Library Tossing Out the Classics: No One Read ‘Em!

By Alex in Book & Literature on Jan 4, 2007 at 6:23 pm

The bells may toll for Hemingway’s For Whom the Bell Tolls – a Washington-area library is tossing out books that haven’t been checked out in years.

Unfortunately, this means classics like books by Hemingway, Faulkner, Proust, and so on:

A software program developed by SirsiDynix, an Alabama-based library-technology company, informs librarians of which books are circulating and which ones aren’t. If titles remain untouched for two years, they may be discarded–permanently. "We’re being very ruthless," boasts library director Sam Clay.

As it happens, the ruthlessness may not ultimately extend to Hemingway’s
classic. "For Whom the Bell Tolls" could win a special reprieve, and, in the future, copies might remain available at certain branches. Yet lots of other volumes may not fare as well. Books by Charlotte Brontë, William Faulkner, Thomas Hardy, Marcel Proust and Alexander Solzhenitsyn have recently been pulled.

Library officials explain, not unreasonably, that their shelf space is limited and that they want to satisfy the demands of the public. Every unpopular book that’s removed from circulation, after all, creates room for a new page-turner by John Grisham, David Baldacci, or James Patterson–the authors of the three most checked-out books in Fairfax County last month.

Link – via Metafilter


Email This Post
Tweet This Post 
Share This Post on Facebook


Neat stuff from the NeatoShop:


  1. Gloria
    Jan 4th, 2007 at 7:55 pm

    That’s kinda sad.

  2. Moon
    Jan 4th, 2007 at 8:39 pm

    Geez, go check out some of the classics, quick!

  3. Jenny
    Jan 4th, 2007 at 10:10 pm

    Oh, no. That means nothing left on the shelves but Danielle Steel and all that other faddish trash…
    Although, personally, I like to own classics so I can write in them.

  4. dead_red_eyes
    Jan 5th, 2007 at 1:40 am

    That’s bloody awful …

  5. Lex 10
    Jan 5th, 2007 at 8:48 am

    This is why open source ILS for libraries are important. It gives the power back to the library, not the accountants who own some geeks.

    Wikipedia ILS and see whats available.

  6. hannah
    Jan 5th, 2007 at 11:08 am

    It is sad. when I look for certain books that I thought would be standard at my library, all I come up with is audiobooks. We’re talking Slaughterhouse Five, The Picture of Dorian Gray…

  7. amy
    Jan 5th, 2007 at 2:21 pm

    thats just sad, but whats sadder is that no one is reading them anymore.

  8. Gloria
    Jan 5th, 2007 at 4:13 pm

    Honestly, when I read a classic, I buy it. Classics are so cheap, and I can take all the time I need. The only books I check out from the library was rare academic books or art books, both of which are too expensive to own.

  9. ted
    Jan 6th, 2007 at 9:05 am

    Geez, how stuffy and elitist can we all sound today?
    Dorian Gray? Come on – that’s like the dullest thing Wilde wrote.

    We’ve lost the literature of entire civilizations before. This is just the gradual process. How many people are going to check out Samuel Pepys’ diary? How many plays by 17th-century playwrights other than Shakespeare are performed nowadays? How many of us have read Chaucer lately? You know, for fun.

    Funny how in the “Information Age”, libraries have become less and less relevant to our daily lives.

  10. Semolina Pilchard
    Jan 21st, 2007 at 1:38 am

    Ted, just so you feel better — I bought a nice hardcover copy of The Canterbury Tales not too long ago and have been reading a story now and then just for fun. But the news about that library is just nauseating.


Keep track of the comments with Comment RSS

Don't Miss: New Stuff | Bestsellers | The Cute Store
                   Funny T-Shirts

Need a gift? Get unforgettable gifts for:
Geeks | Pranksters | Kids | Hipsters | Shutterbugs

Lijit Search

Old school? Bookmark us! RSS Feed Twitter Facebook Page