<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neatorama &#187; evolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/tag/evolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:12:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Are Liberals and Atheists More Evolved?</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/03/05/are-liberals-and-atheists-more-evolved/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/03/05/are-liberals-and-atheists-more-evolved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Satoshi Kanazawa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2010/03/05/are-liberals-and-atheists-more-evolved/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are liberals and atheists smarter and more evolved than conservatives? Yes, according to a new (and, needless to say, controversial) study by psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa:
Kanazawa&#8217;s theory is that intelligence&#8212;particularly our ability for on-the-spot problem solving and reasoning&#8212;arose as an adaptation to deal with the unusual and unexpected, such as a sudden forest fire.
Since disasters like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/images/2010-03/darwin-liberal.jpg" width="150" height="210" class="imageleft">Are liberals and atheists smarter and more evolved than conservatives? Yes, according to a new (and, needless to say, controversial) study by psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Kanazawa&#8217;s theory is that intelligence&#8212;particularly our ability for on-the-spot problem solving and reasoning&#8212;arose as an adaptation to deal with the unusual and unexpected, such as a sudden forest fire.</em></p>
<p><em>Since disasters like that are rare in daily life, responding to them wouldn&#8217;t likely be something our ancestors were hard-wired to &quot;know&quot; how to do. Surviving the fire required both the ability to think up a new behavior, and the willingness to try it out.</em></p>
<p><em>Passed down via genetics, those two traits are still the calling cards of an intelligent brain&#8212;expressed as a tendency toward adopting nontraditional social values and preferences, Kanazawa says in his new study, published in the March 2010 issue of Social Psychology Quarterly.</em></p>
<p><em>As a result of their iconoclastic ancestry, he suggests, people with higher levels of intelligence are more likely to adopt social values and behaviors that are relatively new to human life&#8212;liberalism, atheism, staying up late, and (for men) monogamy, for example.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/03/100303-liberals-atheists-smarter-evolution-evolved/">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/03/05/are-liberals-and-atheists-more-evolved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dinosaurs Are Older Than We Thought</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/03/04/dinosaurs-are-older-than-we-thought/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/03/04/dinosaurs-are-older-than-we-thought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dinosaur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paleontology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=29887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The oldest dinosaur fossil ever found dates back around 230 million years. But the fossils of around a dozen specimens of a new animal called Asilisaurus kongwe, or silesaur, found in Tanzania lead researchers to believe dinosaurs diverged from another evolutionary line around 243 million years ago.
“Back then it was a very large river system, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/misscellania/480silesaur.jpg"></p>
<p>The oldest dinosaur fossil ever found dates back around 230 million years. But the fossils of around a dozen specimens of a new animal called <em>Asilisaurus kongwe</em>, or silesaur, found in Tanzania lead researchers to believe dinosaurs diverged from another evolutionary line around 243 million years ago.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>“Back then it was a very large river system, maybe something like the Mississippi today,” said lead author and University of Texas at Austin paleontologist Sterling Nesbitt. During that time, Africa, South America, Antarctica, Australia and India were all one giant continent called Gondwana.</em></p>
<p><em>Though silesaurs are very closely related to dinosaurs, they lack the open hip-sockets that are universal in dinosaurs. The Asilisaurus was a small, four-legged creatures with a long tail. Their beak-like jaws and leaf-shaped teeth helped the animals eat the soft, fibrous leaves of the primordial palms, ferns and conifers that were prevalent during the Triassic period. That suggests that, while the animal may not have been exclusively vegetarian, a good portion of its diet came from plants, he said.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>The silesaur changes the conventional wisdom that the dinosaur&#8217;s closest relatives were predators. <a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/03/oldest-dinosaur-relative/" target="_blank">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/03/04/dinosaurs-are-older-than-we-thought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The History and Science of the Handshake</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/02/18/the-history-and-science-of-the-handshake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/02/18/the-history-and-science-of-the-handshake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Farrier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everything Else]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handshake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesse Bering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=29573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Scientific American, Jesse Bering writes at length about the cultural origins and significance of the handshake, what controlled experiments have determined about the personalities reflected in different handshakes, and the gesture&#8217;s evolutionary similarities with those of other primates:
In chimpanzees, he points out, dominant apes will oftentimes extend an open hand to distressed subordinates as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4065/4368694683_15267105ed_m.jpg" class="imageleft" width="150" height="99" />In <em>Scientific American</em>, Jesse Bering writes at length about the cultural origins and significance of the handshake, what controlled experiments have determined about the personalities reflected in different handshakes, and the gesture&#8217;s evolutionary similarities with those of other primates:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>In chimpanzees, he points out, dominant apes will oftentimes extend an open hand to distressed subordinates as a sort of calming gesture; and in some chimp communities, individuals will clasp hands overhead as they manually groom each other. In humans, in contrast, it’s most often the subordinate who initiates the handshake, particularly toward dominant people they wish to impress. </em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=limp-wrists-and-tight-fists-what-yo-2010-02-18">Link</a> | Photo: US House of Representatives</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/02/18/the-history-and-science-of-the-handshake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evolution&#039;s First Footprints?</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/01/25/evolutions-first-footprints/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/01/25/evolutions-first-footprints/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[footprint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2010/01/25/evolutions-first-footprints/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Scientists have discovered what may be the world&#8217;s oldest set of footprints. The fossil record may be evidence of a four-legged animal&#8217;s first steps on land 397 million years ago:
Scientists tell the journal Nature that the fossil trackways even retain the impressions left by the &#34;toes&#34; on the animals&#8217; feet.
The team says the find means [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/images/2010-01/world-oldest-footprint.jpg" width="474" height="317"></p>
<p>Scientists have discovered what may be the world&#8217;s oldest set of footprints. The fossil record may be evidence of a four-legged animal&#8217;s first steps on land 397 million years ago:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Scientists tell the journal Nature that the fossil trackways even retain the impressions left by the &quot;toes&quot; on the animals&#8217; feet.</em></p>
<p><em>The team says the find means that land vertebrates appeared millions of years earlier than previously supposed. [...]</em></p>
<p><em>They represent the movements of many animals as they scurried around what would have been a tropical muddy shoreline in the Middle Devonian Period of Earth history.</em></p>
<p><em>Slabs of carbonate rock are dappled with prints that range in size and detail. Some indentations are obscured where successive animals have trampled over the same patch of ground; but others retain exquisite features of the pads and digits that made them. </em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8443879.stm">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/01/25/evolutions-first-footprints/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Humans are Hairless</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/01/20/why-humans-are-hairless/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/01/20/why-humans-are-hairless/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Farrier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=28907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are humans mostly free of body hair, in comparison to other primates?  Losing body hair was an evolutionary advantage in that it allowed early hominids to forage over a greater distance in harsher climates.  In Scientific American, Mariette DiChristina writes:
Our forebears abandoned their easier foraging habits, traveling longer distances through a tropical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4017/4291282304_468c8ba00d_m.jpg" class="imageleft" width="150" height="202" />Why are humans mostly free of body hair, in comparison to other primates?  Losing body hair was an evolutionary advantage in that it allowed early hominids to forage over a greater distance in harsher climates.  In <em>Scientific American</em>, Mariette DiChristina writes:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Our forebears abandoned their easier foraging habits, traveling longer distances through a tropical landscape to acquire sufficient food to survive. Adding meat to their diets meant more calories, but finding prey also took more work. Their activity level increased and with it their need to dissipate body heat to avoid tissue damage. By 1.6 mya, protohumans had long legs for sustained walking and running. Along with that trait came naked skin and a large number of eccrine sweat glands, which produce moisture that removes body heat through evaporative cooling. The hairs on our head also help to combat overheating, by shielding our big brain from direct sun.</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=continuum-of-change">Link</a> | Photo: US Department of Energy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/01/20/why-humans-are-hairless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Evolution of Mr. Potato Head</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/01/06/the-evolution-of-mr-potato-head/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/01/06/the-evolution-of-mr-potato-head/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 07:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mentalfloss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toy & Video Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Lerner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hasbro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mr Potato Head]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=28673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
   
     
      
        The first Mr. Potato Head (1952) - via National 
        Institute of Health 
      1949: A SPUD IS BORN
   [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><table width="510" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10">
  <tr> 
    <td colspan="2" valign="top"> 
      <p align="center"><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/images/2010-01/original-mr-potato-head.jpg" width="500" height="914"><br>
        The first Mr. Potato Head (1952) - via <a href="http://www.nidr.nih.gov/iyf/3745.html">National 
        Institute of Health</a> </p>
      <p><strong>1949: A SPUD IS BORN</strong></p>
      <p>Brooklyn-born toy inventor George Lerner tries to capitalize on kids 
        who like to play with their food. Surprisingly, Lerner's idea of creating 
        face and body parts that can be jabbed into potatoes is a hard sell. Toy 
        companies worry that parents who've just lived through World War II-era 
        food shortages will balk at the thought of wasting perfectly good food.</p>
      <p align="center"><br>
        <object width="480" height="385">
          <param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ICGrjmJouWA&hl=en_US&fs=1&">
          <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
          <param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always">
          <embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ICGrjmJouWA&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
        <br>
        [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICGrjmJouWA">YouTube Clip</a>] 
      </p>
      <p><strong>1952: THE TUBER SPREADS</strong></p>
      <p>Hasbro sees the genius in Lerner's product and agrees to market it, creating 
        the first-ever TV ads for a toy. It turns out that parents have few misgivings 
        about squandering their potatoes; more than 1 million Mr. Potato Heads 
        sell that year alone.</p>
      <p align="center"><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/images/2010-01/mr-mrs-potato-heads.jpg" width="382" height="301"><br>
        Mr and Mrs. Potato Head (1953) - photo via Dnnis Martin's excellent <a href="http://www.mrpotatohead.net/1950/19502.htm">MrPotatoHead.net</a> 
        website (many more photos there) </p>
      <p><strong>1950s: FAMILY MAN</strong></p>
      <p>Mr. Potato Head gets an arranged marriage. In 1953, Hasbro outfits him 
        with an instant family: Mrs. Potato Head, son Spud, and a daughter, Yam. 
        He also gets a car, a boat, and a kitchen in the deal. Within a few years, 
        the likable Spud makes friends with pal Katie the Carrot and Pete the 
        Pepper.</p>
      <p><strong>1964 &amp; 1974: ATTACK OF THE ROTTEN POTATOES</strong></p>
      <p>When parents complain about finding moldy potatoes under their kids' 
        beds, Mr. Potato Head ditches his organic body for a plastic one. Ten 
        years later, new rules about choking hazards compel Hasbro to merge the 
        head and body into one legless lump.</p>
      <p><strong><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/images/2010-01/mr-potato-head-1992.jpg" width="150" height="189" class="imageleft">1980s: 
        A SPOKESSPUD IS BORN</strong></p>
      <p>Mr. Potato Head trades his dapper hat for a green baseball cap and exchanges 
        his loafers for blue tennis shoes. In keeping with his new, sportier look, 
        he also quits smoking in 1987 for the American Cancer Society's Great 
        American Smokeout. To show his support for the anti-smoking campaign, 
        he publicly hands over his signature tobacco pipe to U.S. Surgeon General 
        C. Everett Koop.</p>
      <p><strong>1992: FRIES ON THE SIDE</strong></p>
      <p><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/images/2010-01/mr-potato-head-toystory.jpg" width="150" height="181" class="imageright">Arnold 
        Schwarzenegger and the President's Council on Physical Fitness give him 
        an award for abandoning his couch-potato lifestyle. Curiously, his new 
        healthy habits don't stop Mr. Potato Head from endorsing Burger King, 
        McDonald's, Wendy's, and Hardee's.</p>
      <p><strong>1995: SUPERSIZED</strong></p>
      <p>Mr. Potato Head makes his big-screen debut in <em>Toy Story</em>, the 
        first film ever made using only computer-generated imagery. But perhaps 
        his most prestigious gig is yet to come. In 2000, Mr. Potato Head becomes 
        the official travel ambassador for Rhode Island, &quot;the Birthplace 
        of Fun,&quot; where Hasbro is headquartered.</p></td>
  </tr>
  <tr> 
    <td width="150" valign="top"><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/images/2010-01/mf-jan-feb-2010-magazine.jpg" width="150" height="200"></td>
    <td width="350" valign="top"><p>The article above appeared in the Jan - Feb 
        2010 issue of mental_floss magazine. It is reprinted here with permission.</p>
      <p>Don't forget to feed your brain by <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/magazine/issues/">subscribing to the magazine</a> and visiting <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com">mental_floss</a>' extremely entertaining website and blog today!</p><p align="center"><a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com"><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/img4/mf-logo-310.gif" width="310" height="48" border="0"></a></p></td>
  </tr>
</table></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/01/06/the-evolution-of-mr-potato-head/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evolution Without Genes</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/31/evolution-without-genes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/31/evolution-without-genes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proteins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=28557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most explanations of Darwinian evolution refer to genetic material as the manner in which changes are passed down to one&#8217;s descendants. Now, a study by Jiali Li of the Scripps Institute in Florida finds that prions, the proteins that cause diseases like mad cow disease evolve in response to their environment. Prions have no genes, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="imageleft" src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/misscellania/150prions.jpg" alt="" />Most explanations of Darwinian evolution refer to genetic material as the manner in which changes are passed down to one&#8217;s descendants. Now, a study by Jiali Li of the Scripps Institute in Florida finds that prions, the proteins that cause diseases like mad cow disease evolve in response to their environment. Prions have no genes, no chromosomes, and no DNA or RNA at all!</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Prions are rogue version of a protein called PrP. Like all proteins, they are made up of chains of amino acids that fold into a complex three-dimensional structure. Prions are versions of PrP that have folded incorrectly and this misfolded form, called PrPSc, is social, evangelical and murderous. It converts normal prion proteins into a likeness of its abnormal self, and it rapidly gathers together in large clumps that damage and kill surrounding tissues.</em></p>
<p><em>Li has found that variation can creep into populations of initially identical prions. Their amino acid sequence stays the same but their already abnormal structures become increasingly twisted. These &#8220;mutant&#8221; forms have varying degrees of success in different environments. Some do well in brain tissue; others thrive in other types of cell. In each case, natural selection culls the least successful ones. The survivors pass on their structure to the &#8220;next generation&#8221;, by altering the folds of normal prion proteins. </em></p></blockquote>
<p>Scientists are not ready to classify prions as living things, even though this discovery may lead to some refinements in the definition of life. <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2009/12/evolution_without_genes_-_prions_can_evolve_and_adapt_too.php" target="_blank">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/31/evolution-without-genes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disorders That Make Us Stronger</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/28/disorders-that-make-us-stronger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/28/disorders-that-make-us-stronger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jill Harness</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neatorama Only]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bipolar disorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disorders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[migraines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sickle-cell anemia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=27804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because you Neatorama readers are so smart, you might already know how sickle cell anemia makes someone resistant to malaria. This apparent evolutionary disadvantage has actually survived through the generations because it makes individuals more fit for survival in other ways.
While sickle cell anemia is the best known of these evolutionary diseases, it is not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because you Neatorama readers are so smart, you might already know how sickle cell anemia makes someone resistant to malaria. This apparent evolutionary disadvantage has actually survived through the generations because it makes individuals more fit for survival in other ways.</p>
<p>While sickle cell anemia is the best known of these evolutionary diseases, it is not the only one. Migraines, depression and bipolar disorder are all passed down genetically, and there’s a good reason these traits that seem to be negative haven’t been eradicated through the millenia.</p>
<h3>Migraines</h3>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-27805" title="Migraine Chick" src="http://www.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Migraine-Chick.jpg" alt="Migraine Chick" width="150" height="113" />Migraines don’t just cause majorly painful headaches, they also stimulate the nervous system, making people far more sensitive to light and sound. While this doesn’t really help modern day migraine sufferers, it could help save someone’s life in prehistoric times. Scientists speculate that migraines allowed prehistoric men and women to be one step ahead of their predators and their prey, making them more fit for survival.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Managing-Migraine-Patients-Guide-Successful/dp/0981029817/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1259373096&amp;sr=8-1">Source</a> Image Via <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/migrainechick/2189803492/">Migraine Chick</a> [Flickr]</p>
<h3>Depression</h3>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-27806" title="depression" src="http://www.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/darkwood67.jpg" alt="depression" width="150" height="113" />While between 30 to 50 percent of all people suffer from depression at some point, it doesn’t seem the condition would offer any advantages. Surprisingly, depression actually helps people focus on their problems and then think more clearly about the possible solution to the issues that are bothering them. </p>
<p>Studies show that people who are depressed tend to score better on complex problems in intelligence tests than those who are not. Side effects of depression, such as lack of sexual interest and lack of appetite, can even help prevent distractions from our problem solving abilities.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=depressions-evolutionary">Source</a> Image Via <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/darkwood67/3957083770/">Darkwood67</a> [Flickr]</p>
<h3>Bipolar Disorder</h3>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-27807" title="ventolinmono" src="http://www.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/ventolinmono.jpg" alt="ventolinmono" width="150" height="100" />Bipolar disorder works in a much different manner. When individuals inherit severe bipolar disorders, they can have a hard time concentrating, making sound decisions, feeling comfortable in social situations and organizing their time. But, when someone gets the right combination of the genes that cause bipolar disorder, they can see increased creativity, courage and productivity.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.psycheducation.org/depression/fitness.htm">Source </a>Image Via <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dystopiatv/2936935445/">Ventolinmono</a> [Flickr]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/28/disorders-that-make-us-stronger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Origin of Big</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/25/the-origin-of-big/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/25/the-origin-of-big/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=27753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How did whales manage to grow so big? And is there a limit to how big they can get? Scientists looked at the mechanics of how whales feed, especially those species that consume tiny krill. They call what they discovered &#8220;lunge-feeding&#8221;, which is detailed in an article at Discover Magazine.
In order to make lunge-feeding work, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="imageleft" src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/misscellania/150bluewhale.jpg" alt="" />How did whales manage to grow so big? And is there a limit to how big they can get? Scientists looked at the mechanics of how whales feed, especially those species that consume tiny krill. They call what they discovered &#8220;lunge-feeding&#8221;, which is detailed in an article at Discover Magazine.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>In order to make lunge-feeding work, you have to have a really big mouth to capture enough water in one gulp. But in order to have a big mouth, you need a big body. And in order to keep that big body running, you need to get a lot of food. And in the very act of getting that food–diving deep, lunging open-mouthed, and then pushing a school-bus-sized volume of water forwards–requires a lot of energy on its own.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>This type of feeding might explain the size of whales.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>If the scientists are right, they may have discovered one of the big ironies in evolution. Lunge-feeding may have allowed whales to become the biggest animals ever to roam the planet. But this was not an open-ended invitation.r. Once whales got large enough, lunge feeding itself became so costly it prevented them from getting any bigger.</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/11/24/the-origin-of-big/" target="_blank">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/25/the-origin-of-big/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Humans Evolved to Be Long-Distance Runners</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/27/humans-evolved-to-be-long-distance-runners/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/27/humans-evolved-to-be-long-distance-runners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Farrier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[runner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[running]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tara Parker-Pope]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=27140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tara Parker-Pope writes in The New York Times about the conclusions of some medical researchers that long-distance running is a major evolutionary advantage for humans.  The ability to remain cool by sweating instead of panting and a foot structure ideal for running helped early humans hunt:
Most mammals can sprint faster than humans — having [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2435/4051166065_3a490743e1_m.jpg" class="imageleft" width="150" height="177" />Tara Parker-Pope writes in <em>The New York Times</em> about the conclusions of some medical researchers that long-distance running is a major evolutionary advantage for humans.  The ability to remain cool by sweating instead of panting and a foot structure ideal for running helped early humans hunt:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Most mammals can sprint faster than humans — having four legs gives them the advantage. But when it comes to long distances, humans can outrun almost any animal. Because we cool by sweating rather than panting, we can stay cool at speeds and distances that would overheat other animals. On a hot day, the two scientists wrote, a human could even outrun a horse in a 26.2-mile marathon.</p>
<p>Why would evolution favor the distance runner? The prevailing theory is that endurance running allowed primitive humans to incorporate meat into their diet. They may have watched the sky for scavenging birds and then run long distances to reach a fresh kill and steal the meat from whatever animal was there first. </p>
<p>Other research suggests that before the development of slingshots or bows, early hunters engaged in persistence hunting, chasing an animal for hours until it overheated, making it easy to kill at close range. A 2006 report in the journal Current Anthropology documents persistence hunting among modern hunter-gatherers, including the Bushmen in Africa.[...]</p>
<p>There is other evidence that evolution favored endurance running. A study in The Journal of Experimental Biology last February showed that the short toes of the human foot allowed for more efficient running, compared with longer-toed animals. Increasing toe length as little as 20 percent doubles the mechanical work of the foot. Even the fact that the big toe is straight, rather than to the side, suggests that our feet evolved for running. </em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/27/health/27well.html?_r=1">Link</a> via <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/87419/">Instapundit</a> | Image: U.S. Secret Service</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/27/humans-evolved-to-be-long-distance-runners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Do Women Experience Menopause?</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/13/why-do-women-experience-menopause/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/13/why-do-women-experience-menopause/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grandmother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[menopause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survival]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=26855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there an evolutionary reason for women to undergo menopause? One theory says that it happens so they can survive long enough to be grandmothers. This is not a reward; it is another method of helping one&#8217;s genes to survive and flourish.

The grandmother hypothesis suggests that humans have &#8220;given up&#8221; their reproductive potential in later [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/misscellania/150menopause.jpg" class="imageleft" />Is there an evolutionary reason for women to undergo menopause? One theory says that it happens so they can survive long enough to be grandmothers. This is not a reward; it is another method of helping one&#8217;s genes to survive and flourish.<em><br />
</em></p>
<blockquote><p><em>The grandmother hypothesis suggests that humans have &#8220;given up&#8221; their reproductive potential in later years in order to invest in the children they already have as well as their grandchildren. Naturally, this is an unconscious, biological adaptation that emerges over many generations and is not the result of individual decision-making. For such a hypothesis to be confirmed it would have to be demonstrated that children are significantly more likely to survive when a grandmother is present than when she isn&#8217;t.</em></p>
<p><em>Dr. Lummaa has done just that in her study published in the journal Nature, demonstrating that children are 12% more likely to survive to adulthood when they have a grandmother&#8217;s support than when they don&#8217;t.</em></p></blockquote>
<p><em> </em>Let&#8217;s hear it for grandmas! <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/primatediaries/2009/10/why_do_women_experience_menopa.php" target="_blank">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/13/why-do-women-experience-menopause/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Early Humans Started Walking: Food and Sex</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/01/why-early-humans-started-walking-food-and-sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/01/why-early-humans-started-walking-food-and-sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ardi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ardipithecus ramidus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early human]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owen Lovejoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/01/why-early-humans-started-walking-food-and-sex/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why did early humans walk upright? Owen Lovejoy of Kent State University has an intriguing hypothesis after studying the oldest human skeleton, of the species Ardipithecus ramidus or &#34;Ardi&#34; for short: it&#8217;s all about food and sex!
 In apes&#8212;both modern apes and, presumably, the ancient ancestors of Ardipithecus&#8212;males find mates the good old-fashioned apish way: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/images/2009-10/early-human-ardipithecus-ramidus-ardi.jpg" width="150" height="107" class="imageleft">Why did early humans walk upright? Owen Lovejoy of Kent State University has an intriguing hypothesis after studying the oldest human skeleton, of the species <em>Ardipithecus ramidus</em> or &quot;Ardi&quot; for short: it&#8217;s all about food and sex!</p>
<blockquote><p> <em>In apes&#8212;both modern apes and, presumably, the ancient ancestors of Ardipithecus&#8212;males find mates the good old-fashioned apish way: by fighting with other males for access to fertile females. Success, measured in number of offspring, goes to macho males with big sharp canine teeth who try to mate with as many ovulating females as possible. Sex is best done quickly&#8212;hence those penis bristles, which accelerate ejaculation&#8212;with the advantage to the male with big testicles carrying a heavy load of sperm. Among females, the winners are those who flaunt their fertility with swollen genitals or some other prominent display of ovulation, so those big alpha dudes will take notice and give them a tumble, providing a baby with his big alpha genes.</em></p>
<p><em>Let&#8217;s suppose that some lesser male, with poor little stubby canines, figures out that he can entice a fertile female into mating by bringing her some food. That sometimes happens among living chimpanzees, for instance when a female rewards a male for presenting her with a tasty gift of colobus monkey.</em></p>
<p><em>Among Ardipithecus&#8217;s ancestors, such a strategy could catch on if searching for food required a lot of time and exposure to predators. Males would be far more successful food-providers if they had their hands free to carry home loads of fruits and tubers&#8212;which would favor walking on two legs. Females would come to prefer good, steady providers with smaller canines over the big fierce-toothed ones who left as soon as they spot another fertile female. The results, says Lovejoy, are visible in Ardipithecus, which had small canines even in males and walked upright.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Jamie Shreeve of NGM Blog Central has the story: <a href="http://blogs.ngm.com/blog_central/2009/10/did-early-humans-start-walking-for-sex.html">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/01/why-early-humans-started-walking-food-and-sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ardipithecus</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/01/ardipithecus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/01/ardipithecus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hominid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paleontology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prehistoric]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=26601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fifteen years ago, Berkeley scientist Tim White and a team of researchers from Ethiopia and America found bones of a hominid older than the 3.2 million-year-old Lucy (A. afarensis). The team collected 110 bones, enough to reconstruct the skeletons of what was unveiled today as Ardipithecus ramidus. These bones date from 4.4 million years ago! [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="imageleft" src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/misscellania/150ardipithecus.jpg" alt="" />Fifteen years ago, Berkeley scientist Tim White and a team of researchers from Ethiopia and America found bones of a hominid older than the 3.2 million-year-old Lucy (<em>A. afarensis</em>). The team collected 110 bones, enough to reconstruct the skeletons of what was unveiled today as <em>Ardipithecus ramidus</em>. These bones date from 4.4 million years ago! Carl Zimmer points out several ways that this prehistoric species tells us new things about the development of humans. For example, in some animal species (including apes), male canine teeth are much bigger than the female version. These are the species in which competition for females often turns violent.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>White and his colleagues  found so many teeth of different Ardipithecus individuals that they could compare male and female canines with some confidence. The male teeth turn out to be surprisingly blunted. This result suggests that hominids shifted away from a typical ape social structure early in our ancestry. If this was a result of males forming long-term bonds with females and helping raise young, this shift was able to occur while hominids were still living a very ape-like life. Ardipithecus existed about 2 million years before the oldest evidence of stone tools, suggesting that technology was not the trigger for the evolution of nice hominid guys.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>There have been a couple of hominid bones found that are even older than <em>Ardipithecus</em>, but none with enough fossils to even begin reconstructing a skeleton. <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/10/01/ardipithecus-we-meet-at-last/" target="_blank">Link</a> -via <a href="http://www.metafilter.com/" target="_blank">Metafilter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/01/ardipithecus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mini T. Rex Could Be Missing Link</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/09/19/mini-t-rex-could-be-missing-link/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/09/19/mini-t-rex-could-be-missing-link/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Queuebot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dinosaurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missing Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyrannosaurus Rex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/09/19/mini-t-rex-could-be-missing-link/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
A private owner has donated a fossil that could change the way we think about Tyrannosaurus and their development.
Some scientists believed the T.Rex evolved to its enormous size, then its arms shrank, when they were no longer needed.  The new discovery, though, shows that the tiny-armed killing machine may have evolved from a much smaller [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="imageleft"><img src="http://neatorama.com/upcoming/thumbs/2009/09/18/Mini-TRex-Could-Be-Missing-Link-m.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<p>A private owner has donated a fossil that could change the way we think about Tyrannosaurus and their development.</p>
<p>Some scientists believed the T.Rex evolved to its enormous size, then its arms shrank, when they were no longer needed.  The new discovery, though, shows that the tiny-armed killing machine may have evolved from a much smaller killing-machine-with-tiny-arms.  This totally rearranges the previous T.Rex evolution paradigm.</p>
<blockquote cite="http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/09/17/2072603.aspx?GT1=43001"><p><em>The 125 million-year-old fossil dinosaur, unearthed in China and dubbed Raptorex kriegsteini, is &#8220;as close to the proverbial missing link on a lineage as we might ever get for tyrannosaurs,&#8221; Sereno said.</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/09/17/2072603.aspx?GT1=43001">Link</a></p>
<p>(As a special bonus, check out the religious debate in the comments.)</p>
<p>From the <a href="http://www.neatorama.com/upcoming">Upcoming <img class="middle" src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/img7/NeatoQ.jpg" alt="" align="absmiddle" />ueue</a>, submitted by <img class="avatar avatar-16 photo" src="http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/cff1b130a22b6313d19b0025f73cba32?s=16&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D16&amp;r=G" alt="" width="16" height="16" align="absmiddle" /> <span class="profilelink" title="member since March 6th, 2009 @ 08:36:37">HeartlessMachine</span>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/09/19/mini-t-rex-could-be-missing-link/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why We Blush: An Evolutionary Explanation</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/09/12/why-we-blush-an-evolutionary-explanation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/09/12/why-we-blush-an-evolutionary-explanation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 00:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Farrier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blushing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesse Bering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=26187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jesse Bering writes in Scientific American that blushing may have evolved in the human race as a means of ameliorating conflict.  By reducing the possibility of deception, it encouraged socially constructive behavior among early humans:
Given the possibility of being deceived, it would have been rather foolish of our ancestors to take at face value [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2536/3914155898_b93543c6ef_m.jpg" class="imageleft" width="150" height="113" />Jesse Bering writes in <em>Scientific American</em> that blushing may have evolved in the human race as a means of ameliorating conflict.  By reducing the possibility of deception, it encouraged socially constructive behavior among early humans:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Given the possibility of being deceived, it would have been rather foolish of our ancestors to take at face value a person’s verbal or behavioral expressions of remorse. Instead, over tens of thousands of years, uncontrollable blushing would have evolved as a fairly reliable predictor of the actor’s future behavior. In other words, if the behavior or situation at issue made the person feel so uncomfortable that his or her facial veins dilated—a physiological response that for many people is attended by a somewhat unpleasant tingling sensation—the blusher would probably avoid repeating that behavior in the future. Thus, blushing seems to be an appeasement display. Interestingly, this evolutionary hypothesis is aligned with a recent argument advanced by neuroscientist Mark Changizi in his book The Vision Revolution (BenBella, 2009). Among other things, Changizi claims that our species unusually strong color vision evolved so that we could detect subtle hue changes in other peoples’ skin, thereby deducing their emotions.</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=why-we-blush-social-embarrassment">Link</a></p>
<p>Image by flickr user <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/sanfranannie/">SanFranAnnie</a> used under creative commons license.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/09/12/why-we-blush-an-evolutionary-explanation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside a Dog’s Mind</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/09/11/inside-a-dog%e2%80%99s-mind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/09/11/inside-a-dog%e2%80%99s-mind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=26167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my favorite scientists Carl Zimmer has an extensive article in Time Magazine that looks at recent research on how your dog thinks.
Trying to plumb the canine mind is a favorite pastime of dog owners. &#8220;Everyone feels like an expert on their dog,&#8221; says Alexandra Horowitz, a cognitive scientist at Barnard College and author [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="imageleft" src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/misscellania/150canine.jpg" alt="" />One of my favorite scientists Carl Zimmer has an extensive article in Time Magazine that looks at recent research on how your dog thinks.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Trying to plumb the canine mind is a favorite pastime of dog owners. &#8220;Everyone feels like an expert on their dog,&#8221; says Alexandra Horowitz, a cognitive scientist at Barnard College and author of the new book Inside of a Dog: What Dogs See, Smell, and Know. But scientists had carried out few studies to test those beliefs&#8211;until now.</em><br />
<em></em></p>
<p><em>This fall, [Duke University anthropologist Brian] Hare is opening the Duke Canine Cognition Center, where he is going to test hundreds of dogs brought in by willing owners. Marc Hauser, a cognitive psychologist at Harvard University, recently opened his own such research lab and has 1,000 dogs lined up as subjects. Other facilities are operating in the U.S. and Europe.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>What they’ve found out so far is that dogs can learn over 200 distinctive human words, but they may mean different things to a dog than to humans. And the intelligent, friendly, and obedient behavior we see in dogs evolved because those things are advantageous <em>to the dog</em>, even though we see them as advantageous to us.  <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1921614,00.html " target="_blank">Link</a> -via <a href="http://www.metafilter.com/" target="_blank">Metafilter</a></p>
<p>(image credit: D.L. Anderson)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/09/11/inside-a-dog%e2%80%99s-mind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Did All the Flowers Come From?</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/09/08/where-did-all-the-flowers-come-from/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/09/08/where-did-all-the-flowers-come-from/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 03:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flowers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=26098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charles Darwin was a lifelong fan of flowers, but was unable to figure out how they evolved. There were fossils of flowering plants going back 66-100 million years, which didn’t help much because flowers evolved much earlier. Recently, however, scientists are turning to DNA analysis of contemporary plants to decode where they came from. They [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="imageleft" src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/misscellania/150flowers.jpg" alt="" />Charles Darwin was a lifelong fan of flowers, but was unable to figure out how they evolved. There were fossils of flowering plants going back 66-100 million years, which didn’t help much because flowers evolved much earlier. Recently, however, scientists are turning to DNA analysis of contemporary plants to decode where they came from. They are also finding older fossils than ever before, as far back as 136 million years ago. Paleobotanist James A. Doyle says the fossil record is the only thing that will bring together the many theories of flower evolution.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>If you could travel back to 130 million years ago, you might not be impressed with the earliest flowers. “They didn’t look like they were going anywhere,” Dr. Doyle said.</em></p>
<p><em>Those early flowers were small and rare, living in the shadows of far more successful nonflowering plants. It took many millions of years for flowers to hit their stride. Around 120 million years ago, a new branch of flowers evolved that came to dominate many forests and explode in diversity. That lineage includes 99 percent of all species of flowering plants on Earth today, ranging from magnolias to dandelions to pumpkins. That explosion in diversity also produced the burst of flower fossils that so puzzled Darwin.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Genetic research is providing answers to how plants can switch on genes that control how different plants parts grow, and to use sexual reproduction to increase genetic diversity. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/08/science/08flower.html" target="_blank">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/09/08/where-did-all-the-flowers-come-from/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Can&#039;t Human Babies Walk?</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/09/01/why-cant-human-babies-walk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/09/01/why-cant-human-babies-walk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Farrier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Bock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=25927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In contrast to horses, which can walk within an hour of being born, or newborn baboons, which can cling to their mothers as they swing through the trees, human babies are unusually helpless and vulnerable.  Anthropologist John Bock explains why:
One of the first traits that differentiated humans from our ancestors was upright gait. There [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2629/3879401920_c8abb817a9_m.jpg" class="imageleft" width="150" height="150" />In contrast to horses, which can walk within an hour of being born, or newborn baboons, which can cling to their mothers as they swing through the trees, human babies are unusually helpless and vulnerable.  Anthropologist John Bock explains why:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>One of the first traits that differentiated humans from our ancestors was upright gait. There are several hypotheses about the emergence of this trait, but it seems to have offered a way to move more efficiently in open environments such as the savanna. Although our earliest human ancestors were very apelike in terms of their brains, their upright gait had changed their pelvis to look much like our modern one. This reshaped pelvis came with a narrower birth canal, making childbirth more difficult.</p>
<p>Meanwhile the new roaming grounds afforded advantages in acquiring resources and negotiating social relationships to those with flexible, problem-solving behavior. Over time, natural selection increased brain size in these early humans. But at some point, the selection for bigger and bigger brains collided head-on, so to speak, with the narrow pelvis. If babies’ heads got any bigger, they would get stuck in the birth canal and kill both mother and child. Although natural selection worked to maximize what could be done—for instance, babies’ heads compress as they twist their way around the bones in the pelvis—there simply is not enough room for a big, mature brain to pass through.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Therefore, Bock explains, human baby brains continue to develop substantially after birth and it takes longer for them to learn how to walk.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=human-babies-long-to-walk">Link</a></p>
<p>Image by flickr user <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mackro/">BadrNaseem</a> used under creative commons license</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/09/01/why-cant-human-babies-walk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Do We Cry?</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/08/29/why-do-we-cry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/08/29/why-do-we-cry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 05:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tears]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=25865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Research into the subject of why humans cry (and animals don’t) has produced several theories. Some say it’s to shed harmful chemicals from the body. Others theorize that crying is a holdover from the way infants communicate needs. And some have said that the process just makes us feel better. Now we have a new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/misscellania/150cryingwoman.jpg" class="imageleft" />Research into the subject of why humans cry (and animals don’t) has produced several theories. Some say it’s to shed harmful chemicals from the body. Others theorize that crying is a holdover from the way infants communicate needs. And some have said that the process just makes us feel better. Now we have a new theory.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Crying is a highly evolved behavior,&#8221; said researcher Oren Hasson, an evolutionary biologist at Tel Aviv University in Israel. &#8220;My analysis suggests that by blurring vision, tears lower defenses and reliably function as signals of submission, a cry for help, and even in a mutual display of attachment and as a group display of cohesion.&#8221; </em></p></blockquote>
<p>Crying as a social behavior? What do you think? <a href="http://www.livescience.com/culture/080828-why-we-cry.html">Link</a> -via <a href="http://digg.com/">Digg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/08/29/why-do-we-cry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Evolutionary Origins of Depression</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/08/27/the-evolutionary-origins-of-depression/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/08/27/the-evolutionary-origins-of-depression/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Farrier</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J. Anderson Thompson Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul W. Andrews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=25849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Psychologists Paul W. Andrews and J. Anderson Thompson, Jr. argue that depression may be an evolutionary advantage developed early in human history.  What could be good about depression?
Depressed people often think intensely about their problems. These thoughts are called ruminations; they are persistent and depressed people have difficulty thinking about anything else. Numerous studies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2495/3862912835_87191f7d46_m.jpg" class="imageleft" width="150" height="150" />Psychologists Paul W. Andrews and J. Anderson Thompson, Jr. argue that depression may be an evolutionary advantage developed early in human history.  What could be good about depression?</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Depressed people often think intensely about their problems. These thoughts are called ruminations; they are persistent and depressed people have difficulty thinking about anything else. Numerous studies have also shown that this thinking style is often highly analytical. They dwell on a complex problem, breaking it down into smaller components, which are considered one at a time.</p>
<p>This analytical style of thought, of course, can be very productive. Each component is not as difficult, so the problem becomes more tractable. Indeed, when you are faced with a difficult problem, such as a math problem, feeling depressed is often a useful response that may help you analyze and solve it. For instance, in some of our research, we have found evidence that people who get more depressed while they are working on complex problems in an intelligence test tend to score higher on the test.</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=depressions-evolutionary">Link</a> via <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/">Instapundit</a></p>
<p>Photo credit: Guillermo Perales Gonzalez</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/08/27/the-evolutionary-origins-of-depression/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the Venus Flytrap Evolved</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/07/22/how-the-venus-flytrap-evolved/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/07/22/how-the-venus-flytrap-evolved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carnivorous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=25322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charles Darwin was fascinated with the Venus Flytrap and other carnivorous plants. How did such a thing arise through natural selection? Botanists Don Waller and Thomas Gibson of the University of Wisconsin, Madison believe they have figured it out. The Venus Flytrap descended from an earlier plant that had sticky leaves that acted as flypaper.
First [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/misscellania/150flytrap.jpg" class="imageleft" />Charles Darwin was fascinated with the Venus Flytrap and other carnivorous plants. How did such a thing arise through natural selection? Botanists Don Waller and Thomas Gibson of the University of Wisconsin, Madison believe they have figured it out. The Venus Flytrap descended from an earlier plant that had sticky leaves that acted as flypaper.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>First the ancestral plant must have adapted to move its tentacles and leaves in a particular direction, giving it a greater chance of sticking to and engulfing a passing insect.</p>
<p>Next it sped up how quickly it detected prey and tried to respond.</p>
<p>Then the plant would have had to find a way to become selective, so it only tried to trap live prey and not any detritus that landed upon it.</p>
<p>Finally, it must have evolved its tentacles into sensory hairs and teeth that detect and wrap around prey, respectively, while also losing its sticky glands and growing new digestive glands capable of digesting the victim&#8217;s corpse.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>The adaptations led to the plant&#8217;s ability to eat larger insects for more nutrition. <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/earth/hi/earth_news/newsid_8151000/8151644.stm">Link</a> -via <a href="http://presurfer.blogspot.com/">the Presurfer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/07/22/how-the-venus-flytrap-evolved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the Turtle Got its Shell</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/07/10/how-the-turtle-got-its-shell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/07/10/how-the-turtle-got-its-shell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anatomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turtle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=25058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You only have to look at a turtle once to realize how different they are from other vertebrates. Where did that shell come from?
The shell itself is made from broadened and flattened ribs, fused to parts of the turtle&#8217;s backbone (so that unlike in cartoons, you couldn&#8217;t pull a turtle out of its shell). The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/misscellania/150turtleanatomy.png" class="imageleft" />You only have to look at a turtle once to realize how different they are from other vertebrates. Where did that shell come from?</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The shell itself is made from broadened and flattened ribs, fused to parts of the turtle&#8217;s backbone (so that unlike in cartoons, you couldn&#8217;t pull a turtle out of its shell). The shoulder blades sit underneath this bony case, effectively lying within the turtle&#8217;s ribcage. In all other back-boned animals, whose shoulder blades sit outside their ribs (think of your own back for a start). The turtle&#8217;s torso muscles are even more bizarrely arranged. </em></p></blockquote>
<p>Ed Yong looks at turtle anatomy and how this weird configuration evolved from the basic vertebrate plan. <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2009/07/how_the_turtle_got_its_shell_through_skeletal_shifts_and_mus.php">Link</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/07/10/how-the-turtle-got-its-shell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evolutionary Roots of Laughter</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/08/evolutionary-roots-of-laughter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/08/evolutionary-roots-of-laughter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Queuebot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chimp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laughter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marina Davila Ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/08/evolutionary-roots-of-laughter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Forget DNA! Scientists have re-traced our evolutionary tree and confirmed human&#8217;s relationship to fellow apes through laughter. 
Who says you can&#8217;t learn anything by tickling chimps?
To investigate that, Marina Davila Ross of the University of Portsmouth in England and colleagues carried out a detailed analysis of the sounds evoked by tickling three human babies and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<div class="imageleft"><img src="http://neatorama.com/upcoming/thumbs/2009/06/05/Evolutionary-Roots-Through-Laughter-m.jpg" alt=""/></div>
<p>Forget DNA! Scientists have re-traced our evolutionary tree and confirmed human&#8217;s relationship to fellow apes through laughter. </p>
<p>Who says you can&#8217;t learn anything by tickling chimps?</br></br></p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.azcentral.com/offbeat/articles/2009/06/04/20090604ODDape-laughter0604-ON.html"><p><em>To investigate that, Marina Davila Ross of the University of Portsmouth in England and colleagues carried out a detailed analysis of the sounds evoked by tickling three human babies and 21 orangutans, gorillas, chimps and bonobos.</p>
<p>After measuring 11 traits in the sound from each species, they mapped out how these sounds appeared to be related to each other. The result looked like a family tree. Significantly, that tree matched the way the species themselves are related, the scientists reported online Thursday in the journal Current Biology.</p>
<p>They also concluded that while human laughter sounds much different from the ape versions, its distinctive features could well have arisen from shared ancestral traits.</p>
<p>After measuring 11 traits in the sound from each species, they mapped out how these sounds appeared to be related to each other. The result looked like a family tree. Significantly, that tree matched the way the species themselves are related, the scientists reported online Thursday in the journal Current Biology.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.azcentral.com/offbeat/articles/2009/06/04/20090604ODDape-laughter0604-ON.html">Link</a></p>
<p>From the <a href="http://www.neatorama.com/upcoming">Upcoming <img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/img7/NeatoQ.jpg" class="middle" align="absmiddle"/>ueue</a>, submitted by <img alt='' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/fd95cf45920b94c3685c25e3f6c0d8a3?s=16&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D16&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-16' height='16' width='16'  class="middle" align="absmiddle"/> <span title="member since January 26th, 2009 @ 14:12:42" class="profilelink">Gauldar</span>.</p>
<div style="clear:both"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/08/evolutionary-roots-of-laughter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Seahorses Evolved To Swim Standing Up</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 17:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luciano Beheregaray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Teske]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seagrass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seahorse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Teske and Luciano Beheregaray of Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia, have just solved one of nature&#8217;s most enduring mysteries: how seahorses evolved to swim standing up &#8230;
Seagrasses, which thrive in shallow water, spread rapidly through these newly formed environments. The researchers think that the ancestors of modern seahorses followed.
Horizontally swimming fish living in seagrass [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/images/2009-05/seahorse.jpg" width="150" height="104" class="imageleft">Peter Teske and Luciano Beheregaray of Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia, have just solved one of nature&#8217;s most enduring mysteries: how seahorses evolved to swim standing up &#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Seagrasses, which thrive in shallow water, spread rapidly through these newly formed environments. The researchers think that the ancestors of modern seahorses followed.</em></p>
<p><em>Horizontally swimming fish living in seagrass beds don&#8217;t blend into the environment well and are easily picked off by predators.</em></p>
<p><em>A solution seems to have evolved in seahorse ancestors: the upright body shape, which enables seahorses to seamlessly blend in with surrounding seagrass.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/05/090522-seahorses-stand-up.html">Link</a></p>
<p>(Photo: Robert Sisson / NGS)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/24/how-seahorses-evolved-to-swim-standing-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missing Link Connects Humans With ... Lemurs?!</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/20/missing-link-connects-humans-with-lemurs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/20/missing-link-connects-humans-with-lemurs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 17:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jorn Hurum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missing Link]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/20/missing-link-connects-humans-with-lemurs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Paleontologist Jorn Hurum lead a team of scientists to analyze a 47-million-year-old fossil above (named &#34;Ida&#34;) and came up with this intriguing conclusion: it is a critical missing-link species in the evolution of primates!
The fossil, he says, bridges the evolutionary split between higher primates such as monkeys, apes, and humans and their more distant relatives [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/images/2009-05/missing-link-ida.jpg" width="460" height="407"></p>
<p>Paleontologist Jorn Hurum lead a team of scientists to analyze a 47-million-year-old fossil above (named &quot;Ida&quot;) and came up with this intriguing conclusion: it is a critical missing-link species in the evolution of primates!</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The fossil, he says, bridges the evolutionary split between higher primates such as monkeys, apes, and humans and their more distant relatives such as lemurs.</em></p>
<p><em>&quot;This is the first link to all humans,&quot; Hurum, of the Natural History Museum in Oslo, Norway, said in a statement. Ida represents &quot;the closest thing we can get to a direct ancestor.&quot;</em></p>
<p><em>Ida, properly known as Darwinius masillae, has a unique anatomy. The lemur-like skeleton features primate-like characteristics, including grasping hands, opposable thumbs, clawless digits with nails, and relatively short limbs.</em></p>
<p><em>&quot;This specimen looks like a really early fossil monkey that belongs to the group that includes us,&quot; said Brian Richmond, a biological anthropologist at George Washington University in Washington, D.C., who was not involved in the study. </em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/05/090519-missing-link-found.html">Link</a> | <a href="http://www.revealingthelink.com/">Ida&#8217;s official website</a> &#8211; <em>Thanks Marilyn!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/20/missing-link-connects-humans-with-lemurs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Evolution?</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/19/what-is-evolution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/19/what-is-evolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Queuebot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[species]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/19/what-is-evolution/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Knowledge on evolution fills many books, which can be intimidating to someone just beginning to learn about it. Geeks are Sexy has a post explaining in layman&#8217;s terms how evolution works and the reason why the theory is so important as a tool when examining the world. The basics boil down to four statements:
* Variation, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<div class="imageleft"><img src="http://neatorama.com/upcoming/thumbs/2009/05/19/What-is-Evolution-m.jpg" alt=""/></div>
<p>Knowledge on evolution fills many books, which can be intimidating to someone just beginning to learn about it. Geeks are Sexy has a post explaining in layman&#8217;s terms how evolution works and the reason why the theory is so important as a tool when examining the world. The basics boil down to four statements:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/19/science-is-sexy-what-is-evolution/"><p><em>* Variation, which arises through mutation, exists within and between populations for every trait.<br />
    * More individuals are born into a population than can survive (usually because of the scarcity of resources).<br />
    * Traits are passed down from parents to their offspring.<br />
    * Individuals most fit to survive in their environment generally do (Natural Selection).</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Of course, there&#8217;s a lot more which is easier to absorb once you have the basics. <a href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/19/science-is-sexy-what-is-evolution/">Link</a></p>
<p>From the <a href="http://www.neatorama.com/upcoming">Upcoming <img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/img7/NeatoQ.jpg" class="middle" align="absmiddle"/>ueue</a>, submitted by <img alt='' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/a3fe1c69b7f8242a0d26e758cd4ffba7?s=16&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D16&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-16' height='16' width='16'  class="middle" align="absmiddle"/> <a href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net" title="member since February 4th, 2009 @ 11:08:49" class="profilelink">Geeksaresexy</a>.</p>
<div style="clear:both"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/19/what-is-evolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Snails Are Slow: Survival!</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/16/why-snails-are-slow-survival/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/16/why-snails-are-slow-survival/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 16:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Queuebot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metabolism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paulina Artacho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roberto Nespolo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/16/why-snails-are-slow-survival/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Why are snails so slow? Roberto Nespolo and Paulina Artacho of the Southern University of Chile may have the answer: turns out, evolution favors slower snails because they are more energy efficient.
Testing the biological hypothesis of the “energetic definition of fitness,” which purports that the less energy an animal spends, the more it will have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<div class="imageleft"><img src="http://neatorama.com/upcoming/thumbs/2009/05/12/Snails-need-to-move-slower-to-survive-m.jpg" alt=""/></div>
<p>Why are snails so slow? Roberto Nespolo and Paulina Artacho of the Southern University of Chile may have <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/earth/hi/earth_news/newsid_8043000/8043689.stm">the answer</a>: turns out, evolution favors slower snails because they are more energy efficient.</p>
<blockquote cite="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2009/05/11/for-snails-the-race-to-survive-is-a-race-to-get-slower/"><p><em>Testing the biological hypothesis of the “energetic definition of fitness,” which purports that the less energy an animal spends, the more it will have for survival and reproduction, the researchers measured the size and standard metabolic rate (the amount of energy required for maintenance) of nearly 100 garden snails. After seven months, the researchers found that surviving snails had a metabolic rate 20 percent lower than that of the dead snails—and no correlation between snail size and rate of survival.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2009/05/11/for-snails-the-race-to-survive-is-a-race-to-get-slower/">Link</a></p>
<p>From the <a href="http://www.neatorama.com/upcoming">Upcoming <img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/img7/NeatoQ.jpg" class="middle" align="absmiddle"/>ueue</a>, submitted by <img alt='' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/8d3b6042ebcf66522f4e34ac40f1feee?s=16&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D16&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-16' height='16' width='16'  class="middle" align="absmiddle"/> <span title="member since February 4th, 2009 @ 16:04:18" class="profilelink">philosophile</span>.</p>
<div style="clear:both"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/05/16/why-snails-are-slow-survival/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Devolve Me</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/02/12/devolve-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/02/12/devolve-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everything Else]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[generator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prehistoric]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=22795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Upload a picture, and see yourself turned into an much earlier version of human! From left to right, this is me as an Australopithecus afarensis, Homo habilis, Homo erectus, and Homo heidelbergensis. Oh, and as Homo sapiens, too. Link -via J-Walk Blog
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/misscellania/devolveme.png"></center><br />
Upload a picture, and see yourself turned into an much earlier version of human! From left to right, this is me as an <em>Australopithecus afarensis, Homo habilis, Homo erectus</em>, and <em>Homo heidelbergensis</em>. Oh, and as <em>Homo sapiens</em>, too. <a href="http://www.open.ac.uk/darwin/devolve-me.php">Link</a> -via <a href="http://www.j-walkblog.com/">J-Walk Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/02/12/devolve-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Illustrated Theories of Evoution</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/02/10/10-illustrated-theories-of-evoution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/02/10/10-illustrated-theories-of-evoution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Queuebot</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lego]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Listicle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/02/10/10-illustrated-theories-of-evoution/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Celebrate the 150th anniversary of Darwin&#8217;s Origin of Species with these 10 illustrated butcherings of its iconic cover art, from the evolution of Lego man to the devolution of alternative rockers.
Link
From the Upcoming ueue, submitted by  Andrea.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/misscellania/legoman.jpg"></center><br />
Celebrate the 150th anniversary of Darwin&#8217;s Origin of Species with these 10 illustrated butcherings of its iconic cover art, from the evolution of Lego man to the devolution of alternative rockers.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.listicles.com/2009/02/10-illustrated-versions-of-evolution/">Link</a></p>
<p>From the <a href="http://www.neatorama.com/upcoming">Upcoming <img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/img7/NeatoQ.jpg" class="middle" align="absmiddle"/>ueue</a>, submitted by <img alt='' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/979ea538fb1fe90d8acecac9ab9b34f9?s=16&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D16&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-16' height='16' width='16'  class="middle" align="absmiddle"/> <span title="member since January 29th, 2009 @ 13:09:02" class="profilelink">Andrea</span>.</p>
<div style="clear:both"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/02/10/10-illustrated-theories-of-evoution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists Found New Species of Galapagos Pink Iguana</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/06/scientists-found-new-species-of-galapagos-pink-iguana/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/06/scientists-found-new-species-of-galapagos-pink-iguana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galapagos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pink iguana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[species]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/06/scientists-found-new-species-of-galapagos-pink-iguana/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists have just discovered a new species of iguana that has pink scales and lives on one volcano in the Galapagos Islands:
&#8230; scientists have discovered that the &#34;rosada&#34; &#8211; or pink &#8211; iguana is a species in its own right after comparing its genes with other land iguanas on the Galapagos.
There were also physical differences, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://neatorama.cachefly.net/images/2009-01/pink-iguana.jpg" width="150" height="158" class="imageleft">Scientists have just discovered a new species of iguana that has pink scales and lives on one volcano in the Galapagos Islands:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8230; scientists have discovered that the &quot;rosada&quot; &#8211; or pink &#8211; iguana is a species in its own right after comparing its genes with other land iguanas on the Galapagos.</em></p>
<p><em>There were also physical differences, besides the striking pink and black-striped colouring. Pink iguanas had flat head scales, unlike other land iguanas, and a thick fatty crest on the back of the neck with small conical scales.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/southamerica/galapagos/4126490/Pink-iguana-discovered-on-Galapagos.html">Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/01/06/scientists-found-new-species-of-galapagos-pink-iguana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: 10.14.45.4 @ 2010-03-17 03:41:32 -->