HOME |
RSS | 
Gone are the days of a raised and hand and simple “Present.” Now students in one school district must submit a fingerprint to be counted in morning roll call.
The Washington County school district in Florida has a little problem with inconsistent attendance. After weighing their options, school officials decided to place finger scanners at the entrance to Chipley High School, where incoming students are scanned in each morning. Because most kids in the district ride buses every day, and because keeping track of everyone in the halls is difficult, the system will be moved to select buses for a trial period to determine if it’s a more efficient way to save time and to ensure students are accounted for from the time they arrive until they’re dropped off at home.
The program has been in place for about two months, and so far, attendance is up–but not everyone is happy about it.
Identity theft
There are questions about the security of a device that reads a fingerprint, “which is a unique, identifiable piece of information,” and then “stores it in a database, and links it to a name” (Kelly Hodgkins, Gizmodo). Being that the students are mostly minors, it’s a legitimate concern, and one that Washington Co. Schools Superintendent Sandra Cook is quick to dismiss: There are only four or five points recorded in each scan, which are translated into a 60-digit passcode. “We can’t go backwards with it. We can’t turn around and take that number and recreate the points on a finger.” (DailyMotion)
$$$
The scanners cost about $22,000. Per student, this breaks down to about $30 a year each, which is a problem for some parents, and an expense they say the school doesn’t need. But Clay Dillow at PopSci thinks it’ll all come out in the wash: “At $30 per student per year, the system isn’t necessarily cheap. But considering the uptick in attendance (which means more money from the state in many districts) and the inherent increase in accountability and student safety, it may well be worth the cost.”
1984?
Even accounting for privacy, security and the cost, isn’t it “kinda Orwellian that the school wants you to flash your fingerprint before you can learn”? And what does it say about the district schools? As Micheal Trei at DViCE comments, “it seems like a sad commentary if you need to treat students like prisoners to get them to attend.”
But Superintendent Cook has no concerns. “When it’s all said and done, we’re going to find that this is going to be one of the most monumental things that Washington County has ever done,” she says. And parents can always opt out by signing a waiver and having their children check in with a teacher each morning.
What do you think? Is it too “Big Brother” to ask students to scan a finger for attendance, or is this just an example of technology improving an inefficient process?
Sources:
Image: pcstelcom.com
George Kokkinidis of Design Language News is like a modern day tracker, but instead of deciphering spoor in the wilderness, he’s investigating the only fragments that remain from using touch interface: our fingerprints.
Because the primary input method of the iPad is a single piece of multitouch glass, developers have incredible flexibility to design unique user interfaces. It’s hard to appreciate the variety of UIs though, since turning the screen off removes virtually all evidence of them. To spotlight these differences, I looked at the only fragments that remain from using an app: fingerprints.
Link – via
about:blank
A study by biomechanicist (apparently, there’s such a thing) Roland Ennos and Peter Warman of the University of Manchester, UK, has just blown away decades of conventional knowledge: fingerprints do not increase our grip – instead, it reduces it!
Rather than singe the prints off an unlucky student to compare hands with and without prints, Ennos rigged Warman’s fingers to a special device that slides a weighted sheet of Perspex across a finger and measures the resulting frictional force.
Ennos and Warman determined that the amount of friction generated went up as more of the fingerprint was touching the sheet, but not by as much as expected. This indicated that the skin was behaving like rubber, where friction is proportional to the contact area between the two surfaces.
So, if not for increasing grip, then why do we have fingerprints? Scientists think that fingerprints may improve tactile sensitivity, help water wick off fingers, and reduce shear stress.
A 62 year old man from Singapore was detained last year for an unusual condition: he had no fingerprints. The man was taking the drug Xeloda for head and neck cancer. Upon arriving at the airport, he was held for four hours from being unable to produce a fingerprint.
Capecitabine is a common cancer drug, routinely given to patients with head, neck and kidney cancers as well as lymphomas and leukemias. Doctors said very few patients temporarily lose their fingerprints while on Xeloda, but it does happen.
“Most patients will complain they’re having difficulty holding things or sensing things,” said Dr. Otis Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society, who was not linked to the case. “I’ve never had a patient running into a problem with police authorities, but this is not an exaggeration. It could actually happen.”
Unlike most other countries, American immigration officials take two fingerprints from foreign visitors.
From the Upcoming 
ueue, submitted by 
