Brutalist Architecture

1. DaveL
   January 12th, 2009 at 2:36 am

   Funny... the same description can be used for Ann Coulter.

2. PK
   January 12th, 2009 at 3:50 am

   It looks good when it's done right. But yeah, those buildings scare me when I was very young.

3. peril
   January 12th, 2009 at 4:42 am

   Le Corbusier was Swiss French. Even though he changed nationality later on in life, I think the Swiss stake claim to his nationality, he is on the Swiss 10 Franc note.

4. Polx
   January 12th, 2009 at 7:24 am

   Brutalist Architecture is much like Techno music.

   Some can work within the field and create genuinely beautiful innovative things using the strengths and limitations of the medium.

   But most everyone else is using the medium to disguise their mediocrity with ill used technology that abrades peoples soul.

5. Lew A
   January 12th, 2009 at 8:53 am

   There is actually a brutalist church building in D.C.

   They think it is so ugly, they want to change it, but some people applied for it to be a historical landmark, because it's architectural styles is so unique. So this group of people are pretty much stuck with this ugly building ... quite humorous.

   Lew

6. Paulina
   January 12th, 2009 at 9:52 am

   I admit that I've taken the picture of the building on the story cover, but only because it simply amazes me with its ugliness. The entire complex of the Barbican seems the very opposite of its original community-oriented philosophy.

7. Gauldar
   January 12th, 2009 at 9:55 am

   Brutalism [sic] completely rejected the classical norms of beautification and decoration for hard angles, rough surfaces, and exposed plumbing and machinery

   Sounds more like Britney Spears the Anne Coulter. If had caught a glimps of Ann Coulter's plumbing I think I might feel the need to rip my eyes and out fill the sockets with salt to clense myself from the evil.

8. joy
   January 12th, 2009 at 10:50 am

   Thanks for sharing this. I managed to get lost in the Barbican a few weeks ago, looking for what I *thought* was the real Thomas More house. Come to find out, it was just one of their building names. It's not the prettiest of building complexes, but I've always loved it anyway.

   I just ran through several dozen of the flickr images, and I agree - some can make it gorgeous, and some can be just horrifying. But, I'm wondering if the levels of graffiti on them has anything to do with it.

   Also, I'm wondering if Brutalist Architecture just looks better in black and white, or if that's just me.

9. Wok
   January 12th, 2009 at 1:17 pm

   My entire school is done in this style.

   I hate it so much.

10. dero
    January 12th, 2009 at 5:01 pm

    My home town of Melbourne, Australia, is home to lots of brutalist architecture (much now protected) but my favourite has to be my local swimming centre - the Harold Holt Memorial Pool. The amusing thing about that is that it's named after Harold Holt, a former Australian Prime Minister - who went missing, presumed drowned, when swimming...

    http://blog.adonline.id.au/brutalist-architecture/

11. Sofar
    January 12th, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    Modernism has completely sucked since Art Deco went out of style.

12. Joe
    January 12th, 2009 at 11:49 pm

    I'm a student at the Rochester Institute of Technology in New York.

    Our entire college is done in a brutalist style. Consequently, we've been named the 11th ugliest college in the nation by the princeton review for the last decade or so.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RIT

13. Leah
    January 13th, 2009 at 6:08 am

    I like it.

14. Namowal
    January 13th, 2009 at 3:15 pm

    I don't like the style at all.
    When a building looks like it it's either
    1.An orthopedic device
    2.Something from the machine room
    3.A parking garage (when it's not)
    Something is wrong.

PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT