Roboticists Argue for Robot System of Ethics

Since scientists are out to kill us again, what with flesh-eating robots, ethicists and roboticists have called for revisions to Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics:

A human-robot co-existence society could emerge by 2030, says Chen in his paper. Already iRobot’s Roomba robotic vacuum cleaner and Scooba floor cleaner are a part of more than 3 million American households. The next generation robots will be more sophisticated and are expected to provide services such as nursing, security, housework and education.

These machines will have the ability to make independent decisions and work reasonably unsupervised. That’s why, says Chen, it may be time to decide who regulates robots.


If it was up to you, what laws would you program into robots?

Link

Newest 5
Newest 5 Comments

Robot laws are scifi nonsense. As effective as UN laws or any other idealistic set of rules created to give us the illusion of creating safety. Nothing has ever been successfully banned or controlled. Regulations and force through superior technology can hinder things, but not prevent that which people want in their lives...like weapons, drugs, or killing machines to use on their enemies. See the cyberdawnfoundation.com
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
If we have learned anything from computer protocols and formats, it's that there will be thousands of variations of the "laws" that can barely interoperate.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Commenting is closed.





Check out Twaggies' very funny clip:

Tech Fails - Twaggies by Twaggies
Email This Post to a Friend
"Roboticists Argue for Robot System of Ethics"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window