The Polygamists

In the February issue, National Geographic magazine takes a in-depth look at the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (FLDS), who still practice plural marriage. Pictured is the family of Joe Jessop, who has five wives, 46 children, and 239 grandchildren.
Members of the faith describe the life that the Jessops and other founding families have built as idyllic, one in which old-fashioned devotion and neighborly cooperation are emphasized and children are raised in a wholesome environment free of television and junk food and social pressures. Critics, on the other hand, see the FLDS as an isolated cult whose members, worn down by rigid social control, display a disturbing fealty to one man, the prophet Warren Jeffs—who has claimed to be God's mouthpiece on Earth.

To spend time in Hildale and Colorado City is to come away with a more nuanced view. That view is revealed gradually, however, due to the insular nature of the community. Many of the oversize homes are tucked behind high walls, both to give children a safe place to play and to shield families from gawking Gentiles, as non-Mormons are known. Most residents avoid contact with strangers. National Geographic was given access to the community only on the approval of the church leadership, in consultation with the imprisoned Warren Jeffs.

Link

(image credit: Stephanie Sinclair)

I've been to Colorado City a few times and talked to one or two of "them" and believe it or not they are human beings.

They inhabit a curious wasteland. Their homes are misshapen plywood monstrosities kept in a constant state of "construction" (for tax purposes, I believe?), and their people look like extras on the set of Little House on the Prairie.

Their way of life has substantial problems. A culture that views the accumulation of wives as a status symbol has a hard time coming up with enough women to satisfy the powerful men. Note the peculiar side effect: though the men appear to be calling all the shots, women are WAY more important for perpetuating the polygamy. Thus many boys are ejected from home and community at the advent of manhood because too many frustrated and unmarried men would have a destabilizing effect

To me, forcing a mother to shun her own flesh and blood just because the community's demographics require it is hellish. I have plenty of polygamists in my family tree and (to my knowledge) none of them were forced to that extremity by the patriarchy. The very thought is appalling. My ancestors' brand of the practice was decidedly different than the curious creation exhibited by these folks.

Also, the only reason these guys are able to accumulate so many wives is through systematic welfare fraud. There's no way the guy in the picture could support 46 kids on his own.

I'll state it as plainly as I can: polygamy is a MILLSTONE for these folks, all of them. A heavy weight of tradition and dogma that has contorted their relationships and souls, shrunk their households even as they multiplied their conquests, and forced them to exploit tax and welfare opportunities.

(And if any sort of welfare reforms cut these people off, I'm guessing they would stop accumulating wives tomorrow.)
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I don't really care what people do with their own time- each to their own, right? But every time I see families like this I can't help but think of the already overpopulated world and cringe.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Note the extreme lack of boys ages 13-25 in the photo.

That's because those young men have been thrown out onto the streets as "Lost Boys".

Seattle was full of these poor boys when i lived there. I'm sure it's the same with Denver and SLC.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
UGH.... I always feel nauseated whenever something like this is brought up.
Just goes to show that people will believe anything.
Be secluded, have a ton of wives, whatever. Just don't pretend that it's more than a bunch of horny nasty men wanting to screw numerous women (and girls).
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"This from the religion that spent MILLIONS to prevent same sex marriage in ANOTHER STATE. Appalling."

1. The LDS Church did not spend "MILLIONS" of its own money. It asked its members to donate.
2. There is no "ANOTHER STATE". 750,000 LDS members live in California.
3. FLDS and LDS are different organizations anyway, so the point is irrelevant.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I don't agree with a culture that pressures people into polygamy, but I think polygamy should be legal for those people who choose it for the right reasons.

I live with my boyfriend (of 10 years) and girlfriend (of 7 years). We would love to be able to get married, but our state does not recognize gay or polygamous marriage.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Postal,
FLDS (polygamists)are NOT Mormons--there is a huge difference. Mormons support marriage between one man and one woman. That's why they do not support gay marriage or polygamy.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"I live with my boyfriend (of 10 years) and girlfriend (of 7 years). We would love to be able to get married, but our state does not recognize gay or polygamous marriage."

Wow, 0 for 2.

I am glad you can live the way it pleases you to live without government interference, even if the government doesn't recognize your relationship.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Well, ghetto men don't have a lot wives, but they do have a lot of baby mamas. They also have about as many kids and grand kids. And the male children are also sent off in their teens. (to the grave, or jail) So what's the problem. At least the Mormons pay their bills.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Sola, I don't know that we can legislate the "for the right reasons" part. A system which will inevitably see abuse needs to be approached carefully, but I don't disagree with you in principle.

Tertium Squid, who said they weren't human beings? Some of us just have deep reservations about what "they" do.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Do they really support their wives through welfare benefits? Just curious.

The 'One Cubic Foot' article in this issue of NG is actually why I bought it (& it's neatoramaworthy): http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2010/02/cubic-foot/wilson-text
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"Do they really support their wives through welfare benefits? Just curious."

I think it's the conventional wisdom, but perhaps my assumptions are not as valid as I thought.

http://www.rickross.com/reference/polygamy/polygamy1078.html

Anecdotally: I remember going to the grocery store in Hilldale ten years ago or so and seeing WIC instructions at the checkout, and the gal in front of me using food stamps or WIC something or other instead of cash.

The question is, do the multiple wives have any benefit from the government not recognizing their marriage? Even though they have husbands, they are accounted as single mothers, when they really don't fit the definition.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Manpace, cash benefits are rare these days. Most government welfare comes in the form of food stamps and Medicaid. The article you linked says that plenty of people in these counties USE these programs, but they don't commit FRAUD by lying about eligibility. Unmarried women who can't work because they have young children are eligible for benefits. That's not fraud, but whether it's RIGHT fuels the argument.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 20 comments




Email This Post to a Friend
"The Polygamists"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More