Floating Wind Farm

By John Farrier in Science & Tech on Apr 28, 2010 at 11:26 am

The Poseidon 37 is a floating wind farm under construction by the Danish company Floating Power Plant. It will generate 40 to 50 gigawatt hours of energy a year. The facility will be about 230 meters long and weigh over 30,000 tons, making it sturdy enough to withstand the roughest seas. The final product will also be able to acquire energy from turbines powered by the ocean’s waves:

Topping a wave system with wind turbines takes out some of the risk. Offshore turbines are a proven, stable technology. Thus, even if the wave generators don’t produce as much energy as planned, at least the investors will see revenue from wind energy. In a sense, this model could be viewed as an offshore wind turbine with wave energy thrown in as a bonus.

The risk is further diminished by the design of the wave power platform. It’s big. The company borrowed heavily from the engineering techniques behind the floating platforms that have been built by the oil industry for years. The platform’s sheer size insulates it from hazards posed by rogue waves and 100-year storms.

Link via Gizmodo | Image: Floating Power Plant


Email This Post
Tweet This Post 
Share This Post on Facebook

Tags: , ,


Neat stuff from the NeatoShop:


  1. Ido Rosenthal
    Apr 28th, 2010 at 12:11 pm

    You don’t see how big it is until you notice the small ship in corner :)

  2. felixthecat
    Apr 28th, 2010 at 1:33 pm

    The vibrations will bother whales and such, and so will be banned.

  3. dutchboy
    Apr 28th, 2010 at 1:50 pm

    Another green mock-up/proposal, come talk to me when we have finished succesfull projects.

  4. Tempscire
    Apr 28th, 2010 at 3:19 pm

    @dutchboy Norway has Hywind, which is only a single turbine rather than a farm, but the idea seems to be pretty sound.

  5. Sue Young
    Apr 28th, 2010 at 5:39 pm

    And if it falls over it won’t foul the Gulf of Mexico.

  6. Robolasse
    Apr 29th, 2010 at 4:58 am

    Of course Nuclear power is much cheaper, safer and cleaner.

  7. HAMesmer
    Apr 29th, 2010 at 12:23 pm

    That’s not a real boat, is it?

  8. ned flanders
    Apr 29th, 2010 at 8:02 pm

    That’s great, but how do you transport the energy gathered by this device to a place that actually needs it when YOU ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE F-ING OCEAN!!???

  9. markoer
    May 4th, 2010 at 11:25 pm

    LOL nuclear power, tell it to Chernobyl victims :-)

    Still you have to dispose of nuclear residuals that will last for thousand years. And it is the worst energy economically as it requires huge costs. It only makes big companies richer so it is very well advertised, but actually oil is overall cleaner and cheaper. Nuclear power is the doom of our society.

  10. beeryce
    Jun 8th, 2010 at 7:02 am

    @ markoer

    Nuclear is not the worst energy economically.. The nuclear material that is everyone imports from Africa has such a long lifetime of use it is actually considered a domestic energy source. In other words, it eventually pays itself back. While the oil is not cheaper, or cleaner. Carbon emissions are produced from oil, while no carbon footprint is produced from nuclear energy. Nuclear power is one of the most powerful and ‘clean’ energies the earth has to offer.


Keep track of the comments with Comment RSS

Don't Miss: New Stuff | Bestsellers | The Cute Store
                   Funny T-Shirts

Need a gift? Get unforgettable gifts for:
Geeks | Pranksters | Kids | Hipsters | Shutterbugs

Lijit Search

Old school? Bookmark us! RSS Feed Twitter Facebook Page