<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Non-Math Look at Math Objects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/29/a-non-math-look-at-math-objects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/29/a-non-math-look-at-math-objects/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:48:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/29/a-non-math-look-at-math-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-1980562</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 20:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=34122#comment-1980562</guid>
		<description>Editor: 
Daniel Erdely is in fact the originator of spidrons and some other related forms Here&#039;s his main site: http://spidron.szinhaz.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Editor:<br />
Daniel Erdely is in fact the originator of spidrons and some other related forms Here&#8217;s his main site: <a href="http://spidron.szinhaz.org/" rel="nofollow">http://spidron.szinhaz.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel erdely</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/29/a-non-math-look-at-math-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-1963531</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel erdely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=34122#comment-1963531</guid>
		<description>Dear Editor, I don&#039;t know why did not you mention my name, when you mention spidrons, I was working on it for 30 years and trade marked two years ago. You can see much more on spidrons and the newest development: sphidrons
best regards, Daniel Erdély</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Editor, I don&#8217;t know why did not you mention my name, when you mention spidrons, I was working on it for 30 years and trade marked two years ago. You can see much more on spidrons and the newest development: sphidrons<br />
best regards, Daniel Erdély</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcusbacus</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/29/a-non-math-look-at-math-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-1962948</link>
		<dc:creator>marcusbacus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=34122#comment-1962948</guid>
		<description>The Mandelbulbs seem to be the latest trend lately in the Fractal World, just as the flame fractals and Apophysis were a couple of years ago until they were overused by these people at Deviant and their random renders (now every flame fractal looks the same - boring! With a few exceptions of course). As a Fractint fan... I still didn&#039;t find that much fun in these Mandelbulbs yet. I had more fun with the simulations of Vision of Chaos (the buckets, the ants looking for food leaving trails of pheromones and the fish vs. sharks are amazing), and its &quot;Genetics&quot; sections as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mandelbulbs seem to be the latest trend lately in the Fractal World, just as the flame fractals and Apophysis were a couple of years ago until they were overused by these people at Deviant and their random renders (now every flame fractal looks the same &#8211; boring! With a few exceptions of course). As a Fractint fan&#8230; I still didn&#8217;t find that much fun in these Mandelbulbs yet. I had more fun with the simulations of Vision of Chaos (the buckets, the ants looking for food leaving trails of pheromones and the fish vs. sharks are amazing), and its &#8220;Genetics&#8221; sections as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/29/a-non-math-look-at-math-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-1960610</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=34122#comment-1960610</guid>
		<description>I, too, vote for a sequel to this. And please include the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhabrot&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Buddhabrot&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, vote for a sequel to this. And please include the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhabrot" rel="nofollow">Buddhabrot</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chicomathmom</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/29/a-non-math-look-at-math-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-1960557</link>
		<dc:creator>chicomathmom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=34122#comment-1960557</guid>
		<description>Cool article.  

Btw, &quot;isosceles&quot; just means that at least two sides of the triangle are the same length--the third could be longer, or shorter, or even the same size.  

So, you could have a very wide angle between the two same-length sides (as in your spidron) or 

the angle could be very narrow (think of the top part of a capital A)

or they could all be the same length--every equilateral is also isosceles.  

(But *not* every isosceles triangle is equilateral--just as every square is a rectangle ie, has 4 right angles, but not every rectangle is a square.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool article.  </p>
<p>Btw, &#8220;isosceles&#8221; just means that at least two sides of the triangle are the same length&#8211;the third could be longer, or shorter, or even the same size.  </p>
<p>So, you could have a very wide angle between the two same-length sides (as in your spidron) or </p>
<p>the angle could be very narrow (think of the top part of a capital A)</p>
<p>or they could all be the same length&#8211;every equilateral is also isosceles.  </p>
<p>(But *not* every isosceles triangle is equilateral&#8211;just as every square is a rectangle ie, has 4 right angles, but not every rectangle is a square.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperC142</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/29/a-non-math-look-at-math-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-1960495</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperC142</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=34122#comment-1960495</guid>
		<description>Oh, sorry- I see this has already been discussed (sorry to shoot first).  anony: dennis is correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, sorry- I see this has already been discussed (sorry to shoot first).  anony: dennis is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperC142</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/29/a-non-math-look-at-math-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-1960494</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperC142</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=34122#comment-1960494</guid>
		<description>&quot;...an equilateral triangle has three sides all the same length. An isosceles triangle doesn’t (the hypotenuse is longer)...&quot;

Sorry, that&#039;s not correct, unless the isosceles triangle also just happens to be a RIGHT triangle (the hypotenuse is the side opposite of the right angle).  An isosceles triangle is simply a triangle with two sides of the same length (an equilateral triangle is also an isosceles triangle, incidentally).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;an equilateral triangle has three sides all the same length. An isosceles triangle doesn’t (the hypotenuse is longer)&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry, that&#8217;s not correct, unless the isosceles triangle also just happens to be a RIGHT triangle (the hypotenuse is the side opposite of the right angle).  An isosceles triangle is simply a triangle with two sides of the same length (an equilateral triangle is also an isosceles triangle, incidentally).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anony</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/29/a-non-math-look-at-math-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-1960484</link>
		<dc:creator>anony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=34122#comment-1960484</guid>
		<description>Sorry, dennis, but Miss C and her sources are right. Don&#039;t try and correct things that are already correct!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, dennis, but Miss C and her sources are right. Don&#8217;t try and correct things that are already correct!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmmarkk</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/29/a-non-math-look-at-math-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-1960474</link>
		<dc:creator>mmmarkk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=34122#comment-1960474</guid>
		<description>Just wish a gomboc wasn&#039;t so expensive....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wish a gomboc wasn&#8217;t so expensive&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmmarkk</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/29/a-non-math-look-at-math-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-1960473</link>
		<dc:creator>mmmarkk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=34122#comment-1960473</guid>
		<description>Wow, one of the neatest posts in a while! Please do another!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, one of the neatest posts in a while! Please do another!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Cellania</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/29/a-non-math-look-at-math-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-1960442</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=34122#comment-1960442</guid>
		<description>dennis, you might want to correct the guy who wrote about it at the link under the word spidron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dennis, you might want to correct the guy who wrote about it at the link under the word spidron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/29/a-non-math-look-at-math-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-1960437</link>
		<dc:creator>dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=34122#comment-1960437</guid>
		<description>Only a right triangle has a hypotenuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only a right triangle has a hypotenuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: holly4</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/29/a-non-math-look-at-math-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-1960425</link>
		<dc:creator>holly4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=34122#comment-1960425</guid>
		<description>These are fun! And now I&#039;m better equipped to solve crossword puzzles. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are fun! And now I&#8217;m better equipped to solve crossword puzzles. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fraser</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/29/a-non-math-look-at-math-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-1960422</link>
		<dc:creator>Fraser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=34122#comment-1960422</guid>
		<description>If you watch the embedded youtube video, and then look at the paragraph directly above it, it will appear as if the text is getting smaller.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you watch the embedded youtube video, and then look at the paragraph directly above it, it will appear as if the text is getting smaller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Cellania</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/29/a-non-math-look-at-math-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-1960412</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=34122#comment-1960412</guid>
		<description>Thanks, anony, fixed. I would be very willing to do a second article on these, since there are so many more to explore!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, anony, fixed. I would be very willing to do a second article on these, since there are so many more to explore!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anony</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2010/07/29/a-non-math-look-at-math-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-1960402</link>
		<dc:creator>anony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=34122#comment-1960402</guid>
		<description>Excellent! I love stuff like this. I&#039;m surprised you didn&#039;t include a little bit about the Moebius strip or Klein bottle, though.

In the Mandelbulb paragraph, there&#039;s a &quot;#D&quot; where I think you meant &quot;3D&quot;, but that&#039;s a minor quibble. Great article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent! I love stuff like this. I&#8217;m surprised you didn&#8217;t include a little bit about the Moebius strip or Klein bottle, though.</p>
<p>In the Mandelbulb paragraph, there&#8217;s a &#8220;#D&#8221; where I think you meant &#8220;3D&#8221;, but that&#8217;s a minor quibble. Great article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:13:40 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.1457 seconds -->
