<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 60 Iconic and Classic Cars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:05:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christophe</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-1874849</link>
		<dc:creator>Christophe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/#comment-1874849</guid>
		<description>No Toyota Corolla, the choice of most of us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Toyota Corolla, the choice of most of us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BamaChris</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-1874607</link>
		<dc:creator>BamaChris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/#comment-1874607</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe the GTO isn&#039;t on there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe the GTO isn&#8217;t on there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mektoub</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-1874490</link>
		<dc:creator>Mektoub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/#comment-1874490</guid>
		<description>Hey no Mclaren, no Saab, no Fiat, no BMW CS3.0 and indeed, no Tucker too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey no Mclaren, no Saab, no Fiat, no BMW CS3.0 and indeed, no Tucker too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ween</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-1874437</link>
		<dc:creator>Ween</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/#comment-1874437</guid>
		<description>Hollywood made many of these cars famous too. If that&#039;s the case, why not put the &#039;69 Lincoln Continental there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hollywood made many of these cars famous too. If that&#8217;s the case, why not put the &#8217;69 Lincoln Continental there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake.w.B</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-1874422</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake.w.B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/#comment-1874422</guid>
		<description>intersting that they chose the 57 Corvette.  The 58 stands out more for that body style, and the 63 was the first without a fixed rear axel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>intersting that they chose the 57 Corvette.  The 58 stands out more for that body style, and the 63 was the first without a fixed rear axel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SWFLguy</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-1874331</link>
		<dc:creator>SWFLguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/#comment-1874331</guid>
		<description>What--no love for the Tucker ?? How could a list of &quot;iconic&quot; cars be missing that one ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8211;no love for the Tucker ?? How could a list of &#8220;iconic&#8221; cars be missing that one ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: budgie98</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-1874253</link>
		<dc:creator>budgie98</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/#comment-1874253</guid>
		<description>The &quot;S&quot; type Jaguar in the pic is in fact an &quot;E&quot; type.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;S&#8221; type Jaguar in the pic is in fact an &#8220;E&#8221; type.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: renderanything</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-1873981</link>
		<dc:creator>renderanything</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 05:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/#comment-1873981</guid>
		<description>Any such list is just a product of those who wrote it and their experiences with automobiles.
A few errors though, one of the most glaring being the photo of a new Ford GT in place of an actual vintage Ford GT40.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any such list is just a product of those who wrote it and their experiences with automobiles.<br />
A few errors though, one of the most glaring being the photo of a new Ford GT in place of an actual vintage Ford GT40.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earl</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-1873876</link>
		<dc:creator>earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/#comment-1873876</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised the 1936 Cord Model 810 convertible coupe didn&#039;t make the list.  See one here:  http://tomstrongman.com/ClassicCars/PaulBryant810/
Cord innovations included front wheel drive and retractable headlights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised the 1936 Cord Model 810 convertible coupe didn&#8217;t make the list.  See one here:  <a href="http://tomstrongman.com/ClassicCars/PaulBryant810/" rel="nofollow">http://tomstrongman.com/ClassicCars/PaulBryant810/</a><br />
Cord innovations included front wheel drive and retractable headlights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/comment-page-1/#comment-1873815</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/20/60-iconic-and-classic-cars/#comment-1873815</guid>
		<description>Cool to see all my favorites on there, and I very much want a Tesla now.  But why were some holdovers from the Ugliest Car list?  Pacer?  Gremlin?  Minivan? Kind of surprising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool to see all my favorites on there, and I very much want a Tesla now.  But why were some holdovers from the Ugliest Car list?  Pacer?  Gremlin?  Minivan? Kind of surprising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:14:51 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.1342 seconds -->
