The World's Shortest and Longest Wars

Alex


The Harem and Palace of Zanzibar were destroyed in the Anglo-Zanzibar war of 1896. The Palace was never rebuilt, but the Harem (of course) was later rebuilt.

The World's Shortest War

The Anglo-Zanzibar war, also known as the world's shortest war, was over in under 45 minutes. The exact length of time is actually debatable - some had put it as short as 38 minutes - anyways, it was a very, very short war.

The whole thing started when the Sultan of Zanzibar, who had willingly cooperated with the British, died on August 25, 1896, and his nephew Khalid bin Bargash seized power in a coup. Thinking that another candidate would be easier to deal with, the British delivered an ultimatum to force the Bargash to abdicate.

Bargash refused the ultimatum and assembled a navy in form of the ex-Sultan's yacht, the HHS Glasgow and fortified the palace. The British, on the other hand, assembled 5 modern warships in the harbor in front of the palace and landed two battalions of army. Bargash tried a last-ditch negotiation effort through the US Embassy, but time soon ran out.

At 9:02 AM on August 27, 1896, when the ultimatum ran out, the British navy sank the Sultan's fleet (yes, that one yacht), shelled and destroyed the palace completely. About 500 people, mostly Bargash's soliders, died. Bargash ran and hid at the German Embassy, where he was later granted asylum. Depending on who you ask, the world's shortest war was over at 9:40 AM or so.

The World's Longest War

The world's longest war, on the other hand, spanned 355 335 years without a single shot fired. That war, between the United Provinces of Netherlands and the Isles of Scilly, got started in 1651 and the story goes as follows:

During the English Civil War (1642 - 1651), the Parliamentarians beat the Royalists further and further away from London, until it was forced to retreat to the Isles of Scilly off the Cornish coast. The Netherlands, which sided with the Parliamentarians, sent the Dutch Navy to fight the Royalist fleet.

The Dutch Navy was so badly beaten that the Netherlands decided to declare war. However, they couldn't blame England, since it was the Royalists in Scilly that caused them so much problem - so they declared war on the Isles in 1651 instead. Later that year, the Isles of Scilly fell to the Parliamentarians and the Dutch forgot all about the war (that is, until they fought the Brits again and again in the Anglo-Dutch War, the first of which started just 1 year later!)

In 1985, a local historian and Chairman of the Isles of Scilly Council Roy Duncan decided to look into the rumor that the Isles were still at war with the Netherlands. When the Dutch Embassy in London confirmed that there was an actual declaration of war and everything, Duncan invited the Dutch ambassador Jonkheer Huydecoper to Scilly to sign a peace treaty.

The peace treaty was signed on April 17, 1986, thus officially ending the war between the Netherlands and Isles of Scilly 335 years after it was declared!

Sources:
The Anglo-Zanzibar War of 1896 at BBC h2g2, Wikipedia
Zanzibar Courage at Global Frontiers
335 Year War at Scilly News, Wikipedia
Dutch Proclaim End of War Against Britain's Scilly Isles at NY Times

Quibbles?
Supposedly, an even longer war between Rome and Carthage, which started in 264 BC with the outbreak of the Punic Wars, "ended" with a peace treaty signed in 1985. That would've made it a 2,248-year war, except Carthage was completely destroyed by the Romans and its territory completely annexed. In 146 BC, Carthage's existence as a independent state was over.


Comments (29)

Newest 5
Newest 5 Comments

Canada;Eat me, i mean seriously who likes Canada anyone (besides Canadian smart asses)your beer really does suck, nobody likes your culture, you guys have a reputation for what, so what about free health care i mean its nice but is that it that's good about Canada, your military frankly sucks dick, i feel America should hurry up and connect Alaska to the rest of the US (it wouldn't be that hard to do), your weed Duane really why even bring it up, your an idiot, in the war of 1812 America came back and kicked Britain's ass which has almost nothing to do with Canada besides the fact that Britain occupied Canada at the time, basically what I'm saying is Canada sucks,oh and fuck you Canada for ruining KFC by bringing it home and calling it PFK.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Great headline, but really, while I think it's a fashion crime to wear one's pants like that, making it an actual crime is ridiculous. Have they solved all the cases in their department and run out of doughnuts?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
they wanna have this image where when you look at them you can tell they are thinking "i don't care. i don't care about anything, ESPECIALLY whether or not my pants are at a sensible height."

or at least thats why i would do it.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I remeber readingonce that dungarees became a fashion item as folks wished to mimic jail house garb- in an "I'm in solidarity with the brothers against the man" sort of theory... so I'm guessing the saggy pants comes from mimicking homeless folks in an : "I'm in solidarity with the homeless, against the corporate rich"... I saw one 16yr.old boy rececntly (white and thoroughly middle class) with his pants completely below his butt (he was wearing boxers to cover his skin, but it was way clear that he went out of his way to do this), and then a tight belt kept them there... he could barely walk as he tried to be cool, but he did have two hot girls with him, so he must be onto something... I also heard a story a while back of some kid wearing his jeans this way, went running down a grassy hill toward a parking lot, the pants kept dropping as he sped up, and he did a serious lip dive into the pavement, seriously injuring himself.
Me personally, I never wear pants, so my ass is always out on parade;)
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
it is the fashion statement of the hip hop culture. It became more mainstream around the mid 90's and it is starting to die about now but there are still some offenders that are not up to date with the times. Personally i think it was stupid cause it would always leave me ass freezing and it meant if i forgot my belt to school that day (yes we needed belts to keep it at the perfect angle), then i would be keeping my hands inside my pockets all day to prevent them from falling down.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
The original reason for super-baggy pants is to more easily conceal drugs and weapons, and aid in shop-lifting. I think it caught on outside the ghetto because a bunch of fat white people saw rappers doing it and thought, "Hey, that looks comfortable... and will hide my rolls of fat!"
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I'm totally white as they come, but I think I understood the trend came from prisons, where the inmates are not allowed to have belts.

The baggy pants thing has been around FOREVER, and they are JUST NOW getting offended by it?

It's such a huge part of the culture now. It's just asinine (hee!) to outlaw it.

Can we outlaw mullets while we're at it?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Actually, the sagging pants trend was started in prison. Inmates are not allowed to have belts to prevent them from hanging themselves. And when the guards issue the inmates their new wardrobe, it hardly ever fits perfectly, so the pants sag. Then, the trend worked its way into hip-hop. Later, mainstream culture kicked in, and the rest is history.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
It did start in prison. Partly because belts are not allowed, but also to show "relationship" status. If you sagged it meant you were taken. And taking it.....
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Well, since I live in a city near Flint, as ridiculous as it might be, they WILL find alot of drugs and weapons if they start approaching these idiots.

Hell, if they got the manpower and we can keep em away from the Krispy Kreme in Flint, send some cops up my way!

My city laid almost all of em off!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I hate the "fashion," but think that it's taking it too far to make a law against it. I always heard that sagging pants in prison indicated that the wearer was available. And a trend that is equally confusing to me is the (white) boys who wear skintight jeans that don't go up far enough to cover their business, and have the boxer shorts hanging out. Or the belted-below-the-butt look.

I come from a generation that has plenty to answer for in the fashion faux pas department (mullets, parachute pants, Valley Girls, etc.) and I still find baggy pants intolerable to look at. Maybe it's the function of each generation to piss off and look stupid to the one before it.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I cant believe that an enforce of the law is trying to make new ones because he doesnt like how pants are being worn. If I go to the beach right now I know that I will see more crack there then in all of downtown bumfuk flint. This is just stupid that he is worried about stoping them from wearing pants too low instead of doing something constructive.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I think they eventually get what they deserve for abusing fashion that way. There's no need to make it an actual crime.

I've seen so many saggy-pants actually fall down, and I've seen even more people that are wearing them trip as they try to run. They're great fun for onlookers!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Will and WO are correct. I used to teach in South Central Los Angeles and Compton, and believe me, there's nothing more disrespectful than a kid leaning over with his butt toward you and his ass hanging out (even though covered by boxers). It's the big shirts that hang down to the knees that cover all the goodies such as drugs, arms, etc.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
i'm not male so i don't know this personally, but i've dated guys who said a certain amount of sagging was for comfort, but added that sagging more than just a couple inches was excessive. so i can agree with that much. i don't care either way.. yes, it's ridiculous and i can't believe it's an actual fashion statement, but c'mon-- they are ASKING to be ridiculed. feel free to put them in their place by openly making fun of the fact that they force themselves to walk like penguins. i think it's hilarious to see someone with their feet out as wide as they can get with a bunch of denim bunched up between their knees and their feet.. seriously. it looks like they're 3 years old waiting for their mommy to pull their pants up after making poopy. if they want to look like that, they have whatever they get coming to 'em. you don't see many full-grown adults doing this, so we can bet that it's just another teen fad that will go away sooner or later.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Instead of arresting them they should just finish the job. Pull the pants all the way down, take a picture and post it instantly on the police website.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Email This Post to a Friend
"The World's Shortest and Longest Wars"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More