Are Lolcats a Sign of Human Progress?

By John Farrier in Blogs & Internet, Video Clips on Jul 4, 2010 at 6:44 am


(YouTube Link)

Clay Shirky is a tech pundit and a professor of new media at New York University. In this video, he argues that lolcats represent human progress because they are a demonstration of “cognitive surplus” — excess time that people have to be creative. Shirky reasons that the simplistic creative act of making a lolcat is superior to any merely passive interaction with media, and is therefore progressive. Do you agree?

via Fanboy | Official Website


Email This Post
Tweet This Post 
Share This Post on Facebook

Tags: ,


Neat stuff from the NeatoShop:


  1. temp102
    Jul 4th, 2010 at 6:53 am

    Considering the number of articles/blog posts I’ve read about the internet being the main cause of procrastination, distraction and general time
    waste-age, I’m somewhat disinclined to agree.

  2. Vim
    Jul 4th, 2010 at 7:18 am

    Wow, I didn’t know something profound could be taken off of the lolcats phenomenon.

  3. Edward
    Jul 4th, 2010 at 7:45 am

    This is a joke, right? Someone who has a “cognitive surplus” uses it to claim that other people who have it are more evolved than the rest of the population. LOL Cats. Dude, couldn’t you have found a better example?

  4. OK_PC
    Jul 4th, 2010 at 8:36 am

    Any creative output as a form of procastination is better than watching TV. Sure, internet is a huge waste of time, but it is by far in most forms, less mindless than TV.

    I guess that’s his point, right?

  5. Stuart McCracken
    Jul 4th, 2010 at 9:31 am

    I think his point is that “people are making lolcats, and that’s doing something (creation) versus doing nothing (watching TV).” I think what is important is that people are being more creative, and for some people this translates to the creation of novel ideas. Lolcats are not a cause, but a key indicator; and it seems to coincide with this: http://ipwatchdog.com/images/us_patent_applications

  6. swissonian
    Jul 4th, 2010 at 9:57 am

    how would “waste” be defined? what is the right use of time? Why should it be everyones duty to write books, make inventions, paint the next mona lisa in their free time?

    Most people have to work, so procrastination is perfectly valid, and if theres something coming out of it like lolcats or some silly youtube vids for the lulz then so be it, it IS better then the passive zombie like TV society of past decades.

  7. MikeG
    Jul 4th, 2010 at 12:24 pm

    I agree, LOLCATS is/are a sign that society in general is positively progressing because they are a demonstration of “cognitive surplus” — excess time that people have to be creative.

    Having a cognitive surplus can also be boring but then.. LOLCATS.. and the like

  8. sleon
    Jul 4th, 2010 at 1:57 pm

    Ever notice how people who measure what’s creative always sound the same? Kinda like they’re selling something?

    We are not more creative. Lolcats are easier to track than when people do something funny or interesting while the TV is on. It was called hanging out. It’s great.

    Besides “Creative Surplus” is not our problem we need to work on our Obese Surplus.

  9. lucky
    Jul 4th, 2010 at 2:22 pm

    I’m pretty sure that I’ve seen this same speech over a year ago. It was linked on Eric Nakagawa’s blog at the time (the creator of ICHC). I have taken this philosophy to heart. It is better to do something rather than nothing. This philosophy has made my life actively better. This one speech actually changed my life to make me more active, and not just creating lolcats, but to make art and do things in society, such as, as weird as this may be, I participated in the first ICHC art show. It was my first gallery show and it was in San Francisco. Make fun of it all you want, but Clay Shirky makes a good point.

  10. Natey
    Jul 4th, 2010 at 8:09 pm

    Some of you need to understand that he’s using lolcats as an example. It’s a small part of an increasingly broad trend. He’s not saying that someone who makes a lolcat is more “evolved” than someone who doesn’t. However, as this creative and intellectual output becomes more common, we advance as a society.

    More and more people are creating their own websites, posting youtube video projects, and updating their own blogs. The amount of untapped potential for what we do with our spare time is astounding. Sure, some blogs are about mundane daily activities, but others promote physics, art, or history. All of them are better than simply plopping oneself in front of the TV.

    Think about it historically. How do we advance? If 100% of our waking hours are devoted to survival (as they once were), there’s little or no room for invention, science, culture, etc. As our agricultural techniques improved, social stratification followed. Segments of the population became wealthy and no longer needed to spend the entire day working with their hands.

    The sons and daughters of these rich men had ample free time (what he’s calling “cognitive surplus”) to create, to observe, and to ponder the nature of the universe. They were the Aristotles and Michelangelos. They drove humanity forward. That very same cognitive surplus is still at work.

    You might scoff at his use of lolcats in this context, but you’d be missing the point entirely.

  11. ted
    Jul 6th, 2010 at 4:18 am

    Well, I suppose people are showing more naked pictures of themselves on the web. Is that progress?


Keep track of the comments with Comment RSS

Don't Miss: New Stuff | Bestsellers | The Cute Store
                   Funny T-Shirts

Need a gift? Get unforgettable gifts for:
Geeks | Pranksters | Kids | Hipsters | Shutterbugs

Lijit Search

Old school? Bookmark us! RSS Feed Twitter Facebook Page