Comments on: Great Photos By Mark Velasquez

By: andriant

andriant — Sun, 19 Dec 2010 02:19:40 +0000

truly nice images. thanks for sharing this

By: Mark Velasquez

Mark Velasquez — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 01:47:33 +0000

I love when people think that there was more photoshopping done to any of my images than there really was. Aside from a little desaturation on the trees and part of the wolf’s head and ears, this thing is straight out of the camera.

Thanks for all the positive and negative comments!

By: Vlemon

Vlemon — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:44:36 +0000

Sorry, but he takes crappy photos.

By: CatrinaBoscutti

CatrinaBoscutti — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 18:42:10 +0000

This was shot on location. ^_^
I got poison oak to prove it! Hehe

By: A Velasquez Fan

A Velasquez Fan — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:25:33 +0000

This image was shot on location not in a studio though if I remember correctly the wolf was pretty heavily retouched. I’m curious about the responses that this idea has been “done to death.” Will someone post links to other images like this?

By: toots_mcgee

toots_mcgee — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:19:15 +0000

Actually, the first thing I thought was: What a crappy photoshop job. The lighting is all wrong on Red and the wolf, you can tell this was shot in a studio and pasted into a forest scene. And, uh, yeah… talk about beating a cliche to death. Yawn. Won’t even bother looking at the site.

By: MightyCow

MightyCow — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:48:47 +0000

The main reason guys go into photography is to convince women to pose nude for them.

By: ted

ted — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 10:56:39 +0000

Hasn’t this idea been done to death, yet?

By: Nimitz

Nimitz — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:36:46 +0000

I can’t blame the Big Bad Wolf for wanting to eat Lil’ Red Riding Hood.

By: Jim R Feliciano

Jim R Feliciano — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 04:15:18 +0000

An interesting strange idea of beauty