot-Rod Starship Enterprise

For his movie Star Trek, director J.J. Abrams decided that the USS Enterprise could use a face-lift and worked with artists at Industrial Light & Magic to update the starship - like Roddenberry, he gave a simple directive:

"He wanted a hot-rod type of vehicle, but they also wanted to preserve the Enterprise kind of look," model maker John Goodson said in a presentation at ILM's San Francisco headquarters earlier this month.

"J.J. Abrams kept saying, 'Make it a bigger movie. Make it a bigger shot,'" creative director David Nakabayashi added. "I think that's one thing you see in this film, at least: The stuff I've seen is just everything is big."

SCI FI Wire has the interview with model maker John Goodson and visual effects supervisor Roger Guyett about the new Enterprise: Link

The official website for JJ Abram's Star Trek movie has a nifty 360° panorama of the bridge of the new starship:


Previous post
this post? Please Email this               
Next post

Tags: , , , ,


FUN PRODUCTS FROM THE NEATORAMA SHOP:


COMMENT

20 comments to "8 Starship Enterprise Facts Every Trekker Should Know"

  1. Johnny Cat
    June 15th, 2009 at 10:22 am

    http://www.airspacemag.com/photos?c=y&articleID=28246359&page=49

  2. Church
    June 15th, 2009 at 10:54 am

    Note that the Enterprise model is now on the lower (basement) level of the A&S gift shop. I know a bunch of people who've been there and missed it.

  3. anonymous89
    June 15th, 2009 at 10:11 pm

    Nice list. Note that "trekkers" are people who take long walks or who globetrot in their spare time. Trekkies hate being called trekkers.

  4. Johnny MAck
    June 15th, 2009 at 10:33 pm

    OMGosh dude I just LOVE Star Trek!

    RT

  5. covax
    June 16th, 2009 at 3:09 am

    Awesome!

  6. charlie reich
    June 16th, 2009 at 9:41 am

    thanks for the trip down memory lane

  7. TimWarp
    June 16th, 2009 at 9:47 am

    anonymous89

    And Trekkers hate to be called Trekkies!

  8. iheartstartrek
    June 16th, 2009 at 11:52 am

    You forgot that the enterprise only has one bathroom.

  9. Kate
    June 17th, 2009 at 2:35 pm

    Well, as I always understood it, a Trekker was someone who was a fan of the newer series (DS9, VOY, ENT...obviously there aren't any from ENT *snicker snicker*). A Trekkie was a fan starting with TOS or TNG. Most Trekkers become Trekkies though.

  10. FiveStarTrekker
    June 17th, 2009 at 5:17 pm

    A "Trekkie" is someone who likes Star Trek. A "Trekker" is someone who loves Star Trek and goes along for the ride. I consider myself a Trekker, not a Trekkie.

  11. frank b
    June 21st, 2009 at 12:21 pm

    well, i'm old enough to remember the truth.

    trekkie is what a trek fan USED to be called.

    trekker is what they called us when making fun of nerds started to lose its cool.

    now that nerds rule the world, does it even matter?

  12. Dawes
    June 21st, 2009 at 9:33 pm

    The Enterprise was not a shuttle orbiter, it was an engineering mockup made from low cost materials to make sure the parts fit - read lots of plywood and styrofoam. And I can see it from the parking lot at work.

  13. cathy g
    June 22nd, 2009 at 12:14 am

    "trekkie" is what people who are not familiar and love the franchise call the fans. Fans who admire Star Trek prefer to be called "Trekkers." Trekkie is rather a pejorative put-down nickname.

  14. Cashew
    July 1st, 2009 at 3:46 am

    @ilikestartrek

    The Enterprise D had only one bathroom, the Enterprise and the Enterprise A had bathrooms in every stateroom.

    Gah, I'm a nerd.

  15. Johnny73
    July 25th, 2009 at 7:18 am

    While it is true that the Space Shuttle Enterprise never went into space, it was NOT made out of plywood and styrofoam. It was an actual orbiter just without engines or heat shield. It was used in glide tests (5 unmanned and 3 manned) and was mated to an external fuel tank and boosters in launch configuration for vibration tests. Just want to clear that up.

  16. Hec Currie
    August 2nd, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    Dear People,

    I am a professor at the University of Cincinnati, you can tell by my email address -- it’s real and verifiable, and I’m writing you to ask that you take a look at a article I wrote which is recently published in Integral Review Journal online.
    I am sending it to you for one reason, aside from the basic question “what do you think of it?” I’m sending it to you because of the impact you have on the minds of young people throughout this world. This article I wrote, although it may not seem so at first reading, is about the common bond in thought and wonder shared by all human beings. What this has to do with you is simply put: If we humans are as Neil Armstrong put it in July of 1999, “…humanity is not forever chained to this planet….” how can we hope to interact with any being we may one day perhaps encounter, if we cannot accept the wonderful and beautiful diversity of humanity; and the good in all the wisdom of every culture?
    I believe that finding common ground starts here, at home with each of us individually. My hope is to transcend dogmatic division, but as a World War II veteran I’m afraid this nutsy professor may lack the spark that inspires interest. My method is an attempt to examine how the ancient minds merged The Arts with their Science, as well as the universality of (philosophical) thought in every culture. My hope is for human beings to one day collectively transcend divisive dogma.
    Maybe one day, before I leave this life I would be able to put a panal together and participate in a documentary about humanity’s shared insights rooted in freedom and agape, philosophies through which we can embrace each other as human beings. Because only then can we move on to explore beyond “our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet.” JFK 6/63.

  17. thefluteplayer
    August 15th, 2009 at 9:31 am

    In the words of Gene Roddenberry (and I quote) "It's TREKKIE. I should know.... I created it."

  18. sq
    August 15th, 2009 at 1:46 pm

    The Enterprise that was made of plywood was a scaled down mock up used for a river race (-- regatta?) in Tampa,Fl. This was in the early 1980's. It was built by a group of young men, some employed in the electronics industries, one that I know of employed by a company that made flight simulators - They raced it more than one year and might even have won.

  19. atheistlibertariancriminalasshole
    August 15th, 2009 at 2:02 pm

    @dawes #12: a good part of my childhood was financed by my mother's participation in the construction of the space shuttle 'enterprise' and mom wasn't a carpenter! mock-ups do not need flight recorders, ring-laser gyros, hybrid accelerometers or any of the various and assorted other cutting edge [for the time] tech that she took part in building for the 'enterprise'. while, as johnny73 points out, she never went to space, the bird did fly. she was piggy-backed to cruising altitude atop a boeing 747 before being dropped and left to fly to and land at edwards, repeatedly. styro and plywood? please do a little research before insulting the thousands of people who contributed to the creation of the prototype or the men who flew her.

  20. john alex
    October 7th, 2009 at 12:53 pm

    I would like to say that we(me and my kids) would enjoy a new version of star trek so come on get that imagination going thank you


PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT

Neatorama Comment Policy
You don't have to register or login to comment, but it's easier if you do so. Comments aren't censored, but those that are abusive or off-topic may be edited or deleted.


Stay updated on the comments with Comment RSS