Movie Trivia: Charlie and the Chocolate Factory

Johnny Depp is everywhere lately, isn't he? Public Enemies is in theaters now, the trailer for Alice in Wonderland was just released, and now it's been announced that he is going to be starring in Dark Shadows. I love Johnny Depp (and Tim Burton), so I'm thrilled about all of this. In fact, it made me want to revisit another one of their collaborations.

Check out the costumes the kids are wearing during Willy's Halloween flashback - three of them are wearing costumes that look like Lock, Shock, and Barrel, Oogie Boogie's evil helpers in A Nightmare Before Christmas. You have to look quick though - they run by at the very beginning of the scene from the left side of the screen to the right side of the screen. When the gang is riding down the chocolate river just after they see the "Whipped Cream" room, they pass a room labeled "Jelly Beans." If you pause it and go into slo-mo, you'll see that the next room is labeled "Beetle Juicing."

If you love bad puns, you'll love this one - you probably remember the scene where the group is touring the factory and they make a brief stop at the secretary, who is also an Oompa Loompa played by Deep Roy. The title plaque on her desk says "Taste Accountant." It's a silly little reference to the phrase, "There's no accounting for taste." Apparently, there is! In the edible meadow scene, the tube that vacuums the chocolate up from the lake is stuck into a flying saucer-looking thing, which is because it is. It's actually one of the saucers from Burton's Mars Attacks. People who were considered for the role of Willy Wonka: Nicolas Cage, Jim Carrey, John Cleese, Robert DeNiro (can you imagine?!), Michael Keaton, Marilyn Manson, Leslie Nielsen, Bill Murray, Mike Myers, Brad Pitt, Christopher Walken, Patrick Stewart, Ben Stiller, Will Smith and Robin Williams. A bunch of famous T.V. dads were considered for the role of Mike Teavee's dad - Dan Castellaneta (Homer Simpson), Tim Allen (Tim Taylor), Ed O'Neill (Al Bundy), Bob Saget (Danny Tanner), and Ray Romano (Ray Barone), among others.

Some of the other buttons in the Glass Elevator: Fragile Egos, Spewed Vegetables, Root Beer Googles, Nice Plums, Secretarial Poodles. Heart-Shaped Lungs, People Poo and Blackberry Sausages. When Willy and the kids are checking out all of Wonka's various candy-making rooms, they pass one with a bunch of pink sheep. "I don't want to talk about it," Wonka remarks. This is a reference to Ed Wood, another Burton and Depp collaboration - real-life director Ed Wood had a thing for wearing pink angora sweaters. The actress who plated Grandma Georgina said she had her pick of which grandma to play. After reading the whole script, she picked Grandma Georgina because she's the one who gets to kiss Johnny Depp. I like the way that lady thinks. Willy Wonka's cane is filled with Nerds candy. The little boy who played Augustus Gloop wore a fat suit for the role. A bunch of people saw the similarities between Willy Wonka and Michael Jackson after the movie came out. Tim Burton begged to differ. "Michael Jackson likes children; Willy Wonka can't stand them. To me that's a huge difference." Depp agreed and said that his inspiration was somewhere between Howard Hughes in his later years and Mr. Rogers. Martin Scorsese almost directed the film, but ended up doing The Aviator instead. Mr. Bucket works for a company that makes Smilex toothpaste, which you can see early on when it shows a shot of him taking the misshapen toothpaste caps from the assembly line. "Smylex" is also the name of the poison the Joker releases on the city in the Burton-directed Batman.

The squirrels in the Nut Room scene are real - at least, 40 of them are. The animals were trained every day for nearly three months so that the close shots in that scene would look realistic. It also provided reality for the kids instead of forcing them to work with a green screen and CGI. Johnny Depp ad-libbed the line where he's talking to Mike Teavee about the types of people who would want to have long hair and slips into jive talk. To be exact, it's "It's in the fridge, daddy-o! Are you hip to the jive? Can you dig what I'm layin' down? I knew that you could. Slide me some skin, soul brother!" The first time he did it, the actor who plays Mike looked at him like he was nuts and said, "That's not in the script." Deep Roy is the one who suggested that the Augustus Gloop dance scene be like a big Bollywood musical scene. The chocolate river was originally going to be CGI, but they tried that and Burton didn't like the way it looked. So after testing nine different chocolates for their color, 192,000 gallons of it were used to make a real chocolate river. It looks great, sure, but apparently after a couple of weeks it started to smell quite bad. Johnny Depp tested out Wonka's slightly lispy, aloof voice on his daughter while they were playing Barbies. She liked it, so he went with it. What do you like better - this version or Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, the Gene Wilder version? Have a movie suggestion, or just want to read my babble? I'm on Twitter.


this one was much better. it kept to the book much more than the cheesy gene wilder one, aside from the wonkas dad sub plot of course.

also, to SenorMysterioso, this was not a remake of the gene wilder film, it was an adaptation of the original book. check out the book and you will see how awful gene wilder played wonka. not the depp was perfect, but he was MUCH closer to how he was in the book.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I thought I'd seen everything, but now I see that there are people who actually like this piece of junk movie! They should have just gotten Emo Phillips to play Willy Wonka, JD does a pretty good imitation...
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I like the original but only because all the remakes are "remakes". There's no need to be remaking films whatsoever. I was happy to read about this movie trivia, very cool info. Also, when is the next music trivia coming out??? Just curious. Any chance for a Devo trivia???
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
hahah..emo phillips would have been awesome...however, i did watch that stupid Epic Movie or whatever that parody one was...and it had Crispin Glover as wonka... while it was as stupid movie, hes just naturally creepy and fit so perfectly in that role..
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I've never read the book, so if the question is which one is a better adaptation, I'll have to pass. As far as movies go, I always watch the original when it's on television. I never was able to get all the way through the remake.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
the new version is absolute crap. even if it was more like the book, depp killed willy wonka, and i love depp! the whole time i was watching the new one the lines from the original were playing in my head and it killed me to hear the new cast reference the old. im a fan of cgi but this was a nightmare. they tried way to hard to say 'hey look what we can do with computers!' it was almost an insult to the original where everything was 'real'. its what made the original so good!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"In the edible meadow scene, the tube that vacuums the chocolate up from the lake is stuck into a flying saucer-looking thing, which is because it is."

That's perhaps the oddest sentence I've ever read.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Gene Wilder all the way, this one has its merits, yes, like any good re-make, but the original was brilliant, it really didn't need to be redone. And as brilliant as Depp is,...he ain't no Wilder.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Definitely the new one. I always hated the Wilder version because it was so far away from the book, which was my favourite as a kid. Depp is just how I always imagined Wonka. The only bit I don't like in the newer one are the Oompa Loompas.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Nikki, how did you not like the oompa loompas? they were exactly as described in the book, although i am sure Dahl never imagined them singing disco or pseudo metal...

also, to everyone else...

IT IS NOT A REMAKE!! It is a new adaptation of an old book, they were not remaking the wilder film, thus is NOT a remake.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Gene Wilder, no contest. And don't get me started on the CGI-reproduced Oompa Loompas. Ugh.

Apparently Fred Astaire was considered for the role at one point. He would have been an interesting choice, but it would have been an entirely different movie: sweet rather than twisted, which is what Wilder gave it. I read somewhere that Wilder accepted the role on the condition that he could do that fake fall at his introduction, after limping up to the gate on his cane.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Both movies have their qualities. My only regret is that Burton couldn't have directed the earlier version. Of course I think the earlier Oompas were much better due to the fact that they looked to be a race of people instead of a cloned hive. Diversity is always a key to good entertainment.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I loved the books, and I still LOVE the Wilder version. I don't care that Roald Dahl didn't like it, it stands on it's own as a great film. I adored as a food junkie child and even now I get the urge to watch every few years. The new one just couldn't live up to it for me. I didn't like the CGI oompa loompas, either, and frankly I've forgotten everything else about it besides Depp's costume. I get that Burton's vision is different, and closer to the book. It's interesting to see his take, but there's no contest for me. I think a lot of people felt that way. I just can't evaluate it on its own merits. I AM looking forward to Alice in Wonderland, though. There are so many versions already that I'm not faithful to one.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I like both equally. The Gene Wilder one cannot be compared properly to the Johnny Depp one because they both channeled a different facet of Willy Wonka. Gene channeled the quirky, mischievous Wonka and Depp the quirky, slightly creepy, but no-less-endearing Wonka. I like how the newest adaptation kept to the heart of the story told in the book.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Wilder one is great - a classic, although it gave me nightmares and scared me as a kid.

The Depp version, I prefer it's humor more. The oompa loompas aren't as scary either.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I like the way that woman thinks, too! I definitely prefer the Depp one, even though I do like me some Wilder... even Wilder said that Depp's perfomance as Willy Wonka eclipsed his own. "That's not in the script." LOL That's hilarious! That line Depp says might be my favorite in the whole movie!

I don't want to talk about it. XD
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Gene wilder one, its a classic, new one freaked me out, I like Depp but not in that role, I like wilder's ability to be sane and yet insane, while Depp just portrayed the insane to me, I can't say about the book, I don't remember reading it.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
You know, the "ad-lib" jive talk:

“It’s in the fridge, daddy-o! Are you hip to the jive? Can you dig what I’m layin’ down? I knew that you could. Slide me some skin, soul brother!”

seems to be an homage to Gene Wilder. He said those lines in Silver Streak, when he was trying to disguise himself as a black man with Richard Pryor's help.

That's pretty sweet.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I love love love Johnny Depp, and everything he's done with Tim Burton has been classic, but this movie was the worst piece of crap I've ever seen. I love the original, and I expected this to be really good, but I was sooooo disappointed. I was most upset by the fact that he didn't do the tunnel scene. I was hoping he would make it really dark and disturbing and he just took it out completely.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I'm so glad I read through all these comments to find the bit of trivia about The Silver Streak! So sweet. Willie Wonka and the Chocolate Factory will ALWAYS be my favorite movie, but the new one was aight, too.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
i love them both, but really they're two totally different movies-different takes on the same book.

and i don't care how many movies they make- tim burton and johnny depp are always awesome!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I'll have to go with the original/wilder one. Even though I read the book (as well as the Great Glass Elevator 'sequal'), I still like Wilder's version better.

And to be honest, with Burton and Depp, I was expecting this version to be MORE creepy and psychotic and unnerving than Wilder's version (in subtext at least), and it was less so.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"The old one isn't like the book!"

Wah-wah-wah. Coming from someone who's read the book and loved it as a child, I prefer the way the original translates the spirit if not the letter of Dahl's genius. Those who think that good adaptations are literal adaptations doesn't understand the difference between books and film.

It's all about the heart, and Wolper's version has that in spades. It's also far more menacing in a much more subversive way, which preserves Dahl's intent in a completely different and completely complementary way.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"The original scared me as a kid and still gives me the creeps to this day, i like the Depp version much better"

THIS is what makes the original a better film. Dahl is meant to scare you.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
The Gene Wilder film is my favorite of the two. His Willy Wonka is more menacing, and was completely unpredictable.
When I first saw the Tim Burton version, I hated it. However, I've grown more fond of it over time, and now I can appreciate it as its own film.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
The Gene Wilder version was so much better. Even with Tim Burton attached, the remake was still sanitized for the kiddies' protection -- unlike the original.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Um, the original film had Roald Dahl as a screenwriter, all the stuff about the competitors, "My dear boy", a non-pathological Wonka (liking or not liking isn't the point). The one had a few nice production elements, and kept all the morality poems about vice and virtue, but is still deeply flawed.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Remake. Let's get that remake out of the way, first. Remake, remake, remake. Just like a musical version of "Hairspray" is a remake of the classic John Water's film, "CATCF" is a remake of my very first favorite movie, "WWATCF". And, it stunk for every single reason mentioned here.

Deep Roy just skeeved me. Depp disappointed. I fell asleep watching the remake, TWICE.

I remember reading a blurb in a magazine about the then PLANNED "remakes" (quotes because that's what it stated in the article)of Wonka, and, another favorite movie of mine, "Rock 'n' Roll High School", and really wanting to see both. I now thank the studio powers that be that the remake of "R'n'RHS" hasn't happened. Who would/could replace The Ramones in a remake? Maybe the Beastie Boys.

Which reminds me... both the Ramones AND "Rock 'n' Roll High School" would make for excellent Trivia topics.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
"It’s all about the heart, and Wolper’s version has that in spades. It’s also far more menacing in a much more subversive way, which preserves Dahl’s intent in a completely different and completely complementary way."

+1

NO ONE HAS MENTIONED THE SONGS! I'm a huge Elfman fan, but those songs were un-likeable, un-rememberable, had no heart, no humor, simply AWFUL.

The new vs. old Oompa-loompas argument is a wash. BOTH versions are creepy.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Definitely the original one. Johnny Depp as Willy Wonka just gives me the creeps.

BTW is there really only one Johnny Depp? I find it very hard to believe that this is the same guy as the one who played Jack Sparrow in the Pirates of the Carribean. In every role, he looks to be some other guy, also very different from the guy with glasses that he always shows up as, in real life.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Whether or not you consider it a remake of the 1971 film, there's really no comparison. The first film is far and away superior. Burton hasn't made a good film since 'Ed Wood,' and the fact that he's gone away from making his own original material just proves that his creative well is dry.

I love Johnny Depp, but his performance here is atrocious. Gene Wilder inhabited the role perfectly, with just the right balance of screwball comedy and barely-contained menace. Depp doesn't even come close to finding those notes.

And for those who complain that the 1971 film deviates too far from the book, well, the screenplay was written by none other than Mr. Roald Dahl himself, so apparently the author though that the novel as written needed some modification if it was to translate to the screen well. Judging by these two films, it's hard to argue with that.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
LONG LIVE THE ORIGINAL

Every time I see the original on TV, I am compelled to watch it to the end. The new remake? Meh! Had to force myself to watch it once.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I love people assume that since the author's name is in the credits as a writer that doesn't mean that studio tampering didn't completely overhaul the script they wrote. happened with Dahl on this film and Nabokov on Lolita.

"Roald Dahl was reportedly so angry with the treatment of his book (mainly stemming from the massive rewrite by David Seltzer) that he refused permission for the book's sequel, "Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator", to be filmed. Seltzer had an idea for a new sequel, but legal issues meant that it never got off the ground."

"Stories concerning author Roald Dahl's immense dissatisfaction with this film are legendary; in fact, he was so unhappy that he refused to ever watch the completed film in its entirety. Once, while staying in a hotel, he accidentally tuned into a television airing of the movie, but reportedly changed the channel immediately when he realized what he was watching."

Dahl HATED WW&TCF. that's why his estate had it remade. Not to mention that it deviates so completely from the source material. Wonka magically likes kids, is a father figure, Charlie behaves badly but still gets rewarded. the entire crux and journey of the characters were changed. it's a bad adaptation of the book. it's a decent film.

i prefer the remake for numerous reasons.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@ bart
oh my gosh the first time I made the connection between Jack and Wonka I laughed at myself four three minutes straight!!!

anyway, I agree on the songs. the originals were really good. for these, you couldn't remember a single word.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
also, the tie between favorite scenes goes to the opening where Wonka compares the rich brat to a wart or the scene where Wonka talks about chocolate stimulating the sensation of love. The look on his face when the mom says "you don't say?" gets me every time!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 59 comments




Email This Post to a Friend
"Movie Trivia: Charlie and the Chocolate Factory"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More