Fashion Incident.

By Miss Cellania in Fashion on Dec 7, 2006 at 12:09 pm

red.png

At a White House holiday reception, three women appeared wearing the same red dress! It was an $8500 Oscar de la Renta gown. But thats not the worst of it… First Lady Laura Bush also wore the same dress! Mrs. Bush did the diplomatic thing and went upstairs and changed, but not before an official holiday group photo was taken. Link -via J-Walk Blog


Email This Post
Tweet This Post 
Share This Post on Facebook


Neat stuff from the NeatoShop:


  1. Britt
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 12:40 pm

    Yes, this is TOP NEWS.

  2. Bratt
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 12:53 pm

    Yes, Britt, and this is a TOP NEWS site.

    The worst part is that it’s kind of an ugly dress.

  3. Britt
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 1:24 pm

    I wasn’t critisising it being on Neatorama, I was critisising its appearance as MAJOR NEWS on the page it was linked from. Lord knows that this is truly the biggest story ever.

  4. Jake
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 1:29 pm

    I would not be caught dead in that dress…

    …if I was a woman, that is. ;)

    It’s quite ugly, methinks.

  5. Miss Cellania
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 1:32 pm

    For $8500, it’d better make me look young, slim, and intelligent!

    I guess it would make me look rich…

  6. donna
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 2:03 pm

    For $8500, I could buy an entire colllection of far, far better looking dresses.

    Honestly, I always thought Laura shopped at Walmart. That dress looks like it’s made from somebody’s flocked wallpaper.

  7. Matthew
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 2:09 pm

    From the cbs “top story”:

    “Three women donned the exact same $8,500 red Oscar de la Renta dress, a fashion faux pas in itself. But that’s just the beginning of this debacle of ladies in red.

    It just so happened that First Lady Laura Bush was wearing the very same dress too.”

    Who knew that the First Lady was not a woman??

  8. Is this the airport clark?
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 2:32 pm

    Ohhh. Was there a sale at Dress Barn?!

  9. iggles
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 2:33 pm

    There’s only one dress, they just took turns wearing it!

  10. Acedia
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 2:50 pm

    I’m betting that hell will freeze over before any of these ladies buys an Oscar de la Renta gown again.

    Then again, two ladies in the same dress would be embarassing. Four brings the whole thing to a level of absurdity that would have to make the situation pretty funny even if you were one of the four bridewmaids” (hell, that getup is ugly enough to have been a bridesmaid dress — at a wedding with a particularly sadistic bride.)

    The **** people will buy and wear just because it’s a designer label!

  11. Billy
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 2:54 pm

    It’s obviously a mirror trick.

  12. Mike Scott
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 2:55 pm

    Here’s the smoking gun! Just goes to show that Conservative women really are mindless drone who share the same group consciousness! Nay, perhaps “hive collective” is a better description…

    Screw the “Stepford Wives” metaphor…can you say “Borg”?

    You WILL be assimilated, and your individual distinctiveness will be harnessed to serve us…

  13. Joshua Cyr
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 3:02 pm

    Ah, but how many actually paid that much. Maybe someone paid even more? When a dress is $8500 you know there is a negotiation before final purchase.

  14. Kevin Burton
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 3:13 pm

    Too bad they didn’t have a white stain…… we might be able to impeach this guy!

  15. little willy
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 3:26 pm

    Yeah, I know the same thing happened to me. Just the other day, Myself and four other programmers all wore jeans to work.

    How embarrassing!!!!!

  16. Fishy
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 3:27 pm

    Not to be a downer on the sassy commentary, but why is the First Lady wearing $8500-worth of dress when the poverty level is where it is?

  17. yes
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 3:33 pm

    Fishy,

    because Merkins keep electing rich people to be president?

  18. Alex
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 3:52 pm

    $8500!!! My entire wardrobe doesn’t hit 1/10th of what that dress costs!

  19. Larua Bush
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 5:22 pm

    Those bitches knew exactly what they were doing. I’ve convinced George to send them all on vacation to the beautiful resort at Guantanamo Bay.

  20. aTexan
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 7:20 pm

    Dear Laura,

    How much Humvee armor could $8500 buy?

  21. George
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 8:07 pm

    Not to be a downer on the sassy commentary, but why is the First Lady wearing $8500-worth of dress when the poverty level is where it is?

    Maybe ask Hillary Clinton; I’m certain she’d know. Not that she’d deign to answer, but she would know.

    I think the fact that so many people are so enthralled with who wears what and how much it cost is the saddest commentary of all. Are all elected officials, including the First Family supposed to take a vow of poverty when they take office?

  22. stendhalismo
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 10:09 pm

    NO, the true scandal is: I think I saw that same red dress at my local ross ‘crossdress for less’ the other evening – are we sure these are four women?

  23. Moon
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 10:34 pm

    I just a got a new Armani tux, and let me tell you, it makes even me look good. Seriously.

    I think you should complain if these fatcats aren’t contributing to charities, etc., but if they are giving and helping, sometimes a nice, well fitting piece of clothing is really sweet.

    And, it’s not a Hummer, which every redneck seems to need. You want to complain, complain about a guy who spends $45,000 on a Hummer that is just wasting resources.

  24. notarealname
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 11:17 pm

    At least Laura looks the hottest.

  25. Blacknimbus
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 11:25 pm

    She can sit on the White House lawn and burn a pile of 8500 one dollar bills if she wants to. It’s her money and this is still a free country.

    Che is dead and the Iron Curtain fell a long time ago…give it up. Capitalisim won. And stop pretending like you cared about Humvee armor before you read the talking point on Kos and DU and stop worrying about successful people having a good time. You sound like a bunch of jealous Puritans.

  26. ouch
    Dec 7th, 2006 at 11:51 pm

    Please someone, anyone…bomb us to smithereens. It’s our only hope.

  27. Nahanni
    Dec 8th, 2006 at 1:41 am

    Fishy has no problems with Hillary Clinton spending the same amounts of money for a dress. Nor would he have problems with her banning anyone who was wearing the same dress like she did when she was first lady. He also has no problems with Hillary paying $500 for a haircut, either.

    yes seems to have no problems with John Kerry being gigalo to a billionairess with 5 houses.

    He has no problems with Teddy Kennedy’s millions that his father earned the hard way-smuggling booze across the border.

    He has no problems with John Edwards and his millions earned chasing ambulances.

    He seems to have no problems with Nancy Pelosi and her millions, either. Millions earned in part by her making sure that her family got a BIG cut from the decomissioning of the Presidio. I am sure he has no problems with her hiring “undocumented sharecroppers” to work in her vinyards in Napa, either. I bet she doesn’t pay them minimum wage.

    Nor does he have any problems with Al Gore not only being in politics and the high priest of the “global warming” church owning over 20 million dollars of Occidental Petroleum stock, either. Nope-dey jus’ some po’ white boys.

    ouch: Don’t worry, you will get your wish.

  28. actor212
    Dec 8th, 2006 at 8:58 am

    Oh dear…some programming in the Stepford Wives had a glitch! I’m sure they’re sending a team of programmers to fix it…

  29. actor212
    Dec 8th, 2006 at 9:01 am

    George Says:
    Are all elected officials, including the First Family supposed to take a vow of poverty when they take office?

    Uhhhhh, no, but it would be nice if they spent, like most Americans, a decent amount on their clothes.

    I understand how these things work: De La Renta gifted the dress to the White House (recall how Nancy Reagan had to give her dresses back when she left?), and Laura got to wear it.

    BUt really…when most people in this country can’t afford an $850 suit, what’s the point in having her wear an $8500 gown? Wouldn’t a $1,000 gown cover her just as well?

  30. actor212
    Dec 8th, 2006 at 9:02 am

    Nahanni Says:
    December 8th, 2006 at 1:41 am
    Fishy has no problems with Hillary Clinton spending the same amounts of money for a dress.

    Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, she never has. Read my post. And her normal wardrobe is perfectly sensible, and sensibly priced.

    Maybe that’s why you hate her so much: she’s a sensible woman!

  31. ted
    Dec 8th, 2006 at 9:49 am

    Enough already with the politics, you dolts.
    The rich are running the country, and not the poor?
    All big-name politicians are filthy rich, and they show it.

    Except for Hillary Clinton, of course. She only showed up at parties in dresses that she sewed herself, or bought at the Goodwill store, because she’s sensible, and not at all extravagant like the Evil Republicans.

    Why, just the other day, she was spotted at a Wal-Mart, rummaging through the Clearance section. When she was discovered, she quickly hopped onto a local bus to avoid the publicity.

  32. Debra
    Dec 9th, 2006 at 2:31 am

    I tried to resist– but this drew me in. It’s late and I’m easily entertained. The dress? only the fool hearted buy off the rack.

  33. peej
    Dec 9th, 2006 at 6:06 am

    “did the diplomatic thing” ? Diplomatic would have been to stay in the same dress. Or offering her wardrobe to the others to change.
    By going off and changing she left the other three to face the embarassment alone.

  34. Thatgirl
    Dec 10th, 2006 at 7:17 pm

    What a yukky dress.. red makes the women look pale and washed out and the neckline makes their shoulders seem even heftier. They look like christmas tomatoes. For ten grand you could spend a pretty stellar week in Cuba instead of moping about at the House with Lady Laura. Oh well, each to their own.

  35. Thatgirl
    Dec 10th, 2006 at 7:19 pm

    * I meant bags of Christmas tomatoes

    my vicious streak duly exercised, I shall depart..

  36. H8
    Dec 11th, 2006 at 1:01 am

    “Moon Says:
    December 7th, 2006 at 10:34 pm

    I think you should complain if these fatcats aren’t contributing to charities, etc., but if they are giving and helping, sometimes a nice, well fitting piece of clothing is really sweet.”

    New Orleans is still in terrible shape, and they still refuse to lift a finger to help… That 8500 could have made one house livable again… Too bad, so sad. We pay them, and pay to rebuild one of our nations hot spots. Imagine that, cut the damn middle man already… This is just BS, and further rectifies my hate for my country.

  37. Gerhardius
    Dec 11th, 2006 at 1:50 am

    What about most of the men at the party showing up in the same suit? That is seriously tacky.


Keep track of the comments with Comment RSS

Don't Miss: New Stuff | Bestsellers | The Cute Store
                   Funny T-Shirts

Need a gift? Get unforgettable gifts for:
Geeks | Pranksters | Kids | Hipsters | Shutterbugs

Lijit Search

Old school? Bookmark us! RSS Feed Twitter Facebook Page