Legal Argument: Technically Speaking, the Law Doesn't Require That the Seat Belt Be Attached to the Car



Paul Weigand of Kansas argued with the court that the state statute requiring people to wear seat belts while riding in a car didn't specifically assert that the seat belt (not pictured) had to be attached to the vehicle in question:

An officer ticketed Paul Weigand during a winter traffic stop after making him get out of his car to prove the belt wasn’t connected to the vehicle. Weigand says he is terrified of becoming trapped in a burning vehicle. Plus, he says the law doesn’t specify that the seat belt has to be attached to his vehicle.


The judge disagreed and levied him a fine and court costs.

Link via Lowering the Bar | Photo (unrelated) via Instructables

Commenting is closed.




Email This Post to a Friend

"Legal Argument: Technically Speaking, the Law Doesn't Require That the Seat Belt Be Attached to the Car"


Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window