NEATORAMA HOME | LITE/MOBILE VERSION | BEST OF NEATORAMA

Scientists Discover Magnets That Have Only One Pole

By John Farrier in Science & Tech on Sep 5, 2009 at 8:46 pm


Scientists have long speculated about the existence of magnetic materials that have only one pole, instead of both negative and postive poles. Even our resident mad scientist has written about the subject. But now, Claudio Castelnovo of the University of Oxford thinks that his team has found evidence of the existence of these monopoles in certain rare-materials known as “spin ices”:

At low temperatures, there is still some magnetic wiggle room in the spin ice’s lattice structure, but not a lot—the magnetic freedom of the system is frustrated, so to speak. “As a result, this is a substance that has degrees of freedom that look the same, microscopically, as you would see in a fridge magnet,” Castelnovo says. “But a fridge magnet is able to order so as to act as a fridge magnet and stick to metals, while this one is not able to achieve this level of ordering in spite of having this magnetic structure inside, because of this frustration.”

Internally, the tiny magnetic components arrange themselves head to tail in strings, like chains of bar magnets stretching across a table in different directions. In a very cold, clean sample, those strings form closed loops. But excitation induced by a rise in temperature can introduce tiny defects in these chains, Castelnovo says—in the bar-magnet analogue, one of the magnets is flipped, breaking the head-to-tail continuity. “You have your path that is north–south–north–south, and at a certain point one of the needles actually twists 180 degrees and points the wrong way,” he explains.

On either side of that defect, all of a sudden, is a concentration of magnetic charge—two norths at one end, two souths at the other. Those concentrations can float free along the string, acting as—voilà—magnetic monopoles.

Link

Image by flickr user Stinging Eyes used under creative commons license


Share

Tags: , , ,


COMMENT
  1. Johnny Cat
    Sep 5th, 2009 at 10:56 pm

    (raises hand) Can I be excused?

  2. Edward
    Sep 5th, 2009 at 11:35 pm

    If the poles can't leave the string, isn't this still a dipole?

  3. Gauldar
    Sep 5th, 2009 at 11:41 pm

    MOBIUS MAGNET!

  4. Lady Helena Handbasket
    Sep 6th, 2009 at 10:22 am

    I didn't understand a word of that

  5. Lv
    Sep 6th, 2009 at 11:02 am

    "It's an effective excitation that at some level looks like a monopole, but it's not really fundamentally a monopole." Read the article.

  6. clinton robert labombard
    Sep 6th, 2009 at 11:55 am

    Soooo... the hunt goes on for actual news.

  7. oScar Z
    Sep 6th, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    Monopoles, frustration? This article is about masturbation right

  8. Skipweasel
    Sep 6th, 2009 at 3:02 pm

    The letters page in New Scientist a few weeks ago said much the same - it's /like/ a monopole - but not.

  9. Alex
    Sep 7th, 2009 at 1:20 pm

    Very interesting article, John - great find!

PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT

Neatorama Comment Policy
You don't have to register or login to comment, but it's easier if you do so. Comments aren't censored, but those that are abusive or off-topic may be edited or deleted.


Keep track of the comments with Comment RSS

Lijit Search

T-SHIRTS FROM THE NEATORAMA SHOP

WRITE YOUR OWN NEATORAMA POST
Got a neat story? Share it with the world by writing your very own Neatorama blog post with the Upcoming Queue. Who knows, you might just win something ...

Here's how to get started:
FAQ | Tips