Comments on: Town-Sized Optical Illusion

By: ted

ted — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:15:00 +0000

Art is for Art’s sake.

It’s not the point that’s in question here; it’s the “why expend the effort on something so inconsequential” that boggles the mind.

By: Shen

Shen — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:54:17 +0000

i didn’t see the illusion mentionned…
painted circle didn;t change a thing, it wasn’t a new thing i guess lol but that must have taken alot of skill to make it appear that way though!!

By: Salesman of the Month

Salesman of the Month — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:01:39 +0000

The art is in convincing all those people to let him to do this, and somebody else to fund it.

For the next installation he’ll make everyone in Geneva walk around carrying a Watermelon on a snowy day. Beautiful effect.

By: Justify

Justify — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:57:55 +0000

@Morgan

Why does it need to have a purpose?

Art for art. It’s that simple.

By: MrPumpernickel

MrPumpernickel — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:33:45 +0000

So tracing and defacing old and rather beautiful buildings is art now? I swear, the word is getting more watered down with every day that passes.

By: Hola

Hola — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:55:55 +0000

Trying too hard to too little effect.

By: Morgan

Morgan — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:44:11 +0000

What’s the purpose of this art?

By: somealien

somealien — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:28:42 +0000

Neat … but why would anyone allow this guy to paint their house with a part of a skewed circle?

By: LisaL

LisaL — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:20:31 +0000

I hope that paint washes off.

By: Wes

Wes — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:52:36 +0000

Which particular angels painted the circles?

By: Gail Pink

Gail Pink — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:25:18 +0000

Cerebral!