Great Barrier Reef: Gone in 20 Years

First it was bluefin tuna, then Playboy bunnies, then the world's wheat crop. Now the Great Barrier Reef is going to be gone in 20 years, according to marine scientist Charlie Veron:

Charlie Veron, former chief scientist of the Australian Institute of Marine Science, told The Times: “There is no way out, no loopholes. The Great Barrier Reef will be over within 20 years or so.”

Once carbon dioxide had hit the levels predicted for between 2030 and 2060, all coral reefs were doomed to extinction, he said. “They would be the world’s first global ecosystem to collapse. I have the backing of every coral reef scientist, every research organisation. I’ve spoken to them all. This is critical. This is reality.”

Frank Pope of The Times Online has the interview: Link

Everything's going extinct like it's going out of style! What's (or who's) next? Miley Cyrus?

From the Neatoshop: Having Great Vocab Didn't Save the Thesaurus From Extinction


So I thought the great barrier reef has been around for millenia? CO2 levels have been much higher in the past and it survived them then, so why should it be dying now?

Perhaps what is affecting the reefs isn't CO2, but something else?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
I thought they determined that a sea animal was eating the reefs or something which is why it is dying so fast? I have never once heard CO2 to be the problem.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Anytime a scientist talks as if s/he's foaming at the mouth or insists s/he has the backing of the entire scientific community there is a loss of credibility, sounds like some rapper dissing a rival from the other Coast.

If the Coral Barrier really is doomed, that's it, nothing to do unfortunately. Trying to scare people into action usually backfires because of the very tone of doom and gloom inevitability so prevalent in certain areas these days.

Finally, two questions:
-carbon cycles: can we even try to control them? Should we blame every single catastrophe on it?
-evolution: to what extent can and should we try to influence it? Should all species, including humans, just grow and grow exponentially?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@MyTake:

The thing about evolution is its inherent trait of entropy and Fail. Sometimes the forces of survival screw up and cause the extinction, like the species of bird that was having problems attracting females, so the males evolved to be more colorful, which attracted predators who destroyed the species.

So, humans can try grow and grow, but it'll probably just bite us in the ass. Besides, are we evolving? Really?
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
@ Mytake

Read Ishmael by Daniel Quinn and you'll see whay evolution cant be blamed for this. We as humans have stepped past evolution and it is just a matter of time before it bites us.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Johnny Cat, I'd say we humans are evolving if knowledge/self-awareness and adaptation are a reliable indication, but that does not apply universally. You could even argue that some or most people are becoming dumber and less adaptable, if stronger from a purely nutritional/immunological POV.

Also, adaptation can be self-destructive as you mention.

As a layman, I never understood how some biologists argue that human evolution is over. If evolution works, how can it possibly stop? Also, the fact that we are aware of these evolutionary mechanisms and often influence it(saving Pandas from extinction, for instance) adds even more unintended consequences to the whole equation.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
do you really think that human intervention is going to cause a biosphere crash in a mere thirty years? the more urgent these global warming climate change hipsters sound, the more skeptical society is of them. we aren't as stupid as you think we are!
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
This is typical panic - coral reefs have been round for thousands and thousands of years as far as I am aware. Co2 and temperatures have fluctuated hugely - just think about Toba event. This just like the Polar Bears dying out, they aint; there's more than ever been.
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Sorry to troll, but are you guys really engineers?? Surely you understand the concept of a decimal point? Yes coral reefs have been around for 1000's years, but CO2 normally fluctuates over a period of millions of years.

It's like when you try to measure a signal on an oscilloscope and instead of the nice sine or square wave you were expecting you get a flat line and you think there must be something wrong - then you you crank the sample rate knob over to the right and try again -lo and behold, your sine wave appears. We are all living in the trough of a sine wave :-)
Abusive comment hidden. (Show it anyway.)
Login to comment.
Click here to access all of this post's 15 comments




Email This Post to a Friend
"Great Barrier Reef: Gone in 20 Years"

Separate multiple emails with a comma. Limit 5.

 

Success! Your email has been sent!

close window
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
 
Learn More