http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/01/skyscrapers-of-the-not-so-distant-future/ The Neat Side of the Web Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:47:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/01/skyscrapers-of-the-not-so-distant-future/comment-page-1/#comment-1779156 ????????? Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:34:31 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/01/skyscrapers-of-the-not-so-distant-future/#comment-1779156 Good. Good.

]]> http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/01/skyscrapers-of-the-not-so-distant-future/comment-page-1/#comment-1760332 Talula Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:23:19 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/01/skyscrapers-of-the-not-so-distant-future/#comment-1760332 Man, America needs to step it up a little. All the other countries' towers are prettier than ours. Man, America needs to step it up a little. All the other countries’ towers are prettier than ours.

]]> http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/01/skyscrapers-of-the-not-so-distant-future/comment-page-1/#comment-1759218 DaveL Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:38:40 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/01/skyscrapers-of-the-not-so-distant-future/#comment-1759218 These are merely monuments to the stupidity of man. These are merely monuments to the stupidity of man.

]]> http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/01/skyscrapers-of-the-not-so-distant-future/comment-page-1/#comment-1758957 Vagabond Tue, 02 Jun 2009 02:13:12 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/01/skyscrapers-of-the-not-so-distant-future/#comment-1758957 "apparently" “apparently”

]]> http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/01/skyscrapers-of-the-not-so-distant-future/comment-page-1/#comment-1758696 vonskippy Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:59:31 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/01/skyscrapers-of-the-not-so-distant-future/#comment-1758696 Unlike others, I always read the the post then comment, hence the "ugly towers" comment. Plus most of those are "scheduled" to be completed - and we all know building schedules are never wrong correct? (see the new "freedom tower" boondoggle for proof) Unlike others, I always read the the post then comment, hence the “ugly towers” comment. Plus most of those are “scheduled” to be completed – and we all know building schedules are never wrong correct? (see the new “freedom tower” boondoggle for proof)

]]> http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/01/skyscrapers-of-the-not-so-distant-future/comment-page-1/#comment-1758668 notoriousnicholas Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:34:47 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/01/skyscrapers-of-the-not-so-distant-future/#comment-1758668 Ok, well most will be finished in the next year or two. Maybe you should read a post, before commenting on it. Ok, well most will be finished in the next year or two. Maybe you should read a post, before commenting on it.

]]> http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/01/skyscrapers-of-the-not-so-distant-future/comment-page-1/#comment-1758662 vonskippy Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:30:19 +0000 http://www.neatorama.com/2009/06/01/skyscrapers-of-the-not-so-distant-future/#comment-1758662 You know what else was supposed to be available in the "not so distant future"? Flying cars and jet packs. Let me know when some of those ugly towers are advertising for occupancy, then I'll oooh and aaah. You know what else was supposed to be available in the “not so distant future”? Flying cars and jet packs. Let me know when some of those ugly towers are advertising for occupancy, then I’ll oooh and aaah.

]]>