9 Laws of Physics That Don't Apply in Hollywood

Alex

In general, Hollywood filmmakers follow the laws of physics because they have no other choice. It’s just when they cheat with special effects that we seem to forget how the world really works.

1. Those Exploding Cars


No car explosions, please - found at LookyLuc [Flickr]

When you’re watching an action flick, all it takes is a crash, or maybe a stream of leaky gasoline that acts like a fuse, and suddenly, bang! You see a terrific explosion that’s complete and violent. But gasoline doesn’t explode unless mixed with about 93% air. Gas-induced car explosions were discovered on film relatively recently (you don’t see them in the old black-and-white movies), and now audiences just take them for granted. In general, there’s no need to rush out of a crashed car, risking injury, because you fear an imminent explosion – it’s probably not gonna happen.

2. Sound that Moves at the Speed of Light

Hollywood always gets this one wrong. On film, thunder doesn’t follow lightning (as in real life, because sound is slower); they occur simultaneously. Similarly, a distant volcano erupts, and the blast is heard immediately rather than five seconds later for each mile. Explosions on the battlefield go boom right away, no matter how far away spectators are. Even a small thing, like the crack of a baseball player’s bat, is simultaneous with ball contact, unlike at a real game.

3. Everything is Illuminated: The Myth of Radioactivity

Film would have you believe that radioactivity is contagious and makes you glow in the dark. Where did this idea come from? The Simpsons? Perhaps, but the truth is that the most common forms of radioactivity will make you radioactive only if the radioactive particles stick on you. Radioactivity is not contagious. If a person is exposed to the radioactive neutrons from a nuclear reactor, then he can become slightly radioactive, but he certainly won’t glow. And because radioactive things emit light only when they run into phosphor – like the coating on the inner surface of a TV tube – you don’t really need to worry.

4. Shotgun Blasts and Kung Fu Kicks Make Targets Fly across the Room

With the string of new kung fu films out (they run the gamut from The Matrix to Charlie’s Angels), you just can’t escape the small matter of bad physics. Yeah, the action scenes look great and all, but in reality momentum is conserved, such that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. So, when you see a gal kick someone across the room, technically, the kicker (or holder of a gun) must fly across the room in the opposite direction – unless she has a back against the wall.

5. Legends of the Fall

We aren’t surprised when the cartoon character Wile. E. Coyote runs off a cliff and is suspended there momentarily before he falls. But in the movies, buses and cars shouldn’t be able to jump across gaps in bridges, even if they go heavy on the accelerator. The fact is, a vehicle will fall even if it’s moving at a high speed. During the 1989 San Francisco earthquake, a driver saw a gap in the bridge too late, and probably inspired by the movies, accelerated to try to make it across. Unfortunately, the laws of physics were not suspended, and he fell into the hole and crashed on the other side. Movies with special effects should come with a warning: “Laws of physics are violated in this movie. Don’t try these stunts at home.”

6. The Sounds of Science

All across the silver screen, you’ll catch people screaming as their car flies in slow motion across the gap in the bridge. The problem, though, is that their voices don’t change. In reality, if you slow down motion by a factor of two, the frequency of all sounds should drop by an octave. Women will sound like men, and men will sound like Henry Kissinger. Sound is an oscillation of the air. Middle C, for example, is 256 vibrations per second. If time is slowed down, there are fewer cycles per second, and the resulting sound is lower in pitch.

7. Shell Shock! Exploding Artillery Shells that Blow Straight Up

In movies, shells tend to kill only the person standing directly over them. It seems like a waste of artillery, since – if you believe the movies – each shell can’t kill more than a single rifle bullet can. But in real life, artillery shells blow out in all directions, killing people all over. Movie directors like to have their actors running through a field of such shells, but they don’t want their actors killed, so they arrange for underground explosions in holes that blow straight up, missing anyone who’s more than 5 feet away.

8. The Sparking Bullet

Sparking bullets are relatively recent invention in movie special effects. The gimmick provides a way of letting the audience know that the bullet just barely missed its target. In real life, sparks do occur when you scrape steel or other hard metals on hard surfaces (such as brick) because little pieces of brittle materials are heated to glow and fly off. The problem here is that bullets are generally made of lead because it’s dense and soft, and you don’t want the bullets scarring the steel of the gun barrel. Ever notice that no sparks fly from the front of the gun? That’s because you’re seeing lead bullets.

9. Sound Travels in Space

This is the granddaddy of all scientific complaints about space movies. For instance, in space the hero shouldn’t be able to shout out instructions to the other astronauts from a spot several yards away. The movie Aliens corrected this misimpression with its tagline: “In space, nobody can hear you scream.” And it’s true. Sound is the vibration of air, and it’s sensed when the air makes your eardrums vibrate. But try to forget this rule as soon as possible; it’ll wreck a good many movies for you.

From mental_floss' book Condensed Knowledge: A deliciously Irreverent Guide to Feeling Smart Again, published in Neatorama with permission. [Update 3/6/07: Originally written by UC Berkeley physics professor Richard Muller]

Be sure to visit mental_floss' extremely entertaining website and blog!



Comments (140)

Newest 5
Newest 5 Comments

The matrix wasn't real. why should it follow the rules of reality? the whole point was that they found people who could, for lack of a better term, hack the world...
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Accelerating towards a gap will not make you jump it, you'll still go in the hole, but if you are accelerating your car will probably land right side up, While if you slam on the breaks the nose of your car will go down, and you are more likely to land upside down.

Moral: If you can stop in time DO!
If you can't, giving it some gas increases you chances of landing on the tires, rather than your head.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Very interesting web site. One day, maybe everyone on the web with any brains or talent or

even without it will stumble on what we really are-us humans-AFTER they read "On Human

Nature" by E. O. Wilson. We can all learn from some serious thinking-before we eliminate

ourselves -or nature does it for us.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Accelerating towards a gap will not make you jump it, you'll still go in the hole, but if you are accelerating your car will probably land right side up, While if you slam on the breaks the nose of your car will go down, and you are more likely to land upside down.

Moral: If you can stop in time DO!
If you can't, giving it some gas increases you chances of landing on the tires, rather than your head.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
In Star Trek (2009), all shots of/in space has no audio. Like in the opening, when the ship was blowing up and loud noises occur, the camera follows a CGI humanoid get sucked out into space... and then you hear nothing.

A very realistic way to make it seem as though the viewer were actually in the movie...

~|K|~
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
The Koch brothers gave him a grant because they expected him to cast more doubt on the climate models, not affirm them. They, along with most conservatives, were FURIOUS when he reached the opposite conclusion last year. Their money was an upfront grant for the study. I'd be surprised if they gave him more (although stranger things have happened).

You might also be surprised about China. It's not as strong as it is in the US, but there's a growing environmental movement there. As their middle class grows, they've begun to realize that prosperity is useless if you're too sick to enjoy it due to a toxic environment. They're actually investing far more than the US in renewable energy sources. Really, we're playing a global game of the prisoners dilemma, where doing nothing is the equivalent of ratting out your neighbor. It also explains why inaction is the likely outcome.....
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Honestly, who cares about this guy? You are either convinced by the total concensus of experimentation and observation spanning the global scientific community...or you're convinced by the oil-funded rhetoric which is based on exactly no experimentation or observation. One physicist doesn't matter.

And to respond to timothyemerson, the first thing we can do about global warming is to get non-scientists to acknowledge it exists. Although I do know how hard it is for people to stop foaming at the mouth about taxes (even though raising taxes need not be a part of the solution.)
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
It seems to me the whole shrill discourse about global warming is a well funded attempt by oil companies to keep their pockets lined. It's common sense to move away from polluting fossil fuels and toward renewable sources. At the same time, making vehicles, energy production and hvac more efficient and cleaner is a no-brainer. Whether climate change is man-made or not is pretty much beside the point here.

Like the stealth funding of the tea-party, follow the money. Don't vote against your own best interests.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@ezpz you are easily one of my favorite commenters on here.
You are absolutely right about China, not only are they NOT going to stop but they are making new deals right now to ship even more coal from Wyoming all the way to Oregon, down the Columbia River and straight to China! (Wonder what that will do to the cost of coal for Americans?)
Fossil fuels will be used and burned, bought and sold, no matter how many global warming studies are done. Period. LOL!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
What could we possibly do about it, even if it were true? Stop breathing? Stop heating our homes? Stop raising cattle? Stop driving cars? What is it exactly that you would expect to be done to cause the temperatures to decrease?

Do you really think China is going to reduce the amount of fossil fuels that they use because some people claim that the planet is being heated up by Man? Do you?

LOL
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Timothy: "So, what shall we do about global warming then? "

Timothy, let not your heart be troubled. The AGW bleating is not worth a cup of warm spit. Nothing will be done because nothing will happen.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Timothy, we will do what we always do - nothing. We will wait until the last minute for the crisis to happen and then jump into action to try to fix the damage when it's already too late. Have no doubt, the planet will definitely survive, but life will start to become a little more... competitive.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
So, what shall we do about global warming then? Agree to higher taxes so that governments can move everyone to higher ground when the time comes or build a wall around land that is low enough like the Dutch? If it all comes to nothing and the water level doesn't rise enough, do we get our money back?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
How nice to see the term skeptic applied to someone who actually is a skeptic!

From the wikipedia entry on skepticism:
"A scientific (or empirical) skeptic is one who questions beliefs on the basis of scientific understanding. Most scientists, being scientific skeptics, test the reliability of certain kinds of claims by subjecting them to a systematic investigation using some form of the scientific method."

This is exactly what Muller did, which resulted in him changing his mind. This is also exactly what other so-called climate "skeptics" do not do. Calling them skeptics is a huge compliment they don't deserve. They are simply deniers, and denying doesn't require any work.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Email This Post to a Friend
"9 Laws of Physics That Don't Apply in Hollywood"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More