<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bringing Back Polaroids</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/</link>
	<description>The Neat Side of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:32:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawlrach</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/comment-page-1/#comment-1967061</link>
		<dc:creator>lawlrach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/#comment-1967061</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not that people want instant gratification. I personally LOVE the way polariods look. The focus on the subject is so perfect. The discoloration just adds to the vintage effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not that people want instant gratification. I personally LOVE the way polariods look. The focus on the subject is so perfect. The discoloration just adds to the vintage effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali S.</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/comment-page-1/#comment-1867702</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/#comment-1867702</guid>
		<description>I remember my Dad&#039;s old Polaroid camera.  It was a ton of fun to use and indeed the instant gratification from having in your hand a picture you just took was something that grabbed people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember my Dad&#8217;s old Polaroid camera.  It was a ton of fun to use and indeed the instant gratification from having in your hand a picture you just took was something that grabbed people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mektoub</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/comment-page-1/#comment-1867293</link>
		<dc:creator>Mektoub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/#comment-1867293</guid>
		<description>Hi all,
Indeed, the experience of having instantly a real photo, is not the same as an instant result. 
And despite those sometimes spooky coloring rendering, and the chemicals embedded inside them, I have old polaroids that are aging well. 

They were pricey, yes, but as a result you shot things more carefully.

Until they release again or no the support, you can play with this very convicing soft: 
http://www.poladroid.net/download.html

Free and available for Mac &amp; PC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,<br />
Indeed, the experience of having instantly a real photo, is not the same as an instant result.<br />
And despite those sometimes spooky coloring rendering, and the chemicals embedded inside them, I have old polaroids that are aging well. </p>
<p>They were pricey, yes, but as a result you shot things more carefully.</p>
<p>Until they release again or no the support, you can play with this very convicing soft:<br />
<a href="http://www.poladroid.net/download.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.poladroid.net/download.html</a></p>
<p>Free and available for Mac &amp; PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadMolecule</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/comment-page-1/#comment-1867060</link>
		<dc:creator>MadMolecule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/#comment-1867060</guid>
		<description>@D Bozko:  The experience of having a physical, tactile photo in your hand as soon as you take the picture is different, and some prefer it.  I like it a lot myself, though not enough to pay $2/shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@D Bozko:  The experience of having a physical, tactile photo in your hand as soon as you take the picture is different, and some prefer it.  I like it a lot myself, though not enough to pay $2/shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D Bozko</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/comment-page-1/#comment-1866890</link>
		<dc:creator>D Bozko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 11:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/#comment-1866890</guid>
		<description>Why?  The idea behind instant photography is instant gratification.  Don&#039;t we get that from digital now? Besides an instant picture is a done deal while digital has infinite possibilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why?  The idea behind instant photography is instant gratification.  Don&#8217;t we get that from digital now? Besides an instant picture is a done deal while digital has infinite possibilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Giachetti</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/comment-page-1/#comment-1866859</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Giachetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 08:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/#comment-1866859</guid>
		<description>This is not good news for the Polish.

Poli  roids</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not good news for the Polish.</p>
<p>Poli  roids</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chonepup</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/comment-page-1/#comment-1866844</link>
		<dc:creator>chonepup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/#comment-1866844</guid>
		<description>These are going to be very expensive. $2+ per picture and they are already admitting the color is going to be &quot;off&quot;. Interestingly Polaroid has commented that they are looking into and planning on bringing back polaroid film themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are going to be very expensive. $2+ per picture and they are already admitting the color is going to be &#8220;off&#8221;. Interestingly Polaroid has commented that they are looking into and planning on bringing back polaroid film themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SlappyMcDoodle</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/comment-page-1/#comment-1866814</link>
		<dc:creator>SlappyMcDoodle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 04:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/#comment-1866814</guid>
		<description>Fuji makes a lot better (in my opinion) large format instant film. I wish they would make a 600 type film for the later model polaroid cameras.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuji makes a lot better (in my opinion) large format instant film. I wish they would make a 600 type film for the later model polaroid cameras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lansing wedding photographer</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/comment-page-1/#comment-1866771</link>
		<dc:creator>lansing wedding photographer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 01:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/#comment-1866771</guid>
		<description>yep, the Fuji is a good alternative, though I&#039;d rather see the real Polaroid come back</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep, the Fuji is a good alternative, though I&#8217;d rather see the real Polaroid come back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mustardhamsters</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/comment-page-1/#comment-1866728</link>
		<dc:creator>mustardhamsters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/#comment-1866728</guid>
		<description>Bring back daguerreotypes! They beat the pants off of high ISO film!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring back daguerreotypes! They beat the pants off of high ISO film!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adamr</title>
		<link>http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/comment-page-1/#comment-1866725</link>
		<dc:creator>adamr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neatorama.com/2009/10/05/bringing-back-polaroids/#comment-1866725</guid>
		<description>Check out the Fuji Instax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the Fuji Instax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page Cached by VaroCMS @ Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:16:04 +0000 --><!-- page generated in 0.0946 seconds -->
