NEATORAMA HOME | RSS | LITE/MOBILE VERSION | BEST OF NEATORAMA | NEATORAMA SPOTLIGHT New! |

Google Street View Catches House on Fire

By Miss Cellania in Pictures on Aug 10, 2008 at 12:36 am



No, the Google Street View cameras didn’t cause the fire (at least I don’t think so), but they were there in Sherwood, Arkansas when this house went up in flames. Now the images are saved for who know how long on Google. Link -via J-Walk Blog)


 
Email This Post 
Tweet This Post 
Share This Post on Facebook 
Buzz This up!


  1. JC
    Aug 10th, 2008 at 1:17 am

    Is it ethic to publish this, along with an address?

  2. Miss Cellania
    Aug 10th, 2008 at 1:48 am

    I'm sure no one lives there now. But you aren't the first to question Google Street View's ethics.

  3. PaulVI
    Aug 10th, 2008 at 12:43 pm

    "9. Turn Right onto ___ St."
    "10. You are at Burning House, Sherwood, AR."

  4. Aar000n
    Aug 10th, 2008 at 6:45 pm

    I thought this was pretty cool. Not just because you get to see a burning house, but because you could move around and get a time lapse of neighbors moving around. Even kids riding bikes, hopping curbs, and all sorts of things. You rarely get to see so many people in neighborhoods on google street view.

    -JC: How is it not ethical to publish it? I'm probably missing something but I can't think of anything.

  5. willf
    Aug 10th, 2008 at 8:24 pm

    That fire hydrant sure seems far away. I followed the hose down the street. Makes me wonder how close our house is to the nearest hydrant.

  6. Jim McDosh
    Aug 10th, 2008 at 8:58 pm

    Wow dude, Google Streetmaps is gcool.

    JT
    http://www.FireMe.To/udi

  7. Calvin Gilbert
    Aug 10th, 2008 at 9:01 pm

    Really cool. I never thought google would catch a house fire on their street view.

  8. Lasha
    Aug 10th, 2008 at 9:09 pm

    Interesting how things like this are going to be documented in the years to come.

  9. martin english
    Aug 10th, 2008 at 9:22 pm

    Just send the link to the insurance company ...

  10. ext237
    Aug 10th, 2008 at 9:28 pm

    Ha, check this out: click down about 2 blocks. Looks like the streetview car drove around a fire department pickup trick and ran over the fire hose. The volunteer fire department guy is flipping them off!

    http://tinyurl.com/555o3s

  11. Jason
    Aug 11th, 2008 at 12:16 am

    It is amazing what Google Street View picks up. Everyone should check their own street and make sure they were not caught doing anything embarrassing! Japan just got street view last week, and I'm nowhere to be found on my Tokyo street:

    http://jasoncollin.org/2008/08/06/walk-down-my-street-tokyo-japan-goog le-maps-street-view/

  12. Krazd
    Aug 11th, 2008 at 12:27 am

    I would think whoever was driving the car would report it to google and have a new picture by now. I wouldn't be surprised if they update the image within a month or two.

  13. erichansa
    Aug 11th, 2008 at 5:40 am

    is it real, i don't believe that.

  14. ted
    Aug 11th, 2008 at 6:08 am

    I thought the hydrant seemed really far away, too. The closest one to me is one house over.

  15. PJ
    Aug 11th, 2008 at 9:43 am

    Explain why you think it's unethical to publish pictures taken from public property. It's public information that there is a house there, and that it was on fire. How is this unethical?

  16. cooties
    Aug 11th, 2008 at 9:52 am

    That looks like a shot from SecondLife. From the smoke to the hydrant to the fact that the emergency servies would even *allow* the car in that vicinity, I think you'll find it's fake. Nice landscaping, too - a single, giant palm tree.

  17. Chris
    Aug 11th, 2008 at 9:58 am

    I am a firefighter in NJ, and i'm wondering why they aren't inside that house. That is a very easily fought fire, and they are standing outside using master streams. I can not see one hoseline into that house. I would not be surprised if that house burned to the ground.

  18. Phillip H
    Aug 11th, 2008 at 10:43 am

    "Is it [ethical] to publish this, along with an address?"

    Sure, why not? If you think burnt out houses are something special, visit Detroit, Michigan. We still have houses that were burnt out in the 70's riots and never rebuilt!

  19. Toshalot
    Aug 11th, 2008 at 1:09 pm

    Lawlz... Never never never ever question the ethics of google or you will wake up to men in black suits knocking on your front door at 3 in the morning. I think it is quite funny. I want my house to be on fire on google earth.

  20. Winphreak
    Aug 11th, 2008 at 4:11 pm

    @Cooties, I really hope you're kidding. Secondlife is sharp, but there's no way that's fake.

  21. TCooper
    Aug 11th, 2008 at 6:01 pm

    There is a frame missing right in front of the house. Maybe the Google Orbital Laser Platform (beta) misfired?

    Seriously, I hope no one was home or got hurt.

    Ethical? Not any different than the people standing around with their digital cameras posting photos on other websites or blogs.

  22. Manny Ramirez
    Aug 11th, 2008 at 7:55 pm

    Hope Google don't get sued for this!
    You know that Google has been sued for privacy invasion before, so hope the owners of this house don't want to blame the infrared beam from Google Earth camera!
    Everyone wants money from Google :D

  23. bbbob12345
    Aug 11th, 2008 at 8:42 pm

    That home was going to be foreclosed on. If I cant have the home nobody can muhahaha... striking match...

  24. Mikey
    Aug 12th, 2008 at 6:16 am

    So what? Wait until streetview of Calcutta is available, you will see people dying along the curbs...

  25. Weegee
    Aug 12th, 2008 at 10:28 pm

    It seems that the specific snapshot shown in this article has been removed. However, the rest are still there, just click the N or S arrows to see them.

  26. AdamFFM
    Aug 13th, 2008 at 1:48 am

    Chris.. are you fricken kidding me? its vented itself through almost the ENTIRETY of the roof... lightweight wood truss can and will fail after 5-10 mins of direct flame exposure.... and you can see flames though the house as well. feel free to go interior on that but im gonna hang back and go defensive. surround and drown, protect the neighbors houses... i love my wife and kids to much to go interior on a home that is a total loss and a deathtrap

  27. Shep
    Aug 13th, 2008 at 9:40 pm

    Go to the frames where the Google car drove up the street where the firetrucks are. What is that about, getting in the way? Like drove right up to the back of one...

  28. me
    Aug 14th, 2008 at 3:03 pm

    funny: just "drive down" the eagle point drive... the pickup-driver even stops to watch the burning house.

  29. Nicole
    Aug 16th, 2008 at 8:33 am

    http://www.ntnews.com.au/article/2008/08/13/5163_ntnews.html

    Another Google Street View Frame - Man caught by Google passed out on the side walk.

  30. Alexa
    Oct 8th, 2008 at 1:36 am

    Oh!! very bad luck for the family that this disaster was captured byu big G

  31. Dennis
    Feb 6th, 2009 at 4:08 pm

    As I always say to the unemployed, "Better you than me."

  32. Smumdax
    Feb 6th, 2009 at 9:05 pm

    Went to take a look at it, but most of the images in the vicinity are now "no longer available". I don't understand why Google would remove these, I don't see why this is unethical. The house is burning, should we all just close our eyes?

    It's been said before, Google Maps is just like someone passing by and taking a picture, like most people do...

    If Google Maps' shots of the burning house is unethical, then what do we make of a reporter covering the story, with the fire in the background?

  33. Isabelle
    Apr 5th, 2009 at 4:50 am

    You're all missing the point. A SOMEBODY'S HOUSE WAS DESTROYED. There lives were in that house, precious photos, jewelry, gifts and important documents and you think thats cool?! Thats sick if you think this is great.

    I hate google street view with a passion and someone should not be allowed to take photos of my house, which they have. I wish I had of been there to give those Mofos the finger.

  34. christy
    May 29th, 2009 at 9:03 pm

    The street where this happened is not registered on google maps anymore

  35. MasterDJ32
    Nov 30th, 2009 at 5:53 pm

    IT IS NOT ALLOWING ME TO SEE IT :(

  36. cuberham1
    Dec 12th, 2009 at 6:07 pm

    I thnk the people who lived in this house asked Google to remove this picture from Street View, because whe I drag the Street View guy onto the map, that part isn't outlined in blue anymore.

  37. KElevra
    Dec 15th, 2009 at 10:14 pm

    HAH! talk about fucking embarasing , hey kids look its the google maps car....do i smell smoke? hahahha (yes i know im a terribul person and i sleep fine at night,its just damned great timing though isnt it? WOOF up in flames as the google car takes a pretty picture atleast theyll remeber what the house looked like

  38. Jeffdude
    Dec 16th, 2009 at 1:34 am

    @Isabelle

    Gee whiz, get over yourself. In the US it's legal to take pictures of pretty much anything from public property. I see absolutely nothing illegal or unethical about images of this house remaining on Google.

    What is supposed to be private about a home burning?

  39. Cyclone
    Jan 12th, 2010 at 11:05 pm

    Just an update, folks. The burning house image is no longer on Google Maps, and the streetname has also been removed. It turns out the entire street where the fire truck was is taken out, and going down the intersecting main path leading to the main thoroughfare skips right over that intersection. Interestingly, you can still see the smoke in the images that are left; on the street to the north, you can see the smoke facing south, and same from the south street facing north. On the north street, the allowed travel route stops just shy of the view of the burning house.

    And no, Google has not updated a single image. They oughta go down there sometime now and update that...

  40. Ganon
    Jan 31st, 2010 at 5:05 am

    Well the section of the street with the house is gone, but you can see the smoke from either part of the street around the turn on each side.

  41. Vic
    Feb 5th, 2010 at 10:00 pm

    Is it unethical for the bystanders to watch the fire? Is it unethical for the firefighters to actually see the fire? Of course not. Then how can it be unethical for it to be shown on Street View? f you don't want to see it, DON'T LOOK.
    To Isabelle Apr 5th, 2009 at 4:50am who said "I wish I had of been there to give those Mofos the finger."
    The phrase should be "had been there" or "had have been there" not "had of."

  42. Duchess of New Town
    Feb 10th, 2010 at 11:00 am

    Perhaps Google removed these images to save themselves embarrasment, if the Google-mobile actually impeded the fire service in the course of their duties, that is pretty reprehensible. Similarly if they deliberately entered an area they shouldn't and jeapordised their own safety and that of others just to get some "cool shots".

You don't have to register or login (quick login | regular login) to comment, but it's easier if you do so. Comments aren't censored, but those that are abusive or off-topic may be edited or deleted, mmkay?


Keep track of the comments with Comment RSS



Lijit Search


Got a neat story? Share it with the world by writing your very own Neatorama blog post with the Upcoming Queue. Who knows, you might just win something ...

Here's how to get started:
FAQ | Tips