<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Progress on Space Elevator Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/16/progress-on-space-elevator-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/16/progress-on-space-elevator-technology/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:41:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Dunbar</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/16/progress-on-space-elevator-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1892986</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Dunbar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/16/progress-on-space-elevator-technology/#comment-1892986</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;While, of course, this is crazy awesome, it would be even better if Lasermotive was seriously working on space elevator technology instead of just using this as a proof of concept for their wireless power transmission technology.&lt;/i&gt;

Wireless power transmission _is_ a key technology for a space elevator.  Also - they very reasonably want to get paid now, instead of 30-40 years from now: focusing on the building blocks makes a lot of business sense.

&lt;i&gt;I shudder with the very thought. &lt;/i&gt;

The real answer is &#039;nobody knows&#039;: we can&#039;t say for certain until we know what material the cable will be made out of.

But simplistically, the bit below the break comes down and in, the bit above goes up and out.  

We know the material for the cable will be light and strong, yet it won&#039;t be able to maintain integrity if it de-orbits: stuff is gonna burn up. The bits that don&#039;t, nearest the ground, will make a mess, but can be reeled back in.

So - messy, but not a disaster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>While, of course, this is crazy awesome, it would be even better if Lasermotive was seriously working on space elevator technology instead of just using this as a proof of concept for their wireless power transmission technology.</i></p>
<p>Wireless power transmission _is_ a key technology for a space elevator.  Also &#8211; they very reasonably want to get paid now, instead of 30-40 years from now: focusing on the building blocks makes a lot of business sense.</p>
<p><i>I shudder with the very thought. </i></p>
<p>The real answer is &#8216;nobody knows&#8217;: we can&#8217;t say for certain until we know what material the cable will be made out of.</p>
<p>But simplistically, the bit below the break comes down and in, the bit above goes up and out.  </p>
<p>We know the material for the cable will be light and strong, yet it won&#8217;t be able to maintain integrity if it de-orbits: stuff is gonna burn up. The bits that don&#8217;t, nearest the ground, will make a mess, but can be reeled back in.</p>
<p>So &#8211; messy, but not a disaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xinavera</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/16/progress-on-space-elevator-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1891224</link>
		<dc:creator>Xinavera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/16/progress-on-space-elevator-technology/#comment-1891224</guid>
		<description>Not low earth orbit at all.  Geosync a full 40,000 km up.  It would take a long, long time at 11 mph, but it&#039;s definitely a start.

In my opinion, skyhooks/pinwheels are a better way to go since they would be substantially smaller and not have to bother with climbing the cable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not low earth orbit at all.  Geosync a full 40,000 km up.  It would take a long, long time at 11 mph, but it&#8217;s definitely a start.</p>
<p>In my opinion, skyhooks/pinwheels are a better way to go since they would be substantially smaller and not have to bother with climbing the cable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arnoldlawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/16/progress-on-space-elevator-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1891091</link>
		<dc:creator>arnoldlawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/16/progress-on-space-elevator-technology/#comment-1891091</guid>
		<description>The thought that came into my mind when i first read this article was what would happen if that cable had to give way? I shudder with the very thought. http://www.cypress.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thought that came into my mind when i first read this article was what would happen if that cable had to give way? I shudder with the very thought. <a href="http://www.cypress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cypress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pwscott</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/16/progress-on-space-elevator-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1891038</link>
		<dc:creator>pwscott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/16/progress-on-space-elevator-technology/#comment-1891038</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been waiting a long time for this to pan out. The tether idea on Star Trek Voyager made this look very plausible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been waiting a long time for this to pan out. The tether idea on Star Trek Voyager made this look very plausible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coalitionforspace</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/16/progress-on-space-elevator-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1890961</link>
		<dc:creator>coalitionforspace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/16/progress-on-space-elevator-technology/#comment-1890961</guid>
		<description>While, of course, this is crazy awesome, it would be even better if Lasermotive was seriously working on space elevator technology instead of just using this as a proof of concept for their wireless power transmission technology.
http://www.spacecoalition.com/blog/index.cfm/2009/11/7/Uplifting-News-Space-Elevator-Winner-Claims-900000-NASA-Cash-Prize

Still, very cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While, of course, this is crazy awesome, it would be even better if Lasermotive was seriously working on space elevator technology instead of just using this as a proof of concept for their wireless power transmission technology.<br />
<a href="http://www.spacecoalition.com/blog/index.cfm/2009/11/7/Uplifting-News-Space-Elevator-Winner-Claims-900000-NASA-Cash-Prize" rel="nofollow">http://www.spacecoalition.com/blog/index.cfm/2009/11/7/Uplifting-News- Space-Elevator-Winner-Claims-900000-NASA-Cash-Prize</a></p>
<p>Still, very cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thatguy</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/16/progress-on-space-elevator-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1890946</link>
		<dc:creator>thatguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/16/progress-on-space-elevator-technology/#comment-1890946</guid>
		<description>just 159 more kilometers to go!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Earth_orbit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just 159 more kilometers to go!</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Earth_orbit" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Earth_orbit</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/16/progress-on-space-elevator-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-1890926</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/11/16/progress-on-space-elevator-technology/#comment-1890926</guid>
		<description>Dean Ellis (RIP) made a great illustration of the concept-
http://www.sci-fi-o-rama.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/high.wire.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dean Ellis (RIP) made a great illustration of the concept-<br />
<a href="http://www.sci-fi-o-rama.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/high.wire.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.sci-fi-o-rama.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/high.wire.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:43:35 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.081 seconds -->
