Celeb-Driven “Red” Charity Shopping Campaign Spent $100 Million to Bring $18 Million.

Posted by Alex in Money & Finance on March 8, 2007 at 11:02 pm


Bono and his celebrity friends’ Red campaign has raised $18 million worldwide - that’s nothing to sneeze at except that they had spent an estimated $100 million promoting it!

The disproportionate ratio between the marketing outlay and the money raised is drawing concern among nonprofit watchdogs, cause-marketing experts and even executives in the ad business. It threatens to spur a backlash, not just against the Red campaign — which ambitiously set out to change the cause-marketing model by allowing partners to profit from charity — but also for the brands involved.

The backlash has already started:

The campaign’s inherent appeal to conspicuous consumption has spurred a parody by a group of San Francisco designers and artists, who take issue with Bono’s rallying cry. "Shopping is not a solution. Buy less. Give more," is the message at buylesscrap.org, which encourages people to give directly to the Global Fund.

Link - via A Welsh View



Previous post
this post? Please email this            
Next post

FROM THE NEATORAMA ONLINE STORE » more



COMMENT

5 comments to "Celeb-Driven “Red” Charity Shopping Campaign Spent $100 Million to Bring $18 Million."

  1. Vexorg
    March 9th, 2007 at 1:24 am

    That seems to be how these things end up. I remember seeing at some point that someone figured out that the trendy white wristbands from that Make Poverty History campaign a couple of years back turned out to be made in a Chinese sweatshop…

  2. Britt
    March 9th, 2007 at 2:27 am

    I never understood why the GAP still needed to profit from (RED) shirts. ‘A portion will go to fighting AIDS in Africa’. Brilliant. It would be terrible to give all the money to AIDS in Africa … Or hell, why not AIDS at home?

  3. Vexorg
    March 9th, 2007 at 4:23 am

    Last I checked, the GAP wasn’t profiting from much in the first place. They’re not exactly in the best of financial condition right now…

  4. phoenix
    March 9th, 2007 at 3:35 pm

    That sucks. :( I really liked the (RED) campaign, and thought it was a cool way to market gadgets that people wanted anyway and support a charity at the same time.

    Maybe now’s not the right time to judge the idea, and let it roll for a while longer to see if the costs eventually recoup. It’s a shame though, I really dug the idea.

  5. aylee
    March 9th, 2007 at 7:18 pm

    I just saw an article on nydailynews.com reporting about the article at adage.com not being true: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/gossip/story/503470p-424633c.html.


PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT

Neatorama Comment Policy
You don't have to register or login to comment, but it's easier if you do so. Comments aren't censored, but those that are abusive or off-topic may be edited or deleted.


Stay updated on the comments with Comment RSS