The End of Kodachrome

By Miss Cellania in History, Photography on Dec 30, 2010 at 7:25 pm

After 75 years, the color film Kodachrome is neither sold nor processed. The last place that developed Kodachrome photographs was Dwayne’s Photo in Parsons, Kansas. Over the past year, photographers from all over the world have brought film to Dwayne’s for developing before it’s too late.

Among the recent visitors was Steve McCurry, a photographer whose work has appeared for decades in National Geographic including his well-known cover portrait, shot in Kodachrome, of a Afghan girl that highlights what he describes as the “sublime quality” of the film. When Kodak stopped producing the film last year, the company gave him the last roll, which he hand-delivered to Parsons. “I wasn’t going to take any chances,” he explained.

At the peak, there were about 25 labs worldwide that processed Kodachrome, but the last Kodak-run facility in the United States closed several years ago, then the one in Japan and then the one in Switzerland. Since then, all that was left has been Dwayne’s Photo. Last year, Kodak stopped producing the chemicals needed to develop the film, providing the business with enough to continue processing through the end of 2010. And last week, right on schedule, the lab opened up the last canister of blue dye.

Today was the final day for Kodachrome processing. So many people wanted the honor of being the last Kodachrome customer that it was decided that the photo shop proprietor Dwayne Steinle himself would shoot the roll of film to be processed last. Link

(Image credit: Steve Hebert for The New York Times)


Email This Post
Tweet This Post 
Share This Post on Facebook

Tags: , ,


Neat stuff from the NeatoShop:


  1. Tipple
    Dec 31st, 2010 at 5:10 am

    Ah, but it lives on in photographic & 3D renderering software. An unbiased renderer(Thea)I use has Kodachrome pre-set CRT channels to mimic the feel of the film perfectly.

  2. samuel
    Dec 31st, 2010 at 7:35 am

    It’s a sad day indeed. Sure I love digital, infact I’ve used digital ever since I got my first (serious) camera. But I think that using film is more fun, presents more of a challenge to the artist… so what will I do? maybe I’ll start to figure out how they make film in the first place and start making my own

  3. XaxiiFan
    Dec 31st, 2010 at 10:43 am

    Oh this is sad. But then this is the price of progress.

  4. vonskippy
    Dec 31st, 2010 at 11:58 am

    If it means just one unlucky neighbor doesn’t have to sit thru another excruciatingly boring slideshow, I’m all for it.

  5. gryt
    Dec 31st, 2010 at 1:00 pm

    Why would anyone be “all for” something as beautiful as Kodachrome being killed off?

    As for sitting through people’s boring vacation photos (if one hangs out with boring people that is), there’s always facebook for that.

  6. JBSpesh
    Dec 31st, 2010 at 4:31 pm

    No Bayer sensor will ever get close to Kchrome rendering no matter how you post process. However if you happen to have a Sigma DSLR you can get surprisingly close with virtually no post processing.


Keep track of the comments with Comment RSS

Don't Miss: New Stuff | Bestsellers | The Cute Store
                   Funny T-Shirts | Zombie Shop

Need a gift? Get unforgettable gifts for:
Geeks | Pranksters | Kids | Hipsters | Shutterbugs

Lijit Search

Old school? Bookmark us! RSS Feed Twitter Facebook Page