KIK000's Comments
I find it repulsive that a sports coach earns more (and that much more) than an academic professor. Salary should be based on merit, not on popularity or need or any other silly lopsided metric they are using now.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
what if the pills are cyanide?
You take one now and...
the other two last you forever.
You take one now and...
the other two last you forever.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
1. Rogue Touch Pocket Watch LED Watch - Green+GreenLED
2. Schrodinger's Cat: Wanted Dead And/Or Alive - Small - Chocolate
3. Anatomical Heart Pencil Holder
2. Schrodinger's Cat: Wanted Dead And/Or Alive - Small - Chocolate
3. Anatomical Heart Pencil Holder
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Oh wow, I take back my "confirmation" then. Still, like you said thats a remarkably proper English. I still think it's a hoax, not sure anymore though. =p
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
I can confirm that this is a fake. Those are Japanese characters there. There is some Kanji but a lot is Katakana (and the majority is gibberish) and while the 2 languages do share Kanji they absolutely do not share Katakana.
Silly joke is silly.
Silly joke is silly.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
She is cute, but the dad's laugh is the perfect ending to the video "ahahaha"
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
I went to the Link and like others I found the top comment to be more interesting than the actual article there.
I am copying said comment, authored by A_Lee here:
"Not to be a downer, but while you are indeed looking at DNA, you aren't looking at a single strand of DNA. Whoever told you that is mistaken.
If any one is interested in the details, the first image (which looks more like a photograph), is a scanning-electron micrograph (SEM) image. The second, which looks more 2D and grainy, is a transmission-electron micrograph (TEM) image.
First, a description of what you are looking at. You are looking a a bundle of DNA fibers. Their are seven DNA strands, six in a hexagonal wrapping around one core. The reason we know this is because (a) the paper says so, and (b) the strand is far too thick to be one single strand. It's about 20 nanometers thick, which is too thick to be single-strand DNA.
Now, the images.
The SEM image shows the DNA strand suspended over two pillars. It's almost certainly coated with some metal, probably gold-palladium. It's taken at a fairly low resolution, the scale bar is probably in the 1-10 micron range, and the electron beam energy is very low, probably around 1-5keV. At this magnification and this energy level, you cannot actually "see" the DNA strand, anymore than we can "see" stars in the sky. We simply perceive a bright object against a dark background, but we don't have the resolution to distinguish between one star and two stars right next to each other.
The second image is a TEM image. TEM works like a slide projector, shining electrons through the object, and projecting them on the other side. It works with interference patterns (remember, quantum effects dominate here). So it is very good at finding tight periodic structures. In this case, the aligned "curls" of the DNA. What you are seeing is the change in atomic density along the DNA bundle. Imagine a super-long gummy worm that alternates between very short red and green segments. Now put seven of them together in a bundle, making sure that each colored segment matches up. Then step away, and you'll perceive a single, thick, gummy worm with alternating red and green lines. That's what you're seeing here.
Still, imaging organic molecules is always difficult with electron beams, because they tend to fry them. So this is still quite an achievement."
I am copying said comment, authored by A_Lee here:
"Not to be a downer, but while you are indeed looking at DNA, you aren't looking at a single strand of DNA. Whoever told you that is mistaken.
If any one is interested in the details, the first image (which looks more like a photograph), is a scanning-electron micrograph (SEM) image. The second, which looks more 2D and grainy, is a transmission-electron micrograph (TEM) image.
First, a description of what you are looking at. You are looking a a bundle of DNA fibers. Their are seven DNA strands, six in a hexagonal wrapping around one core. The reason we know this is because (a) the paper says so, and (b) the strand is far too thick to be one single strand. It's about 20 nanometers thick, which is too thick to be single-strand DNA.
Now, the images.
The SEM image shows the DNA strand suspended over two pillars. It's almost certainly coated with some metal, probably gold-palladium. It's taken at a fairly low resolution, the scale bar is probably in the 1-10 micron range, and the electron beam energy is very low, probably around 1-5keV. At this magnification and this energy level, you cannot actually "see" the DNA strand, anymore than we can "see" stars in the sky. We simply perceive a bright object against a dark background, but we don't have the resolution to distinguish between one star and two stars right next to each other.
The second image is a TEM image. TEM works like a slide projector, shining electrons through the object, and projecting them on the other side. It works with interference patterns (remember, quantum effects dominate here). So it is very good at finding tight periodic structures. In this case, the aligned "curls" of the DNA. What you are seeing is the change in atomic density along the DNA bundle. Imagine a super-long gummy worm that alternates between very short red and green segments. Now put seven of them together in a bundle, making sure that each colored segment matches up. Then step away, and you'll perceive a single, thick, gummy worm with alternating red and green lines. That's what you're seeing here.
Still, imaging organic molecules is always difficult with electron beams, because they tend to fry them. So this is still quite an achievement."
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Kisai Rogue Touch Pocket Watch LED Watch - Green + Green LED.
Schroedinger's Cat: Wanted Dead And/Or Alive - T-shirt - Small - Chocolate.
Hand Stand - Phone Stand
Schroedinger's Cat: Wanted Dead And/Or Alive - T-shirt - Small - Chocolate.
Hand Stand - Phone Stand
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
“Do they want people to believe the region has no poor people ...?"
Regardless of whether there are or aren't poor people, being poor doesn't give them the right to bother people. One thing is to be in need and ask for help, but an entirely different is to think you are entitled to other's help and that it's OK to follow around and nagg at people during their leisure time.
Regardless of whether there are or aren't poor people, being poor doesn't give them the right to bother people. One thing is to be in need and ask for help, but an entirely different is to think you are entitled to other's help and that it's OK to follow around and nagg at people during their leisure time.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
She deserves to be thrown in jail or a mental institution. Obviously she's delusional. Or perhaps someone should take the liberty of restoring her brain faculties, with a rusty spoon, without asking her for permission. I bet her next-door neighbor can do a great job of it.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
hmm.. maybe Ayn Rand got a bit of inspiration for 'Atlas Shrugged' from this?
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
I've heard of parasites that get into ants or snails and make them climb to the tip of grass blades or plants, which gets them eaten by birds or other predators which incubate the offspring of the parasites in their bodies and then excrete them where ants or snails will then get infected. They call them Zombie Parasites I think. In fact, I may have learned of this right here at Neatorama.
This behavior looks exactly like that to me, but if a parasite can 'sense' a predator from inside the host I am at the same time impressed and really really scared.
Any Neato-Biologists or Neato-Zoologists care to comment on this?
This behavior looks exactly like that to me, but if a parasite can 'sense' a predator from inside the host I am at the same time impressed and really really scared.
Any Neato-Biologists or Neato-Zoologists care to comment on this?
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
>.< i was about to say the same thing...
Just FYI.. it's 'O Sole mio' Means "o sun of mine" or "my sunshine"
Just FYI.. it's 'O Sole mio' Means "o sun of mine" or "my sunshine"
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
How many of your acquaintances can say with certainty in which womb you were engendered? I doubt anybody will ever know.
I do see 2 small issues though.
1) Grandma's life was endangered
2) I understand the joy of motherhood, but there is a reason for "survival of the fittest" and if mommy's heart problems are genetic, forcing the birth of a new being with same problem seems a little selfish. (only a little though)(and there is the chance he will be as healthy as can be).
I do see 2 small issues though.
1) Grandma's life was endangered
2) I understand the joy of motherhood, but there is a reason for "survival of the fittest" and if mommy's heart problems are genetic, forcing the birth of a new being with same problem seems a little selfish. (only a little though)(and there is the chance he will be as healthy as can be).
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
The amount of awesome in this video is... I don't have words to describe it. So happy.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Phelps is not a champion because he smokes pot!
Armstrong is not a champion because... w/e.. we think he cheated!
The moon landing was Fake!
The holocaust never happened!
The world is not full of idiots. It does not make me sad at all.
Armstrong is not a champion because... w/e.. we think he cheated!
The moon landing was Fake!
The holocaust never happened!
The world is not full of idiots. It does not make me sad at all.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
This has got to be some disgustingly dirty mafia at work. Please say it is so!
Alternatively, the feds are a bunch of incompetent, imbecilic cretins with no grasp of reality.
I hope it's not the latter, I think I'm more afraid of that than a mafia.
Alternatively, the feds are a bunch of incompetent, imbecilic cretins with no grasp of reality.
I hope it's not the latter, I think I'm more afraid of that than a mafia.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
I still like it. Since I liked the old Neatorma I feel a sense of disloyalty saying this is better than the old version. It's definitely different and it's definitely not worse.
So I'll compromise and say that change is good and new features are great, and that I thoroughly enjoy it.
Good job Alex and good job Rommel
So I'll compromise and say that change is good and new features are great, and that I thoroughly enjoy it.
Good job Alex and good job Rommel
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
I found a couple of minor/unimportant "issues":
To avoid issues I'll replace the use of for { and }. (yes, I had to look up the code for those so they would print; First attempt they made the word "and" disappear hehe)
♦ If you spam-click the "Like this comment" heart, the number of likes starts decreasing. It wasn't clear weather this was actually "unlikeing" or just changing the numbers either.
♦ When trying to Sign Up, if you provide an email address that is already in use the message reads "Email Address is associated with an existing account - if it is yours, please initiation password recovery"
♦ Haven't checked other browsers, but while using Chrome [21.0.1180.60 m] (Windows 7 x64) if you click on "formatting tips" bellow the TEXTAREA for the comment, the menu drops down briefly and almost instantly closes back up.
♦ Same platform as before; Clicked on Edit post and made a change. Clicked on [Save Edit] button and it saved but it added the words "Save Edit Cancel" at bottom of post. Upon further inspection: When you click on Edit post it adds the tag {textarea} and {/textarea} arround the text that has been written and beneath that the line {button}Save Edit{/button} {button}Cancel{/button} which saves as text only given that it's actually within the actual TEXTAREA.
♦ (You are gonna laugh at this one Rommel) =p. Attempted to edit own post from home-page instead of actually clicking through to the article at "http://www.neatorama.com/2012/08/04/Welcome-to-the-New-Neatorama-2/"; I wrote "Same platform as before; C..." As soon as I pressed the letter "C" for "Clicked", the comment box was closed and as you can imagine the changes were not saved.
Hopefully no more to come =p.
At any rate, congratulations on the new look! I like it and am very glad to see Neatorama grow :)!
PS:I'm only doing this because I <3 Neatorama, not because I get some sick enjoyment of pointing out errors but rather because I want to help out.
Save Edit Cancel \
Save Edit Cancel - This is how many times I've edited this post. ;p
Save Edit Cancel /
Save Edit Cancel
Save Edit Cancel
To avoid issues I'll replace the use of for { and }. (yes, I had to look up the code for those so they would print; First attempt they made the word "and" disappear hehe)
♦ If you spam-click the "Like this comment" heart, the number of likes starts decreasing. It wasn't clear weather this was actually "unlikeing" or just changing the numbers either.
♦ When trying to Sign Up, if you provide an email address that is already in use the message reads "Email Address is associated with an existing account - if it is yours, please initiation password recovery"
♦ Haven't checked other browsers, but while using Chrome [21.0.1180.60 m] (Windows 7 x64) if you click on "formatting tips" bellow the TEXTAREA for the comment, the menu drops down briefly and almost instantly closes back up.
♦ Same platform as before; Clicked on Edit post and made a change. Clicked on [Save Edit] button and it saved but it added the words "Save Edit Cancel" at bottom of post. Upon further inspection: When you click on Edit post it adds the tag {textarea} and {/textarea} arround the text that has been written and beneath that the line {button}Save Edit{/button} {button}Cancel{/button} which saves as text only given that it's actually within the actual TEXTAREA.
♦ (You are gonna laugh at this one Rommel) =p. Attempted to edit own post from home-page instead of actually clicking through to the article at "http://www.neatorama.com/2012/08/04/Welcome-to-the-New-Neatorama-2/"; I wrote "Same platform as before; C..." As soon as I pressed the letter "C" for "Clicked", the comment box was closed and as you can imagine the changes were not saved.
Hopefully no more to come =p.
At any rate, congratulations on the new look! I like it and am very glad to see Neatorama grow :)!
PS:I'm only doing this because I <3 Neatorama, not because I get some sick enjoyment of pointing out errors but rather because I want to help out.
Save Edit Cancel \
Save Edit Cancel - This is how many times I've edited this post. ;p
Save Edit Cancel /
Save Edit Cancel
Save Edit Cancel
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
Evelyn This blog is not just about things you find Neat. It's about interesting things the authors find on the internet (http://www.neatorama.com/authors/)
I agree with you and the rest of the posters so far about the obsolescence of the video in question. I did not and would not vote for Obama, but the reasons the Kid was made to give are all invalid twisting of the truth if I'm not mistaken.
In my opinion it is interesting that the US is not impervious to ignorance. That people that would do and think the ideas portrayed in the video exist is a fact to keep in mind.
While the video is far from being neat, Neatorama just showed you something about reality that you dislike. NEAT! let's change it!
I agree with you and the rest of the posters so far about the obsolescence of the video in question. I did not and would not vote for Obama, but the reasons the Kid was made to give are all invalid twisting of the truth if I'm not mistaken.
In my opinion it is interesting that the US is not impervious to ignorance. That people that would do and think the ideas portrayed in the video exist is a fact to keep in mind.
While the video is far from being neat, Neatorama just showed you something about reality that you dislike. NEAT! let's change it!
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
1. Kisai Rogue Touch Pocket Watch - Green with Green LED
2. NeatoTurtle - Ash Gray - Small
3. Schroedinger's Cat: Wanted Dead And/Or Alive - Chocolate - Small
2. NeatoTurtle - Ash Gray - Small
3. Schroedinger's Cat: Wanted Dead And/Or Alive - Chocolate - Small
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
1. Kisai Rogue Touch wristwatch Green
2. Schroedinger's Cat: Wanted Dead And/Or Alive [Small Chocolate]
3. BREWZER - Pocket Toolx
2. Schroedinger's Cat: Wanted Dead And/Or Alive [Small Chocolate]
3. BREWZER - Pocket Toolx
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
The Key to Miss Cellania's heart which is guarded by her husband at all times.
Schrödinger's Bet - Small - Chocolate
Schrödinger's Bet - Small - Chocolate
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
1)/kisai/on_air_black/Natural+BlueLED (or Gold+OrangeLED)
2)Neatoramanaut - Small - Dark Grey
3)USB Hubman
Thanks for the fun :)
2)Neatoramanaut - Small - Dark Grey
3)USB Hubman
Thanks for the fun :)
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
wow! it's Angry Animator!
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
This probably is the video you saw a while ago. It's a very interesting concept but I only "get it" if somehow you are able to come down into the train below as you travel or go up to the small one on top as you near the station at which you want to get off. Otherwise I don't understand what you do if you want to keep going.
Also I don't see whiplash being a problem as I'm sure the small wagons on top have their own break system and they work on inertia and not by latching on to the train abruptly
Also I don't see whiplash being a problem as I'm sure the small wagons on top have their own break system and they work on inertia and not by latching on to the train abruptly
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
it's not a failure of math and it's not a failure of language either.
It is what it is, a theorem if you will; and a infinitely repeating number can not be applied to the finite things we deal with on a regular basis. If we wanted to talk about infinite things this would apply and perhaps be useful but how many times have you tried to measure something infinite in the past 6 months? and how many true statements can we, as the human race, make to describe things we think to be infinite?
Human beings tend to think what's easy to understand is correct and what is hard to comprehend must be wrong. Just because you can't find a use for this or because it seems like a difficult concept does not mean it is invalid or wrong or not worth talking about it. If it does not interest you.. walk away.
It is what it is, a theorem if you will; and a infinitely repeating number can not be applied to the finite things we deal with on a regular basis. If we wanted to talk about infinite things this would apply and perhaps be useful but how many times have you tried to measure something infinite in the past 6 months? and how many true statements can we, as the human race, make to describe things we think to be infinite?
Human beings tend to think what's easy to understand is correct and what is hard to comprehend must be wrong. Just because you can't find a use for this or because it seems like a difficult concept does not mean it is invalid or wrong or not worth talking about it. If it does not interest you.. walk away.
Abusive comment hidden.
(Show it anyway.)
I think the answer is because it's not the place for that, the military is a place where people train and defend our freedom, the police are there to protect and serve the law, and well.. you get the point.. why is college not the place to train and develop people's careers? how do "professional" sports fit in there?