National Newspaper Seeking Stories

A Daily Mail reporter went to a British parenting forum to dig up dirt for a story. Instead, she got schooled. The question:  

I am writing a feature for The Daily Mail about the increase in the number of children being sent to A&E. Figures released earlier this week show an increasing number of youngsters are sent direct to hospital, because GPs are reluctant to treat children. Babies in particular. This means long waits, and inappropriate care. Has your child been sent to A&E with a common infection or minor injury by your GP or NHS Direct? Have you an opinion on this subject, as a parent?

I gathered from reading this that A&E means a hospital. Anyway, the parents at Mumsnet who responded not only advocated sending children to a hospital if there are any doubts about a diagnosis, they also had plenty to say about the Daily Mail in general. Here's a sampling:

Sorry but even the way you have asked your question is skewed to make us think negatively of the NHS. How many lives have GPs saved by sending babies to A&E because they aren’t sure what to do? Happy to wait 6 hours if a little life is saved.

I'd much rather be sent with dd and it turns out to be nothing than a gp think its nothing and it turns out to be something bad. It isn't inappropriate care and no parent would begrudge a long wait to be seen and ensure their childs health.

How does sending a baby to a&e result in 'inappropriate care'???

All these stories of GPs sending babies to A&E and saving their lives. Is that what you are looking for Zoe?

Do your parents know you work for the Daily Mail?

Have you an opinion on this subject, as a parent?
Yes. Please stop bashing the NHS.

Those were only in the first couple of hours. The thread was passed around on Twitter and eventually blew up to over 300 comments. Link -via Not Exactly Rocket Science


Yes, A&E is British for ER. The Daily Mail is the trashiest of "national newspapers" and is sensationalist in the extreme: see video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eBT6OSr1TI
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
The author starts out saying GP's are reluctant to treat children generally. Then further down, it says they're unwilling to diagnosis a complex case when they're not sure what is going on. From broadly sensationalist to more specific... a general practioner in the U.S. would do the same thing. What I wondered was would doctors in each country treat the same for the same reasons - money? Are doctors and hospitals in the UK paid no more than the NHS will allow, and that's all they get?

I thought of another article I read last week online, from Time Magazine and written by Charlie Brill. I found the article very difficult to get through in one sitting, so maybe allow a couple of hours.
http://healthland.time.com/2013/02/20/bitter-pill-why-medical-bills-are-killing-us/
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
  2 replies
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 10 comments




Email This Post to a Friend
"National Newspaper Seeking Stories"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More