R. Sherman's Comments
Actually, this is not Wal-Mart's fault. The provisions in the policy allowing this are mandated by Federal Law (ERISA). This law allows employers to provide health insurance to workers with the insurance being considered taxable income for the workers. Additionally, the premiums paid by the company are tax deductible by the company which provides an incentive for employers to give health insurance.
Wal-Mart may have some shifty business practices but this is not one of them.
Regards.
Wal-Mart may have some shifty business practices but this is not one of them.
Regards.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
I'm a lawyer and Alienation of Affections is nothing new, at least here in Missouri. Another similar tort is "Criminal Conversation," which is basically the same thing, assuming one can prove consummation of an adulterous relationship. Many states have eliminated these torts because they assume what amounts to a property right in one's spouse, a position which flies in the face of current thought.
Regards.