<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 Years, 10 Best Science Fiction Films</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/14/10-years-10-best-science-fiction-films/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/14/10-years-10-best-science-fiction-films/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:09:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LisaL</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/14/10-years-10-best-science-fiction-films/comment-page-1/#comment-1897907</link>
		<dc:creator>LisaL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=28252#comment-1897907</guid>
		<description>Bleh, don&#039;t see how people can like Children of Men. Maybe it would be better a 2nd time around, but... doubt I&#039;d like it any better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bleh, don&#8217;t see how people can like Children of Men. Maybe it would be better a 2nd time around, but&#8230; doubt I&#8217;d like it any better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/14/10-years-10-best-science-fiction-films/comment-page-1/#comment-1897819</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=28252#comment-1897819</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah I forgot to mention in my original post that Avatar has an 86% rating on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/avatar/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rotten,&lt;/a&gt; and it&#039;s not even out yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah I forgot to mention in my original post that Avatar has an 86% rating on <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/avatar/" rel="nofollow">Rotten,</a> and it&#8217;s not even out yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ted</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/14/10-years-10-best-science-fiction-films/comment-page-1/#comment-1897814</link>
		<dc:creator>ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=28252#comment-1897814</guid>
		<description>I had to scan through the article. It just seemed like so much BS. Minority Report as &quot;startlingly realistic&quot;?

Star Trek shows a future &quot;full of promise&quot;? They killed off an entire planet for the sake of new scripts, and annihilated the future of the original Star Trek franchise.

And fawning like that over Wall-E? I liked the movie, but it wasn&#039;t the Second Coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to scan through the article. It just seemed like so much BS. Minority Report as &#8220;startlingly realistic&#8221;?</p>
<p>Star Trek shows a future &#8220;full of promise&#8221;? They killed off an entire planet for the sake of new scripts, and annihilated the future of the original Star Trek franchise.</p>
<p>And fawning like that over Wall-E? I liked the movie, but it wasn&#8217;t the Second Coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: artbot</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/14/10-years-10-best-science-fiction-films/comment-page-1/#comment-1897810</link>
		<dc:creator>artbot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=28252#comment-1897810</guid>
		<description>This is a pretty dodgy list - some gems, some junk.  C&#039;mon, Serenity was passable space opera, but nothing more.  I liked Donnie Darko, but it&#039;s not even really sci-fi, is it?  At the very least, one of my all time faves is there, Children of Men.  And Wall*E is the most overrated film of the decade.  I love sci-fi, robots, and Pixar movies, but that thing was a giant, preachy bore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a pretty dodgy list &#8211; some gems, some junk.  C&#8217;mon, Serenity was passable space opera, but nothing more.  I liked Donnie Darko, but it&#8217;s not even really sci-fi, is it?  At the very least, one of my all time faves is there, Children of Men.  And Wall*E is the most overrated film of the decade.  I love sci-fi, robots, and Pixar movies, but that thing was a giant, preachy bore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesM</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/14/10-years-10-best-science-fiction-films/comment-page-1/#comment-1897809</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=28252#comment-1897809</guid>
		<description>I would have left Timecrimes off that list. Decent idea, horrible movie. About 1/3rd the way though I had to put it to 3x speed and speed-read the subtitles just to be able to finish the movie.

Stiff, horribly acted and really fooking irrational.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have left Timecrimes off that list. Decent idea, horrible movie. About 1/3rd the way though I had to put it to 3x speed and speed-read the subtitles just to be able to finish the movie.</p>
<p>Stiff, horribly acted and really fooking irrational.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Slapster</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/14/10-years-10-best-science-fiction-films/comment-page-1/#comment-1897787</link>
		<dc:creator>The Slapster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 02:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=28252#comment-1897787</guid>
		<description>You&#039;d put Avatar on the list, &quot;how it looks alone.&quot; eh? Yeah, obnoxiously expensive movies MUST be great! I get the feeling this was a sponsored post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d put Avatar on the list, &#8220;how it looks alone.&#8221; eh? Yeah, obnoxiously expensive movies MUST be great! I get the feeling this was a sponsored post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/14/10-years-10-best-science-fiction-films/comment-page-1/#comment-1897783</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 02:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=28252#comment-1897783</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been wanting to see Moon for a while now, and expected it to be on the list, but I was also expecting to see District 9. Never heard of The Man From Earth.

Anime isn&#039;t for everyone, and even if Whedon ripped it off, he made memorable characters and one beautiful ship, and gave sci-fi a breath of fresh air for a while.  At least Serenity is a better watch than either Terminator 3 or Salvation, which didn&#039;t make the cut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been wanting to see Moon for a while now, and expected it to be on the list, but I was also expecting to see District 9. Never heard of The Man From Earth.</p>
<p>Anime isn&#8217;t for everyone, and even if Whedon ripped it off, he made memorable characters and one beautiful ship, and gave sci-fi a breath of fresh air for a while.  At least Serenity is a better watch than either Terminator 3 or Salvation, which didn&#8217;t make the cut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torley</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/14/10-years-10-best-science-fiction-films/comment-page-1/#comment-1897758</link>
		<dc:creator>Torley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=28252#comment-1897758</guid>
		<description>Delighted to see Moon on there. Such a treat to watch when you&#039;ve dimmed the lights and immerse wholly into what&#039;s unfolding before you. Clint Mansell&#039;s soundtrack complemented the stark, lens-flare-capped visuals magnificently. Overall, an unexpectedly marvelous cinematic experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delighted to see Moon on there. Such a treat to watch when you&#8217;ve dimmed the lights and immerse wholly into what&#8217;s unfolding before you. Clint Mansell&#8217;s soundtrack complemented the stark, lens-flare-capped visuals magnificently. Overall, an unexpectedly marvelous cinematic experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seekshelter</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/14/10-years-10-best-science-fiction-films/comment-page-1/#comment-1897757</link>
		<dc:creator>seekshelter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=28252#comment-1897757</guid>
		<description>nice... im glad im not the only one that noticed firefly was an outlaw star ripoff... joss whedon&#039;s stuff has this weird internet worship thing going that kinda glorifies anything that he does...even if its really not that great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice&#8230; im glad im not the only one that noticed firefly was an outlaw star ripoff&#8230; joss whedon&#8217;s stuff has this weird internet worship thing going that kinda glorifies anything that he does&#8230;even if its really not that great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaz</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/14/10-years-10-best-science-fiction-films/comment-page-1/#comment-1897753</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=28252#comment-1897753</guid>
		<description>Minority Report? Tom Cruise? Seriously? The concept was good, but Cruise ruined everything...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minority Report? Tom Cruise? Seriously? The concept was good, but Cruise ruined everything&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c0ldfish</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/14/10-years-10-best-science-fiction-films/comment-page-1/#comment-1897746</link>
		<dc:creator>c0ldfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=28252#comment-1897746</guid>
		<description>i need to checkout children of men, i&#039;ve heard it&#039;s good (right lisal?)

i hate serenity and firefly tho, can&#039;t understand why people like that tripe. not only is it all totally ripped from the anime outlaw star (i&#039;m always talking about this, lookit up, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Staxringold/Firefly) the production values are not low, but just in very poor taste.  cinematography is dodgey, acting weak, so much hollywood cliche and lame action nonsense. why do people like these?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i need to checkout children of men, i&#8217;ve heard it&#8217;s good (right lisal?)</p>
<p>i hate serenity and firefly tho, can&#8217;t understand why people like that tripe. not only is it all totally ripped from the anime outlaw star (i&#8217;m always talking about this, lookit up, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Staxringold/Firefly" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Staxringold/Firefly</a>) the production values are not low, but just in very poor taste.  cinematography is dodgey, acting weak, so much hollywood cliche and lame action nonsense. why do people like these?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/14/10-years-10-best-science-fiction-films/comment-page-1/#comment-1897728</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=28252#comment-1897728</guid>
		<description>&quot;... a startlingly realistic future where psychics are used to predict murders ...&quot;

Did this statement make anyone else laugh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; a startlingly realistic future where psychics are used to predict murders &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Did this statement make anyone else laugh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seekshelter</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/14/10-years-10-best-science-fiction-films/comment-page-1/#comment-1897716</link>
		<dc:creator>seekshelter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=28252#comment-1897716</guid>
		<description>children of men was an amazing movie and probably more thought provoking in concept than Serenity, which i would have left off along with donnie darko. although i did like darko.... serenity was kinda..ehh.. but then again, i would add something like Ghost in the Shell:innocence...2046 or even Idiocracy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>children of men was an amazing movie and probably more thought provoking in concept than Serenity, which i would have left off along with donnie darko. although i did like darko&#8230;. serenity was kinda..ehh.. but then again, i would add something like Ghost in the Shell:innocence&#8230;2046 or even Idiocracy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LisaL</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/14/10-years-10-best-science-fiction-films/comment-page-1/#comment-1897715</link>
		<dc:creator>LisaL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=28252#comment-1897715</guid>
		<description>*nodnod* I really enjoyed District 9</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*nodnod* I really enjoyed District 9</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gail Pink</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/14/10-years-10-best-science-fiction-films/comment-page-1/#comment-1897710</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail Pink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=28252#comment-1897710</guid>
		<description>I agree enthusiastically with the inclusion of &lt;I&gt;Primer, Time Crimes&lt;/I&gt; and &lt;I&gt;Moon&lt;/I&gt;. One they left off but should have incldued is this year&#039;s breakthrough Sci-fi flim, &lt;I&gt;District 9&lt;/I&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree enthusiastically with the inclusion of <i>Primer, Time Crimes</i> and <i>Moon</i>. One they left off but should have incldued is this year&#8217;s breakthrough Sci-fi flim, <i>District 9</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LisaL</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/12/14/10-years-10-best-science-fiction-films/comment-page-1/#comment-1897708</link>
		<dc:creator>LisaL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/?p=28252#comment-1897708</guid>
		<description>Some of them are ok, but some of them... BLEH.
The Man From Earth was AWFUL. I mean I liked that all it was was a bunch of people talking. It was different, but the reactions/acting of the people just completely ruined the movie.
Children of Men wasn&#039;t very good either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of them are ok, but some of them&#8230; BLEH.<br />
The Man From Earth was AWFUL. I mean I liked that all it was was a bunch of people talking. It was different, but the reactions/acting of the people just completely ruined the movie.<br />
Children of Men wasn&#8217;t very good either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:25:44 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.1445 seconds -->
