Just remember, to get a verdict in a case like this, twelve people just as skeptical as you are about who's at fault, etc. have to be convinced after they have heard the evidence, and then vote. It's not easy to convince people in a case like this, and everyone wants to be fair, and they don't just shrug their shoulders and say, 'McDonald's can afford it' They sit there and listen to the evidence and decide based on the instructions the judge gives them for evaluating the evidence. It's easy to say this or that should have happened, but unless you were in that courtroom, heard the evidence and had to decide, you're working from ignorance.

Instantly reminiscent of Gary Larson's cartoon, 'How nature says do not touch.' He should get together with this guy: http://www.flickr.com/photos/37570815@N07/4148230637/

It works the other way too, like when you see people write about someone who had to 'tow the line', or other homonym misfitting.

Holy infringement, Batman!

To be picky, it looks like a fan pack rather than a jet pack. Lack of jets.

I always thought it was: teach a man to fish, and he'll sit out in a boat all day drinking beer.

Is there anything the I-toys can't turn into a more complicated, less fun activity?

It's comforting that everything that has to do with bicycle 'fashion' is horrifically ugly.

I guess quirky, inventive minds think alike! I was a rabid collector of Jaffe's books as a kid. I'm still grateful to my mom, who kept her promise to get me a MAD subscription for straight A's. I looked at some of the other stuff in your museum, and it's a lot of fun. I bet Al would get a kick out of it.

That should be 'Al Jaffe's MAD Inventions.'

I should correct. It's 'Al Jaffee's MAD Inventions,' of course.

No, because your cartoons are a direct descendant of 'Al Jaffee's Stupid Inventions' book series. And you might want to lighten up on taking metaphors literally, or you may go MAD.

Not even a hat tip to Al Jaffee?