This article is nothing more than alarmist, unproven luddite fear-mongering. That it lists "potential radiation emission" as a hazard ought to be enough for anyone with a modicum of scientific literacy to question the validity of any of these "points". Claims like "Exposure to technology is bad for rapid brain growth of children from 0 to 2 years of age" and "The way children are raised and educated with technology is unsustainable" are broad, vague, and meaningless.
An iPad or a smartphone is just a tool, and like any other tool, it's as good or bad as how it's used. My under 2-year old plays "Endless Reader" on the iPad and has learned to recognize the shapes of letters and words, and the sounds they make. That app is kind of ridiculously impressive, and you should check it out if you want to see an example of technology being used to provide a superior learning experience. Other apps have been very effective at teaching her colors and shapes and counting. A good app can be even more interactive, dynamic, and engaging than a See-and-Say or Speak-and-Spell, or any other good toy. That it involves a touch screen doesn't suddenly make it a hazard to children.
TV isn't bad for kids, either- it's commercial TV's vast array of idiotic content presented in alternating 5 -10 minute segments of content followed by 30 seconds, 30 seconds, 30 seconds, etc of ads which is teaching them nothing and practically conditioning them to have attention problems. The PBS app is great because it makes a vast amount of quality educational content available for her to explore at her own pace and without commercials or having to worry about her running across inappropriate content. I think she has actually learned quite a bit watching Curious George, Peg + Cat, Daniel Tiger, etc..
Should you let your kid do nothing but play on the iPad all day, or take it to bed with them? Of course not, but you don't have to shield your kid from technology like it's the devil, and you'll just be doing them a disservice if you do- the fact is it will be an even bigger part of their lives than it is in ours. Your child will be worse off being unfamiliar with it, and could very well fall behind their peers by missing out on its massive potential as a learning tool.
An iPad or a smartphone is just a tool, and like any other tool, it's as good or bad as how it's used. My under 2-year old plays "Endless Reader" on the iPad and has learned to recognize the shapes of letters and words, and the sounds they make. That app is kind of ridiculously impressive, and you should check it out if you want to see an example of technology being used to provide a superior learning experience. Other apps have been very effective at teaching her colors and shapes and counting. A good app can be even more interactive, dynamic, and engaging than a See-and-Say or Speak-and-Spell, or any other good toy. That it involves a touch screen doesn't suddenly make it a hazard to children.
TV isn't bad for kids, either- it's commercial TV's vast array of idiotic content presented in alternating 5 -10 minute segments of content followed by 30 seconds, 30 seconds, 30 seconds, etc of ads which is teaching them nothing and practically conditioning them to have attention problems. The PBS app is great because it makes a vast amount of quality educational content available for her to explore at her own pace and without commercials or having to worry about her running across inappropriate content. I think she has actually learned quite a bit watching Curious George, Peg + Cat, Daniel Tiger, etc..
Should you let your kid do nothing but play on the iPad all day, or take it to bed with them? Of course not, but you don't have to shield your kid from technology like it's the devil, and you'll just be doing them a disservice if you do- the fact is it will be an even bigger part of their lives than it is in ours. Your child will be worse off being unfamiliar with it, and could very well fall behind their peers by missing out on its massive potential as a learning tool.