<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Toaster Made of 2,500 Pieces of Bread</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2011/06/01/a-toaster-made-of-2500-pieces-of-bread/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/06/01/a-toaster-made-of-2500-pieces-of-bread/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:26:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Larratt</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/06/01/a-toaster-made-of-2500-pieces-of-bread/comment-page-1/#comment-2012163</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Larratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 15:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=47106#comment-2012163</guid>
		<description>I get that they made a 43x71 bitmap which they then cropped down, but it seems a bit more complicated since some of the &quot;pixels&quot; (ie. individual pieces of toast) have more than one color value. For example, the corners are dark AND light, allowing more complex details than that low resolution version might offer by default. I wonder how they did that. If I only saw this picture alone, I&#039;d assume it was faked. I guess they probably scraped the burn off parts of the bread. Is that cheating? Perhaps...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get that they made a 43&#215;71 bitmap which they then cropped down, but it seems a bit more complicated since some of the &#8220;pixels&#8221; (ie. individual pieces of toast) have more than one color value. For example, the corners are dark AND light, allowing more complex details than that low resolution version might offer by default. I wonder how they did that. If I only saw this picture alone, I&#8217;d assume it was faked. I guess they probably scraped the burn off parts of the bread. Is that cheating? Perhaps&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian O'Connell</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2011/06/01/a-toaster-made-of-2500-pieces-of-bread/comment-page-1/#comment-2012148</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian O'Connell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=47106#comment-2012148</guid>
		<description>What happened to the toast once they were finished? I&#039;m guessing that if they opened a window, they would have made a lot of pigeons very happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to the toast once they were finished? I&#8217;m guessing that if they opened a window, they would have made a lot of pigeons very happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Wed, 16 May 2012 12:14:27 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.0644 seconds -->
