George Lucas Strikes Back ... with Low Income Housing

For 25 years, George Lucas tried to develop a portion of his 6,100-acre property in the posh hills of Marin into an expansion site for his movie production company. But his neighbors, fearing traffic and disruption to their neighborhood, blocked the plan.

Now, in a move worthy of a Star Wars saga, the famous filmmaker struck back with an audacious plan:

... after spending years and millions of dollars, Mr. Lucas abruptly canceled plans recently for the third, and most likely last, major expansion, citing community opposition. An emotional statement posted online said Lucasfilm would build instead in a place “that sees us as a creative asset, not as an evil empire.”

If the announcement took Marin by surprise, it was nothing compared with what came next. Mr. Lucas said he would sell the land to a developer to bring “low income housing” here.

Norimitsu Onishi of The New York Times reports: Link  (Photo: Wikipedia)

Go George! I've always thought you were a pompous a$$ until now.

Number1Guy--I'm surprised a shut-in like yourself feels qualified to comment on the world outside your feculent apartment. The majority? Please.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@RD - your assessment is correct, sir or madam. More importantly, your response was not inflammatory, and added to the discussion of the topic at hand.

See how it's done, assholes?
Think of the children before you post, or take them to see any Lucas movie.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Though the article specifically addresses that it is not a nusance move, but one of charity. Good for you Mr. Lucas. Though in the second version of the development plans, he is going to make some signifigant changes. Perhaps there is someone who could smuggle out a copy of those plans? Ok, enough. =)
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Commenting is a part of the blog that definitely needs to be improved. It will require a balance between trying to keep the comment section open to facilitate discussion and yet keep the discourse civil.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Man, there's a lot of classist assholes on Neatorama. From these comments, I guess it's safe to say that the majority of folks here are assholes. If you disagree and say that you aren't an asshole, I'll just say you are the minority. Wow. Your IQ is showing, too.
Kids, this area is unsafe.
Please, think of the children.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Just did a quick look at zoning regs.
The lowest single family zoning requires a minimum of 2 acre lot. Mobile home parks are allowed but the regulations are so strict that unless you have one grandfathered in it isn't going to happen. Multifamily requires minimum of 2500 sq ft building per dwelling unit. Thats a nice sized house.
So in other words there isn't going to be what most of us consider low income housing going on this property. Now the people that live in the area probably consider anything under a house that sells for couple of million $ low income but i don't.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
By the way the article says affordable housing not low income housing. In an area where the land alone probably cost 10 k or more an acre, what they consider affordable housing there is still going to be well out of the average persons price range.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Doesn't Marian have a planning & zoning department? Assuming the the neighbors stopped his studio expansion because he couldn't get the land rezoned from residential to commercial. Chances are its zoned as a particular type of residential. Certain square footage buildings on certain square footage lots. So they aren't going to be able to put low income housing next to a millionaires house even if they want too. Unless of course the developer wants to provide a huge lot & building for under what it cost him to build it.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@An0n - totally agree. Nail on the head.
@number1guy - No, I don't know. Please, tell me who constitutes this majority of leeches within the welfare receiving population.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Just more proof George Lucas is a complete asshole.

These people spend all their money(hard earned or not) so they can live out in the Californian country, then this jerk comes along and tries to build a gaudy movie studio in their back yards to pollute the world with more of his awful movies. Then when they disagree he becomes as small as he actually is and decided to use these poor poor-people to settle a grudge against his neighbors.

Seriously what good could possibly be in it for the poor. Not like there is a huge economy around the Lucas ranch where they will be able to find work.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Or, you could be someone like me and my family. We work. We don't commit crimes. We try to raise our families well. We try to do our best for the community in which we live. We pay taxes. We just don't make a lot of money.

And, just in case you are wondering, Number1, I do not use welfare.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Low income housing brings in the welfare leeches, and we all know who the majority is within that populace. This is how once praiseworthy towns have turned into gang infested and drug saturated ghettos.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 19 comments




Email This Post to a Friend
"George Lucas Strikes Back ... with Low Income Housing"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More