For a full-scale test, Adam and Jamie put a layer of clay on a car and did two more sets of runs on their track – one with a smooth clay surface, the other with dimples pressed into it. The respective fuel efficiencies were calculated as 26 and 29 miles per gallon. Although the original myth was invalid, the theory behind it was sound, leading to a final judgment of “Busted, Concept Plausible”.
Discussion threads on several auto forums discussing the Mythbusters episode note that "shark skin" textures on military fighter aircraft (and on America's Cup yachts) serve the same purpose, that dimpling on the undercarriage of some Lexus cars reduces noise (by reducing friction), and that textured paint is banned on professional race cars.
Mythbusters achieved the dimpled effect using modeling clay applied to the surface of a Ford Taurus. It's not clear whether the same effect could be achieved with a ball-peen hammer.
Screencap credit. A brief YouTube video of the car (not the full episode) is here.
Ned: Whatcha diddely-doin', neighbor?
Homer: Aw, putting speed holes in my car. Makes it go faster.
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/aerodynamics/q0215.shtml
They should have used a wind tunnel. But then, I'm sure the manufacturers have done that already.
They did the experiment over the course of one mile and the car was already up to speed at the start of that mile. Meaning that the long term affects of the extra weight were not part of the results. They even stated that the extra weight of the clay would, indeed, eventually cause a negative impact on fuel efficiency and that the cost of fuel to get the car up to speed were equally negative.
However, the point of the experiment was to see if the evenly dimpled surface would have a "golf ball-like affect" and decrease the drag and fuel consumption. Since metal doesn't easily form uniform dimples, they were forced to coat the car in clay and dimple the clay. All of the experiments were carried out on the same course and at the same speed, meaning that the per mile fuel consumption can be compared and a fairly accurate conclusion can be reached.
Specifically, the dimples create drag due to a delayed separation layer, and hence less turbulence behind the ball. (some studies say the turbulence is made smaller, and is thus reduced.)
The reduction of turbulence adds to the distance traveled. (there are other control effects of dimples not relevant to the car application.)
The car only deals with separation at the rear of the roof and the rear of the trunk lid. The rest of the dimples are only causing pure drag.
This is an experiment reserved for the recently divorced with a sports car.
Nice to know my hypothesis had merit though.
i trust MythBusters more than the GOV..
Imaging the Repugs thinks the Public Option bad .
I thinks this should really be researched to save gas
and save the ENV..
Maybe someone could wrap their car in a bubble wrap and try it out?