Couple Removed Lawn to Save Water, Got into Hot Water with City Instead

When Angelina and Quan Ha decided that they wanted to save water by removing their front lawn, little did they know that they would invite the wrath of city officials:

The dispute began two years ago, when Quan and Angelina Ha tore out the grass in their frontyard. In drought-plagued Southern California, the couple said, the lush grass had been soaking up tens of thousands of gallons of water -- and hundreds of dollars -- each year.

They said they were trying to do something good for the environment.

"We've got a newborn, so we want to start worrying about her future," said Quan Ha, an information technology manager for Kelley Blue Book.

But city officials told the Has they were violating several city laws that require residents to cover significant portions of their frontyards with live ground cover. On Tuesday, the couple is scheduled to appear in Orange County Superior Court to challenge the city's lawsuit against them.

Soon after the city complained about the yard, the Has placed wood chips on top of the dirt, with help from neighbor Dennis Cleek.

"It's their yard, it's not overgrown with weeds, it's not an eyesore," said Cleek, whose own yard boasts fruit trees. "We should be able to have our yards look the way we want them to."

But city officials determined the fix was not acceptable, saying city codes require that 40% of the yard be landscaped predominantly with live plants.

Link


There's a succulent that grows like pudgy grass, they use it a lot for landscaping in Querétaro, México. It gets crushed if you step on it, though. But it would be great for dry areas so illogically bent on having green lawns.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I'd plant poison ivy. I'm not allergic to it myself, I can roll around in it all day without issue.

But again, I presume they knew the area was subject to such silly codes when they moved in, if not they should have been. I'd never move to an area that told me what I could do with my grass.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I don't think you can plant noxious weeds legally. I have seen people in Arizona paint their rocks green to give an appearance of grass.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Wow, that's a totally BS law.

My plan is to never have a lawn, personally. I'd like to accomplish this by living in an apartment, but living with my boyfriend's family right now means I get to help them garden. I hate dirt. Hate it. And I can't keep plants alive to save my life. Gardens are nice, but I'd much rather my relationship to them involve viewing them from a distance.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Dax - They aren't painting the rocks green to look like grass. They spray green-colored herbicide for weed control which grow very well among rocks. It's a pre-emergent, so they sray it everywhere so that the weeds don't grow anywhere.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
California has never been known for understandable, reasonable laws. I sometimes think the politicians play a game seeing who can pass the stupidest laws. It's ridiculous that environmetally-conscious people can't landscape their yard how they like it.

That being said, there are some simple ways to follow these laws that won't eat-up too much water. There are tons of drought resistant plants that don't need nearly the amount of water a full lawn does.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Tempest in a teapot. The lawsuit has been dropped and the city council has admitted that putting someone in jail for having an ugly front yard is tempting, but cruel.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I think a better idea would have been to use drought resistant plants that grow native to the region. Simply turning your yard into a barren wasteland is kind of tacky.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Unfortunately, I'm all too familiar with Orange. The city is obsessed with its American image and will go to great lengths to preserve it; the council also has no problem treating its residents like trash (just ask anyone who lives near the train tracks.)
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I can understand the municipality's side here. It likely has less to do with appearance and more to do with the fact that vegetation cover prevents erosion. Even the roots of dead grass will prevent soil from getting washed into storm drains or into streams and so forth. Of course, having pesticides and petroleum-based lawn fertilizers going the same way, as they do, isn't a whole lot better.

Mars and Justin have the right idea. Use plants that have evolved to thrive in environments like the one you inhabit and you won't have to go to great lengths just to keep them alive.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 13 comments




Email This Post to a Friend
"Couple Removed Lawn to Save Water, Got into Hot Water with City Instead"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More