Science Solves the Riddle of Why We Swing Our Arms While We Walk

By Alex in Science & Tech on Jul 29, 2009 at 2:56 am

Takin’ a break from weighty science research like finding a cure for cancer and whatnot, scientists have now solved the riddle of why we swing our arms when walking:

Swinging one’s arms comes at a cost. We need muscles to do it, and we need to provide energy in the form of food for those muscles. So what’s the advantage?

Little or none, some experts have said, contending that arm-swinging, like our appendix, is an evolutionary relic from when we used to go about on all fours.

But a trio of specialists from the United States and the Netherlands have put the question to rigorous tests.

They built a mechanical model to get an idea of the dynamics of arm-swinging and then recruited 10 volunteers, who were asked to walk with a normal swing, an opposite-to-normal swing, with their arms folded or held by their sides. [...]

Arm-swinging turned out to be a plus, rather than a negative, the investigators found.

For one thing, it is surprisingly, er, "’armless" in energy costs, requiring little torque, or rotational twist, from the shoulder muscles. Holding one’s arms as one walks requires 12 percent more metabolic energy, compared with swinging them.

Link


Email This Post
Tweet This Post 
Share This Post on Facebook

Tags: ,


Neat stuff from the NeatoShop:


  1. Skipweasel
    Jul 29th, 2009 at 3:34 am

    I thought everyone knew this? Try walking with your arms to your sides and you’ll soon tire. Anyway, anyone with a mechanical bent can tell that it’s more efficient just by watching it.

  2. Foreigner1
    Jul 29th, 2009 at 4:20 am

    No but Skipweasel in our modern world nothing is possible until some scientist has proven it to exist and happen. Dogs don’t dream until scientifically proven. gravity does not exist until scientifically proven. We only swing our arms for a reason because scientists have found out a reason and not one moment before that. Until that magical moment that scientists have given their stamp if scientific approval, it doesn’t exist, it doesn’t have a reason for being, it is not possible. No matter what we ourselves see or experience.

  3. Larfin Jackarse
    Jul 29th, 2009 at 6:33 am

    Hmmm…amusing.

    I thought modern humans swung their arms to keep the flies off. Or is that just Oz?

  4. marcintosh
    Jul 29th, 2009 at 8:06 am

    It’s probably connected to the blush response. If you walk without swinging your arms you just look stupid. Nobody wants that.

  5. TimO
    Jul 29th, 2009 at 8:54 am

    Why we swing our arms when we walk…. uhhhhhh, because monkeys do???

    How do you get one of these cushy ‘research’ jobs?????

  6. Guest
    Jul 29th, 2009 at 9:02 am

    Hmmm I have to force myself to swing my arms every time I walk.. is that..evolution? It makes me an outsider. I actually have to practice to look normal when I walk.

  7. Gail Pink
    Jul 29th, 2009 at 11:08 am

    This post reminds me of the Seinfeld episode where Elaine mildly criticizes her colleague (played by Molly Shannon) for not swinging her arms when she walks, provoking Shannon to fly into a violent rage. Hilarious.

  8. Ronald
    Jul 29th, 2009 at 1:16 pm

    Science is not a monolithic entity. Out of millions of scientists on earth, some will work on problems like this. It would be unfulfilling and unproductive (if not devastating) for all scientists to spend the rest of their careers working on a single problem, such as finding a cure for cancer. Without the division of labor and diversity, society would grind to a halt.

  9. Gauldar
    Jul 29th, 2009 at 1:16 pm

    So for exercise reasons, is it better to swing your arms or not swing them?

  10. NeonCat
    Jul 29th, 2009 at 1:21 pm

    I saw Oliver Sacks recently say that Parkinson’s patients don’t swing their arms when they walk.

  11. Ronald
    Jul 29th, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    I would also hope that reasonable people would take something as fact if it was based on scientific research and evidence, instead of relying on the visceral or bigoted tendencies, or taking words literally and out of context from some manuscript written hundreds of years ago and making unprovable claims.

  12. konfetkak
    Jul 29th, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    I had a therapist tell me that depressed people don’t swing their arms…something about synapses not firing properly or whatnot (I have no idea, I’m terrible at biology). I actually had to walk around the office for her and now I’m self-conscious about it.

    And I thought of the same think Gail Pink. That’s one of my favorite episodes, where Elaine gets into a fight with Requel Welch.

  13. Kathy
    Jul 29th, 2009 at 9:10 pm

    Related to this: Why do speed skaters hold one arm behind their back as they’re doing laps and then bring that arm forward on the last lap, like it contains stored energy or something?

  14. Kalel
    Jul 29th, 2009 at 9:39 pm

    So many people up in arms over some swinging research, baby!

  15. Tigerlily
    Jul 29th, 2009 at 11:02 pm

    I think that people with narrower hips swing their arms more. It helps with the balance and shorter gait. Anyone noticed this?


Keep track of the comments with Comment RSS

Don't Miss: New Stuff | Bestsellers | The Cute Store
                   Funny T-Shirts

Need a gift? Get unforgettable gifts for:
Geeks | Pranksters | Kids | Hipsters | Shutterbugs

Lijit Search

Old school? Bookmark us! RSS Feed Twitter Facebook Page