World War II POWs Used Escape Maps Hidden In Monopoly Pieces

Posted by Queuebot in Odd News, Weapons & War on March 18, 2009 at 10:35 am


Last year, an archive of World War II maps was donated to the British Library Map Library. Some of these maps are now on display to the public, and they have fascinating story behind them!

Waddington PLC, the printing company best known for its games including Monopoly, was involved in a most unusual venture during the Second World War: printing maps on silk, rayon and tissue paper for military use and smuggling some of them to prisoners of war.

[...]

During WWII hundreds of thousands of maps were produced by the British on thin cloth and tissue paper. The idea was that a serviceman captured or shot down behind enemy lines should have a map to help him find his way to safety if he escaped or, better still, evade capture in the first place. A map like this could be concealed in a small place (a cigarette packet or the hollow heel of a flying boot), did not rustle suspiciously if the captive was searched and, in the case of maps on cloth or mulberry leaf paper, could survive wear and tear and even immersion in water. The scheme was soon extended to cover those who had already been captured, although a certain amount of ingenuity was required to get the maps into the POW camps.

Link – via holeinthedonut

From the Upcoming ueue, submitted by baweibel.


Previous post
this post? Please Email this               
Next post

Tags: , , , , , , ,


FUN PRODUCTS FROM THE NEATORAMA SHOP:


COMMENT

4 comments to "World War II POWs Used Escape Maps Hidden In Monopoly Pieces"

  1. Evilbeagle
    March 18th, 2009 at 10:52 am

    I saw a TV show about this and then followed up with some reading, and it still continues to fascinate me.

  2. givethosepeopleair
    March 18th, 2009 at 11:37 am

    this could be a great movie.

  3. Chad Cloman
    March 18th, 2009 at 6:45 pm

    About the title of this article, I think it's more accurate to say the maps were hidden in Monopoly "boards" and not in the pieces.

  4. :/
    March 19th, 2009 at 3:05 am

    I don't know about this. I've seen this in an old edition of Reader's Digest (When I say old I mean, months old.)


PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT

Neatorama Comment Policy
You don't have to register or login to comment, but it's easier if you do so. Comments aren't censored, but those that are abusive or off-topic may be edited or deleted.


Stay updated on the comments with Comment RSS