Moms Shooting Guns in Slow-Mo [YouTube - Link]A new public service announcement for Amber Watch Alert shows mother-ish types going all John Rambo with automatic weapons -in slow motion, no less.From the Upcoming ueue, submitted by jaimec. Comments (15) Newest 5 Newest 5 Comments lol.That was so stupid. Close your mouth!I love how the shell hit the one lady in the head - Boink!I think the results are a little muddled - not sure what their exact message was. Seems to be a reductio ad absurdum argument, somehow.To the issue at hand: aren't the majority of child abductions done by non-custodial parents? This would seem to encourage violent divorce action. Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.) W... T... F... Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.) Sooo, we give automatic weapons to kids?I don't think I understand...:p Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.) Sounds more like liberal anti-gun rhetoric than a child saftey PSA. Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.) @ John Smith - I had the exact same thought about the commercial. Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.) Login to comment. Click here to view up to the first 100 of this post's 15 comments
lol.That was so stupid. Close your mouth!I love how the shell hit the one lady in the head - Boink!I think the results are a little muddled - not sure what their exact message was. Seems to be a reductio ad absurdum argument, somehow.To the issue at hand: aren't the majority of child abductions done by non-custodial parents? This would seem to encourage violent divorce action. Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Sooo, we give automatic weapons to kids?I don't think I understand...:p Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Sounds more like liberal anti-gun rhetoric than a child saftey PSA. Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@ John Smith - I had the exact same thought about the commercial. Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
That was so stupid. Close your mouth!
I love how the shell hit the one lady in the head - Boink!
I think the results are a little muddled - not sure what their exact message was. Seems to be a reductio ad absurdum argument, somehow.
To the issue at hand: aren't the majority of child abductions done by non-custodial parents? This would seem to encourage violent divorce action.
I don't think I understand...
:p